Assertive Action in Indonesian Debate Competition 2019

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.23887/jlls.v5i3.53962
Tutike Lahunduitan, Endry Boeriswati, Asti Purbarini
{"title":"Assertive Action in Indonesian Debate Competition 2019","authors":"Tutike Lahunduitan, Endry Boeriswati, Asti Purbarini","doi":"10.23887/jlls.v5i3.53962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students must be directed to express themselves positively, especially in expressing opinions and ideas, because they have a wide range of positive potential and bright pictures that can be used as alternative suggestions, especially regarding the problems currently experienced by Indonesia. This study analyzes assertive speech acts, forms, and functions in the 2019 Indonesian Debate Competition. This research is descriptive qualitative research using content analysis methods. The research subject under study was a debate competition video with the data object in the form of utterances showing the structure of assertive speech acts. This study's data collection techniques and procedures are documentation, recordings, and transcripts. The technique used to analyze the data is descriptive qualitative analysis. The findings show that news sentences as assertive speech acts have the highest intensity at 77.85%, imperative sentences at 12.14%, and interrogative sentences at 10%. Then states as a function of influential speech acts, which has the highest power of 26.42%, shows 22.14%, informs 17.14%, suggests 10.71%, and confirms 10.71%. This research is recommended to add to the general public's insight as a consideration of teaching materials for assertive speech acts at the tertiary and secondary levels.","PeriodicalId":45210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i3.53962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students must be directed to express themselves positively, especially in expressing opinions and ideas, because they have a wide range of positive potential and bright pictures that can be used as alternative suggestions, especially regarding the problems currently experienced by Indonesia. This study analyzes assertive speech acts, forms, and functions in the 2019 Indonesian Debate Competition. This research is descriptive qualitative research using content analysis methods. The research subject under study was a debate competition video with the data object in the form of utterances showing the structure of assertive speech acts. This study's data collection techniques and procedures are documentation, recordings, and transcripts. The technique used to analyze the data is descriptive qualitative analysis. The findings show that news sentences as assertive speech acts have the highest intensity at 77.85%, imperative sentences at 12.14%, and interrogative sentences at 10%. Then states as a function of influential speech acts, which has the highest power of 26.42%, shows 22.14%, informs 17.14%, suggests 10.71%, and confirms 10.71%. This research is recommended to add to the general public's insight as a consideration of teaching materials for assertive speech acts at the tertiary and secondary levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年印度尼西亚辩论赛的自信行动
必须引导学生积极地表达自己,特别是在表达意见和想法方面,因为他们有广泛的积极潜力和光明的画面,可以作为替代建议,特别是关于印度尼西亚目前所经历的问题。本研究分析了2019年印度尼西亚辩论赛中的自信言语行为、形式和功能。本研究采用内容分析方法进行描述性定性研究。本研究的研究对象为辩论赛视频,数据对象为话语形式,显示了自信言语行为的结构。本研究的数据收集技术和程序为文件、录音和文字记录。用于分析数据的技术是描述性定性分析。结果表明,新闻句作为断言言语行为的强度最高,为77.85%,祈使句为12.14%,疑问句为10%。其次,state作为有影响力言语行为的函数,其权重最高为26.42%,显示为22.14%,通知为17.14%,建议为10.71%,确认为10.71%。本研究建议在高等教育和中等教育的教学材料中增加公众对自信言语行为的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
46.20%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The first journal of its kind, The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies publishes lesson and learning studies that are pedagogically aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning in formal educational settings. These studies may take the form of action research, design experiments, formative evaluations or pedagogical research more generally that is designed to foster a democratic, discursive and action orientated inquiry process. The editorial objective of the journal is to promote interdisciplinary and cross-national collaboration between groups of teacher educators, educational researchers and schoolteachers. The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies (IJLLS) is the official journal of the World Association of Lesson Studies (WALS). WALS is an association of educational researchers and teaching professionals from various countries in the world who are dedicated to educational research that focuses directly on improving the quality of learning in classrooms and other formal learning environments through pedagogical experiments or action research.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between teacher leadership and teacher learning in Japanese lesson study: focusing on the knowledge-creation process Bringing academic disciplines together to focus on literacy: a secondary school case study Practicing variation theory beyond learning study The potential of lesson study in enhancing secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical practices in lesson planning: evidence from Ethiopia The power of feedback in teacher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1