Situation Awareness: A Pivotal Process for Sensemaking and Decision Making in the Learning and Practice of Physical Activities

P. Godbout
{"title":"Situation Awareness: A Pivotal Process for Sensemaking and Decision Making in the Learning and Practice of Physical Activities","authors":"P. Godbout","doi":"10.30958/ajspo.10-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In physical education (PE), reflection on action is usually referred to in relation with pedagogical approaches such as experiential learning, constructivism and social constructivism. In organization systems, sensemaking has been discussed in relation with situation awareness (SA), a construct closely related not only to decision making but to understanding as well. In recent years, researchers interested in decision making in high-level sport performance have taken an interest in SA. The purpose of this explanatory article is to examine the applicability of the SA construct, including its related DM and sensemaking processes, to the teaching/learning and performing of diverse categories of physical activities such as sports, dance, fitness activities, outdoor activities and leisure activities in general. In a first section, the author distinguishes two types of SA, current SA and reflected SA, in relation with reflection in action and reflection on action. With regard to the involvement of one or several individuals, three SA facets are suggested: primary SA, distributed SA, and socially shared SA. Following a short discussion on the relationship between SA and the data/frame theory, the author examines the process of framing physical activities in view of situation awareness. Finally, the metacognitive side of framing and situation awareness is briefly discussed in terms of individuals who come to select particular observational cues that work better for them. Keywords: situation awareness, data/frame theory, sensemaking, decision making, frame building","PeriodicalId":8622,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.10-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In physical education (PE), reflection on action is usually referred to in relation with pedagogical approaches such as experiential learning, constructivism and social constructivism. In organization systems, sensemaking has been discussed in relation with situation awareness (SA), a construct closely related not only to decision making but to understanding as well. In recent years, researchers interested in decision making in high-level sport performance have taken an interest in SA. The purpose of this explanatory article is to examine the applicability of the SA construct, including its related DM and sensemaking processes, to the teaching/learning and performing of diverse categories of physical activities such as sports, dance, fitness activities, outdoor activities and leisure activities in general. In a first section, the author distinguishes two types of SA, current SA and reflected SA, in relation with reflection in action and reflection on action. With regard to the involvement of one or several individuals, three SA facets are suggested: primary SA, distributed SA, and socially shared SA. Following a short discussion on the relationship between SA and the data/frame theory, the author examines the process of framing physical activities in view of situation awareness. Finally, the metacognitive side of framing and situation awareness is briefly discussed in terms of individuals who come to select particular observational cues that work better for them. Keywords: situation awareness, data/frame theory, sensemaking, decision making, frame building
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境感知:体育活动学习与实践中意义与决策的关键过程
在体育教学中,对行动的反思通常与体验学习、建构主义和社会建构主义等教学方法有关。在组织系统中,已经讨论了与情境感知(SA)的关系,情境感知不仅与决策密切相关,而且与理解密切相关。近年来,对高水平运动表现中的决策感兴趣的研究人员对SA产生了兴趣。这篇解释性文章的目的是检验SA结构的适用性,包括其相关的DM和语义制造过程,在不同类型的体育活动(如运动、舞蹈、健身活动、户外活动和一般的休闲活动)的教/学和表演中。在第一部分中,作者区分了两种类型的言语表达,即当前的言语表达和反映的言语表达,以及行为中的反思和对行为的反思。关于一个或几个个体的参与,可以提出三个方面的SA:原发性SA、分布式SA和社会共享SA。在简要讨论了情景认知与数据/框架理论之间的关系之后,作者从情境意识的角度考察了构建体育活动框架的过程。最后,简要讨论了框架和情境意识的元认知方面,即那些选择对他们更有效的特定观察线索的个体。关键词:态势感知,数据/框架理论,意义生成,决策,框架构建
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why No Swimming in the Ancient Olympics? Analyzing the Efficiency of Passing Networks in Soccer Foreign Players in the Greek Football League: Evidence from the 2023-24 Regular Season Gadamer’s Hermeneutic Universality of Play: The Greatest Form of Human Play is Art and its Signification to Movement Education A Mathematical Analysis of Team Impact and Individual Player Contribution in Football
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1