The Symbiotic Mechanism of the Influence of Productive and Transactional Agricultural Social Services on the Use of Soil Testing and Formula Fertilization Technology by Tea Farmers

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agriculture-Basel Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.3390/agriculture13091696
Zhiyun Zhou, Haoling Liao, Hua Li
{"title":"The Symbiotic Mechanism of the Influence of Productive and Transactional Agricultural Social Services on the Use of Soil Testing and Formula Fertilization Technology by Tea Farmers","authors":"Zhiyun Zhou, Haoling Liao, Hua Li","doi":"10.3390/agriculture13091696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this investigation, we analyze data from 929 tea farmers across Shanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui provinces to elucidate the impact of productive and transactional agricultural social services on farmers’ adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology. Our perspective centers on the farmers’ standpoint and the underpinning mechanisms of these influences. Our findings delineate several key points: Both transactional and productive socialized services exert a positive influence on farmers’ decisions to adopt green production technologies, with the impact of productive socialized services being more pronounced than their transactional counterparts. The enthusiasm and the scale of adoption for green production technologies among farmers are positively impacted by both types of socialized services, a conclusion robust even when potential endogeneity and other statistical biases are corrected using IV Probit. The influence mechanism of transactional and productive social services operates symbiotically, primarily fostering trust, enhancing farmers’ tea price expectations and industry cognition, driving positive social evaluations, and motivating speculative behavior among farmers. Transactional and productive socialization services show varying propensities in promoting the adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology, depending on the farmers’ type, endowments, and income levels. Involvement in these agricultural socialization services enables farmers to bolster their income, improve technical proficiency and information-gathering capabilities, jointly participate in market competition, reduce market risks, and enhance their recognition and choice of green production technologies. This appears to be a crucial catalyst for the successful promotion of greener development and transformation within agriculture and rural areas.","PeriodicalId":48587,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture-Basel","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this investigation, we analyze data from 929 tea farmers across Shanxi, Sichuan, and Anhui provinces to elucidate the impact of productive and transactional agricultural social services on farmers’ adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology. Our perspective centers on the farmers’ standpoint and the underpinning mechanisms of these influences. Our findings delineate several key points: Both transactional and productive socialized services exert a positive influence on farmers’ decisions to adopt green production technologies, with the impact of productive socialized services being more pronounced than their transactional counterparts. The enthusiasm and the scale of adoption for green production technologies among farmers are positively impacted by both types of socialized services, a conclusion robust even when potential endogeneity and other statistical biases are corrected using IV Probit. The influence mechanism of transactional and productive social services operates symbiotically, primarily fostering trust, enhancing farmers’ tea price expectations and industry cognition, driving positive social evaluations, and motivating speculative behavior among farmers. Transactional and productive socialization services show varying propensities in promoting the adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology, depending on the farmers’ type, endowments, and income levels. Involvement in these agricultural socialization services enables farmers to bolster their income, improve technical proficiency and information-gathering capabilities, jointly participate in market competition, reduce market risks, and enhance their recognition and choice of green production technologies. This appears to be a crucial catalyst for the successful promotion of greener development and transformation within agriculture and rural areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产性和交易性农业社会服务对茶农使用土壤测试和配方施肥技术影响的共生机制
本研究分析了山西、四川和安徽三省929名茶农的数据,以阐明生产性和交易性农业社会服务对农民采用土壤测试和配方施肥技术的影响。我们的观点集中在农民的立场和这些影响的基础机制。我们的研究结果描述了几个关键点:交易和生产性社会化服务都对农民采用绿色生产技术的决策产生积极影响,其中生产性社会化服务的影响比交易性社会化服务的影响更为明显。农民对绿色生产技术的热情和采用规模受到这两种社会化服务的积极影响,即使使用IV Probit修正了潜在的内生性和其他统计偏差,这一结论也很有力。交易性社会服务与生产性社会服务的影响机制是共生运行的,主要是建立信任,增强农民对茶叶价格的预期和行业认知,推动积极的社会评价,激发农民的投机行为。交易性和生产性社会化服务在促进采用土壤测试和配方施肥技术方面表现出不同的倾向,这取决于农民的类型、禀赋和收入水平。农民参与这些农业社会化服务,可以增加收入,提高技术水平和信息收集能力,共同参与市场竞争,降低市场风险,增强对绿色生产技术的认识和选择。这似乎是成功促进农业和农村地区绿色发展和转型的关键催化剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture-Basel
Agriculture-Basel Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1793
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture (ISSN 2077-0472) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly and scientific open access journal on the science of cultivating the soil, growing, harvesting crops, and raising livestock. We will aim to look at production, processing, marketing and use of foods, fibers, plants and animals. The journal Agriculturewill publish reviews, regular research papers, communications and short notes, and there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
The Association of Socio-Economic Factors and Indigenous Crops on the Food Security Status of Farming Households in KwaZulu-Natal Province. Effects of Dietary Galla Chinensis Tannin Supplementation on Antioxidant Capacity and Intestinal Microbiota Composition in Broilers Genetic Variability of Oil Palm in Mexico: An Assessment Based on Microsatellite Markers Zinc Absorption through Leaves and Subsequent Translocation to the Grains of Bread Wheat after Foliar Spray Data-Driven Soil Analysis and Evaluation for Smart Farming Using Machine Learning Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1