Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fracture by Digital Radiography With and Without Unsharp Masking Filter: An In-vitro Study

M. Yazdizadeh, Ali Habibi Kia, Pouya Kavianpour, Parnian Alavinejad
{"title":"Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fracture by Digital Radiography With and Without Unsharp Masking Filter: An In-vitro Study","authors":"M. Yazdizadeh, Ali Habibi Kia, Pouya Kavianpour, Parnian Alavinejad","doi":"10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives The digital radiography offers a variety of image processing techniques. Due to the importance of the accuracy of this method and its widespread applications, in this study we aim to investigate the diagnose of vertical root fracture (VRF) by conventional digital radiography with and without unsharp masking (UM) filter. Subjects and Methods Radiographs were taken from 24 extracted anterior teeth before and after VRF induction. The root canal was prepared with passive step-back technique, and then the teeth were divided into two halves buccolingually with a very thin disk. The two halves were re-attached to each other and mounted in a mixture of gypsum and sawdust. After processing by the UM filter, the radiographs were evaluated by two observers to detect the presence or absence of VRF. Results For the first observer, the sensitivity of both methods was the same, while the specificity of the UM filtering mode was higher. For the second observer, the sensitivity of the unfiltered mode was higher, while the specificity of the two methods was the same. Conclusion There is no significant difference between digital radiography with and without the UM filter in diagnosing VRF. Due to the high sensivity and specifity of the UM filtering method, the specialist can use this filter based on personal preferences.","PeriodicalId":17808,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jsmj.21.4.2692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives The digital radiography offers a variety of image processing techniques. Due to the importance of the accuracy of this method and its widespread applications, in this study we aim to investigate the diagnose of vertical root fracture (VRF) by conventional digital radiography with and without unsharp masking (UM) filter. Subjects and Methods Radiographs were taken from 24 extracted anterior teeth before and after VRF induction. The root canal was prepared with passive step-back technique, and then the teeth were divided into two halves buccolingually with a very thin disk. The two halves were re-attached to each other and mounted in a mixture of gypsum and sawdust. After processing by the UM filter, the radiographs were evaluated by two observers to detect the presence or absence of VRF. Results For the first observer, the sensitivity of both methods was the same, while the specificity of the UM filtering mode was higher. For the second observer, the sensitivity of the unfiltered mode was higher, while the specificity of the two methods was the same. Conclusion There is no significant difference between digital radiography with and without the UM filter in diagnosing VRF. Due to the high sensivity and specifity of the UM filtering method, the specialist can use this filter based on personal preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带和不带非锐利掩蔽滤波器的数字x线摄影诊断垂直根骨折:一项体外研究
背景与目的数字放射照相提供了多种图像处理技术。由于该方法的准确性及其广泛应用的重要性,在本研究中,我们的目的是研究常规数字x线摄影的诊断垂直根骨折(VRF),有和没有非尖锐掩蔽(UM)滤波器。对象与方法对24颗拔除的前牙进行VRF诱导前后的x线片观察。采用被动退步技术预备根管,然后用极薄的牙盘将牙根管分成两半。这两半被重新连接在一起,并安装在石膏和锯末的混合物中。经过UM滤波器处理后,由两名观察员评估x线照片以检测是否存在VRF。结果对于第一观察者,两种方法的灵敏度相同,而UM过滤方式的特异性更高。对于第二个观察者,未滤波模式的灵敏度更高,而两种方法的特异性相同。结论带UM滤光片和不带UM滤光片的数字x线摄影对VRF的诊断无显著性差异。由于UM过滤方法的高灵敏度和特异性,专家可以根据个人喜好使用该过滤器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of moderate intensity continuous exercises and nano-curcumin supplementation on sensory-motor disorders in Rats with brain tumors Evaluation of the internal structure of the coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS): A Factor analytic study Prostate Cancer Detection through MR Images based on Black Hole Optimization Algorithm In Silico Structural-based Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking Analysis of Plant-derived Small Molecules for Treatment of COVID-19 Measuring the Empathy of Medical Students in Ahvaz Jundishapuz University of Medical Sciences and Its Relationship With Their Age, Sex, and Religiosity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1