Structure and condition of older stands in parks and open space areas of San Francisco, California

Joe R. McBride, Denice Froehlich
{"title":"Structure and condition of older stands in parks and open space areas of San Francisco, California","authors":"Joe R. McBride,&nbsp;Denice Froehlich","doi":"10.1016/0304-4009(84)90013-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Planted forest stands and tree groves in parks and open space areas in San Francisco are aging. These stands, dominated by Monterey pine (<em>Pinus radiata</em>), Monterey cypress (<em>Cupressus macrocarpa</em>) and eucalyptus (<em>Eucalyptus globulus</em>), were planted over a 30-year period beginning in the 1880's. Stand structure varies between park areas planted for amenity values and open space areas planted for wind protection. Park stands have larger diameter trees (92.7 vs. 48.6 cm), fewer trees per ha (147 vs. 265), and greater basal area (130.0 vs. 51.5 m<sup>2</sup>/ha) than open space stands. About half of the Monterey pine and eucalyptus trees and one-third of the Monterey cypress trees occurring in older stands were rated as being in fair or poor condition. Common defects of these trees included butt, bole and root rots, excessive lean, large dead branches, and small percent live crown. Regeneration was absent or judged inadequate in stands of Monterey pine and Monterey cypress in both the park and open space areas. Eucalyptus stands are regenerating through root sprouts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101265,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecology","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 165-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-4009(84)90013-5","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304400984900135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Planted forest stands and tree groves in parks and open space areas in San Francisco are aging. These stands, dominated by Monterey pine (Pinus radiata), Monterey cypress (Cupressus macrocarpa) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), were planted over a 30-year period beginning in the 1880's. Stand structure varies between park areas planted for amenity values and open space areas planted for wind protection. Park stands have larger diameter trees (92.7 vs. 48.6 cm), fewer trees per ha (147 vs. 265), and greater basal area (130.0 vs. 51.5 m2/ha) than open space stands. About half of the Monterey pine and eucalyptus trees and one-third of the Monterey cypress trees occurring in older stands were rated as being in fair or poor condition. Common defects of these trees included butt, bole and root rots, excessive lean, large dead branches, and small percent live crown. Regeneration was absent or judged inadequate in stands of Monterey pine and Monterey cypress in both the park and open space areas. Eucalyptus stands are regenerating through root sprouts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加州旧金山公园和开放空间地区的旧看台结构和状况
旧金山公园和空地上的人工林和小树林正在老化。这些林分以蒙特雷松(Pinus radiata)、蒙特雷柏树(Cupressus macrocarpa)和桉树(eucalyptus globulus)为主,从19世纪80年代开始种植了30多年。林分结构在公园区域种植的舒适价值和开放空间区域种植的防风之间有所不同。公园林分的树木直径较大(92.7比48.6 cm),每公顷树木较少(147比265),基底面积较大(130.0比51.5 m2/ha)。大约一半的蒙特雷松树和桉树以及三分之一的蒙特雷柏树生长在较老的林分中,被评为处于一般或较差的状态。这些树的常见缺陷包括屁股,洞和根腐,过度消瘦,大死枝,和小百分比的活树冠。在公园和开放空间区域,蒙特雷松和蒙特雷柏树的林分缺乏或被认为不够再生。桉树林通过根芽再生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban Ecology Ecological Restoration Peruvian Gardens Index Urban ecology and human health: implications of urban heat island, air pollution and climate change nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1