Prior information in econometric real estate appraisal: a mixed estimation procedure

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of European Real Estate Research Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.1108/jerer-11-2020-0057
M. Doszyń
{"title":"Prior information in econometric real estate appraisal: a mixed estimation procedure","authors":"M. Doszyń","doi":"10.1108/jerer-11-2020-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present how prior knowledge about the impact of real estate features on value might be utilised in the econometric models of real estate appraisal. In these models, price is a dependent variable and real estate features are explanatory variables. Moreover, these kinds of models might support individual and mass appraisals.Design/methodology/approachA mixed estimation procedure was discussed in the research. It enables using sample and prior information in an estimation process. Prior information was provided by real estate experts in the form of parameter intervals. Also, sample information about the prices and features of undeveloped land for low-residential purposes was used. Then, mixed estimation results were compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) outcomes. Finally, the estimated econometric models were assessed with regard to both formal criteria and valuation accuracy.FindingsThe OLS results were unacceptable, mostly because of the low quality of the database, which is often the case on local, undeveloped real estate markets. The mixed results are much more consistent with formal expectations and the real estate valuations are also better for a mixed model. In a mixed model, the impact of each real estate feature could be estimated, even if there is no variability in the sample information. Valuations are also more precise in terms of their consistency with market prices. The mean error (ME) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are lower for a mixed model.Originality/valueThe crucial problem in econometric property valuation is that it involves the unreliability of databases, especially on undeveloped, local markets. The applied mixed estimation procedure might support sample information with prior knowledge, in the form of stochastic restrictions imposed on parameters. Thus, that kind of knowledge might be obtained from real estate experts, practitioners, etc.","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-11-2020-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present how prior knowledge about the impact of real estate features on value might be utilised in the econometric models of real estate appraisal. In these models, price is a dependent variable and real estate features are explanatory variables. Moreover, these kinds of models might support individual and mass appraisals.Design/methodology/approachA mixed estimation procedure was discussed in the research. It enables using sample and prior information in an estimation process. Prior information was provided by real estate experts in the form of parameter intervals. Also, sample information about the prices and features of undeveloped land for low-residential purposes was used. Then, mixed estimation results were compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) outcomes. Finally, the estimated econometric models were assessed with regard to both formal criteria and valuation accuracy.FindingsThe OLS results were unacceptable, mostly because of the low quality of the database, which is often the case on local, undeveloped real estate markets. The mixed results are much more consistent with formal expectations and the real estate valuations are also better for a mixed model. In a mixed model, the impact of each real estate feature could be estimated, even if there is no variability in the sample information. Valuations are also more precise in terms of their consistency with market prices. The mean error (ME) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are lower for a mixed model.Originality/valueThe crucial problem in econometric property valuation is that it involves the unreliability of databases, especially on undeveloped, local markets. The applied mixed estimation procedure might support sample information with prior knowledge, in the form of stochastic restrictions imposed on parameters. Thus, that kind of knowledge might be obtained from real estate experts, practitioners, etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计量经济房地产估价中的先验信息:一个混合估计过程
本文的目的是展示如何在房地产评估的计量经济模型中利用有关房地产特征对价值影响的先验知识。在这些模型中,价格是因变量,房地产特征是解释变量。此外,这些类型的模型可能支持个人和集体评估。设计/方法/方法在研究中讨论了混合估计过程。它允许在估计过程中使用样本和先验信息。先验信息由房地产专家以参数区间的形式提供。此外,还使用了关于低住宅用途未开发土地的价格和特征的样本信息。然后,将混合估计结果与普通最小二乘(OLS)结果进行比较。最后,评估了估计的计量经济模型的形式标准和估值准确性。调查结果OLS的结果是不可接受的,主要是因为数据库的质量较低,这是当地未开发的房地产市场经常出现的情况。混合模型的结果与正式预期更加一致,并且混合模型的房地产估值也更好。在混合模型中,即使样本信息中没有可变性,也可以估计每个房地产特征的影响。就与市场价格的一致性而言,估值也更加精确。混合模型的平均误差(ME)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)较低。独创性/价值计量财产估价的关键问题在于,它涉及到数据库的不可靠性,特别是在不发达的本地市场上。应用的混合估计过程可能支持具有先验知识的样本信息,其形式是对参数施加随机限制。因此,这类知识可以从房地产专家、从业人员等那里获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of renovation subsidies on housing markets – evidence from the Swedish property market Valuation of cyclical assets and exit value ESG dynamics in real estate: temporal patterns and financial implications for REITs returns An examination of the needs and preferences for student housing in Germany in relation to different financial backgrounds using the example of the city of Aachen A framework for the management of retail assets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1