Communication policies for innovation financed with public funds in Spain: the experts’ view

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Profesional De La Informacion Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.08
María J. Vilaplana-Aparicio, M. Martín-Llaguno, María-Teresa Iglesias-García
{"title":"Communication policies for innovation financed with public funds in Spain: the experts’ view","authors":"María J. Vilaplana-Aparicio, M. Martín-Llaguno, María-Teresa Iglesias-García","doi":"10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies that receive public funds for research and development and technological innovation (RD innovation, transparency, and scientific dissemination specialists; and company directors. The results confirm the value of communicating innovation, in accordance with the current trends of innovation dissemination and the principles of transparency. Experts consider that the required communication requirements are insufficient and that their means and formats must be adapted to enhance the dissemination of innovation and improve transparency by promoting accessible content in a unified repository. They propose the measurement and assessment of the social impact of subsidized projects, as well as the possibility of subsidizing communication actions, as in European projects. Moreover, there is an urgent need to standardize the communication obligations of all proposals.","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Companies that receive public funds for research and development and technological innovation (RD innovation, transparency, and scientific dissemination specialists; and company directors. The results confirm the value of communicating innovation, in accordance with the current trends of innovation dissemination and the principles of transparency. Experts consider that the required communication requirements are insufficient and that their means and formats must be adapted to enhance the dissemination of innovation and improve transparency by promoting accessible content in a unified repository. They propose the measurement and assessment of the social impact of subsidized projects, as well as the possibility of subsidizing communication actions, as in European projects. Moreover, there is an urgent need to standardize the communication obligations of all proposals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙公共基金资助的创新传播政策:专家的观点
接受公共资金用于研发和技术创新(研发创新、透明度和科学传播专家)的公司;还有公司董事。根据当前创新传播的趋势和透明度原则,研究结果证实了传播创新的价值。专家们认为,所需的通信要求是不够的,必须调整其手段和格式,以便通过促进统一存储库中的无障碍内容来加强创新的传播和提高透明度。他们建议衡量和评估资助项目的社会影响,以及像欧洲项目那样资助传播行动的可能性。此外,迫切需要规范所有提案的沟通义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of online education among 16-18-year-olds: Differences and similarities in their interests and preferred formats according to where they live Informal learning of Spanish in a Chinese music fan community Social responsibility of Spanish universities for sustainable relationships Political polarization and politainment: Methodology for analyzing crypto hate speech on TikTok Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1