Between the law and the actual situation: Failure as property formation in French colonial Indochina

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning D-Society & Space Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1177/02637758221081142
Érin Collins, S. Nam
{"title":"Between the law and the actual situation: Failure as property formation in French colonial Indochina","authors":"Érin Collins, S. Nam","doi":"10.1177/02637758221081142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article complements and complicates Bhandar’s discussion of ‘racial regimes of ownership’ (2018) by examining the relational co-constitution of notions of racial and property formations in the ‘non-settler’ colonial context of Cambodia. Working through the record of intra-colonial correspondence relating to the control of non-white but also non-Khmer property interests in Cambodia, this article documents racialization’s powerful disruptive impact on liberal property formation. Colonial failure as property formation indexes, first, how the racialized categories of ethnic difference that underpinned the rationalities of French colonial rule simultaneously undermined French colonial programs to alienate land. Second, it positions the failure to reconcile a confusing array of property laws and logics as integral to maintaining paternalistic colonial (and post-colonial) authority to sort racialized populations via the privilege of property. Through the lens of French attempts to control property claims, we show how the French colonial property regime, supposedly based on universal liberal norms, was in fact also deeply racialized, requiring it to be managed in a highly localized manner, in accordance with each territory’s existing set of ethnic property relations—or the practical racial hierarchy of colonialism would unravel.","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"6 1","pages":"227 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221081142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article complements and complicates Bhandar’s discussion of ‘racial regimes of ownership’ (2018) by examining the relational co-constitution of notions of racial and property formations in the ‘non-settler’ colonial context of Cambodia. Working through the record of intra-colonial correspondence relating to the control of non-white but also non-Khmer property interests in Cambodia, this article documents racialization’s powerful disruptive impact on liberal property formation. Colonial failure as property formation indexes, first, how the racialized categories of ethnic difference that underpinned the rationalities of French colonial rule simultaneously undermined French colonial programs to alienate land. Second, it positions the failure to reconcile a confusing array of property laws and logics as integral to maintaining paternalistic colonial (and post-colonial) authority to sort racialized populations via the privilege of property. Through the lens of French attempts to control property claims, we show how the French colonial property regime, supposedly based on universal liberal norms, was in fact also deeply racialized, requiring it to be managed in a highly localized manner, in accordance with each territory’s existing set of ethnic property relations—or the practical racial hierarchy of colonialism would unravel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文通过考察柬埔寨“非定居者”殖民背景下种族和财产形成概念的关系共构成,补充并复杂化了班达尔关于“种族所有权制度”(2018)的讨论。通过对柬埔寨非白人和非高棉人财产利益控制的殖民内部通信记录的研究,本文记录了种族化对自由财产形成的强大破坏性影响。作为财产形成指标的殖民失败,首先,支撑法国殖民统治合理性的种族化的种族差异类别如何同时破坏了法国殖民计划的土地异化。其次,它将无法调和一系列令人困惑的财产法和逻辑的失败定位为维持家长式的殖民(和后殖民)权威,通过财产特权对种族化的人口进行分类的必要条件。通过法国试图控制财产索赔的视角,我们展示了法国殖民财产制度,据说是基于普遍的自由规范,实际上也是深刻的种族化,要求它以高度本地化的方式进行管理,根据每个领土现有的种族财产关系,否则殖民主义的实际种族等级将会瓦解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
期刊最新文献
Living and dying in the shadow of coal: Relocating social death and its contestations in Lephalale Re-forming resource entrepôts: Urban investment, extraction, and Beira’s Grande and Golden Peacock Hotels If ‘it all breaks down’: The Norwegian refugee crisis as a geography of chaos Livestreamed land: Scams and certainty in Myanmar’s digital land market Earthmoving for the extraterrestrial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1