Effectiveness of replacing cement partially with waste brick powder in mortar

{"title":"Effectiveness of replacing cement partially with waste brick powder in mortar","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jksues.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This investigation was aimed at finding the optimum replacement level of waste brick powder (WBP) as a partial replacement of cement. For this purpose, three groups of tests are made: fresh, mechanical, and permeation properties. Eight mixes with different percentages of replacing ratios are as follows: 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 50%. In addition to the reference mix without powder replacements, the experimental programs include three groups of tests: fresh properties (flow test and fresh density), mechanical properties (dry density, compressive strength, and flexural strength), and transport properties (water absorption ratio, rate of water absorption, i.e., sorptivity, and permeable void ratio). Also, an ultrasonic velocity impulse test was made. The flowability and density of fresh mixes are decreased linearly as the amount of WBP increases for the constant water/binder ratio. However, the density of the in-hardened state was found to be slightly higher than the reference mix for mixes with a brick powder content of up to 20%. Results indicate that strengths for mixes containing WBP are higher than those for the control mix. The highest strength was examined in the mix with 15% WBP for both compressive and tensile strengths of specimens. Generally, the brick powder reduced the ability of mortar to transfer liquid, as was clear from the results of the permeability test results. Empirical relations were proposed according to experimental results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363922000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigation was aimed at finding the optimum replacement level of waste brick powder (WBP) as a partial replacement of cement. For this purpose, three groups of tests are made: fresh, mechanical, and permeation properties. Eight mixes with different percentages of replacing ratios are as follows: 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 50%. In addition to the reference mix without powder replacements, the experimental programs include three groups of tests: fresh properties (flow test and fresh density), mechanical properties (dry density, compressive strength, and flexural strength), and transport properties (water absorption ratio, rate of water absorption, i.e., sorptivity, and permeable void ratio). Also, an ultrasonic velocity impulse test was made. The flowability and density of fresh mixes are decreased linearly as the amount of WBP increases for the constant water/binder ratio. However, the density of the in-hardened state was found to be slightly higher than the reference mix for mixes with a brick powder content of up to 20%. Results indicate that strengths for mixes containing WBP are higher than those for the control mix. The highest strength was examined in the mix with 15% WBP for both compressive and tensile strengths of specimens. Generally, the brick powder reduced the ability of mortar to transfer liquid, as was clear from the results of the permeability test results. Empirical relations were proposed according to experimental results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在砂浆中用废砖粉部分替代水泥的效果
这项研究旨在找出废砖粉(WBP)作为水泥部分替代品的最佳替代水平。为此,进行了三组测试:新拌性能、机械性能和渗透性能。八种不同替代比例的混合料如下:10、15、20、25、30、35、40 和 50%。除了不含粉末替代物的参考混合料外,实验项目还包括三组测试:新鲜特性(流动试验和新鲜密度)、机械特性(干密度、抗压强度和抗折强度)和运输特性(吸水率、吸水率,即吸水率和渗透空隙率)。此外,还进行了超声波速度脉冲测试。在水/粘合剂比率不变的情况下,随着 WBP 用量的增加,新鲜混合料的流动性和密度呈线性下降。不过,对于砖粉含量高达 20% 的混合料来说,硬化状态的密度略高于参考混合料。结果表明,含有 WBP 的混合料强度高于对照混合料。在试样的抗压和抗拉强度方面,含有 15% WBP 的混合料强度最高。一般来说,砖粉降低了砂浆转移液体的能力,这一点从渗透性测试结果中可以明显看出。根据实验结果提出了经验关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences (JKSUES) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. It is hosted and published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. JKSUES is devoted to a wide range of sub-fields in the Engineering Sciences and JKSUES welcome articles of interdisciplinary nature.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring the critical frequent factors of rework and assigning strategies to mitigate their occurrence in the Egyptian construction projects Understanding the impacts of binary additives on the mechanical and morphological response of ameliorated soil for road infrastructures Application of soil-based low-impact development system for Flash Flood management of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Static and dynamic characterization of fiber reinforced sand: A numerical investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1