Should we “just stick to the facts”? The benefit of controversial conversations in classrooms

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Theory Into Practice Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1080/00405841.2022.2096381
Elizabeth Kraatz, Jacqueline von Spiegel, Robin C. Sayers, Anna C. Brady
{"title":"Should we “just stick to the facts”? The benefit of controversial conversations in classrooms","authors":"Elizabeth Kraatz, Jacqueline von Spiegel, Robin C. Sayers, Anna C. Brady","doi":"10.1080/00405841.2022.2096381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Controversial topics may be uncomfortable for teachers to include in their in-class discussions. However, there are considerable cognitive and social-emotional benefits to engagement in controversial conversations, or classroom discussion about controversial topics. It is critical that teachers support students in respectful discussion to help them develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and the ability to consider issues from multiple perspectives. These skills can enable students to meet larger educational goals such as engaged citizenship. The goal of this article is to highlight the benefits of controversial conversations in the classroom and describe teaching approaches that facilitate effective controversial conversations. First, we identify important factors for teachers’ consideration in supporting effective and beneficial controversial conversations. Second, we provide examples of topics of conversations that may be appropriate for students of varying ages. Third, we review how the structure of conversation, scaffolding, classroom context, relationships, and students’ individual differences can shape controversial conversations.","PeriodicalId":48177,"journal":{"name":"Theory Into Practice","volume":"106 1","pages":"312 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2096381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Controversial topics may be uncomfortable for teachers to include in their in-class discussions. However, there are considerable cognitive and social-emotional benefits to engagement in controversial conversations, or classroom discussion about controversial topics. It is critical that teachers support students in respectful discussion to help them develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and the ability to consider issues from multiple perspectives. These skills can enable students to meet larger educational goals such as engaged citizenship. The goal of this article is to highlight the benefits of controversial conversations in the classroom and describe teaching approaches that facilitate effective controversial conversations. First, we identify important factors for teachers’ consideration in supporting effective and beneficial controversial conversations. Second, we provide examples of topics of conversations that may be appropriate for students of varying ages. Third, we review how the structure of conversation, scaffolding, classroom context, relationships, and students’ individual differences can shape controversial conversations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们应该“坚持事实”吗?课堂上有争议的对话的好处
有争议的话题可能会让教师在课堂讨论中感到不舒服。然而,参与有争议的对话或关于有争议话题的课堂讨论有相当大的认知和社会情感益处。教师支持学生在尊重的讨论中帮助他们培养解决问题、批判性思维和从多个角度考虑问题的能力,这一点至关重要。这些技能可以使学生实现更大的教育目标,如参与公民。本文的目的是强调课堂上争议性对话的好处,并描述促进有效争议性对话的教学方法。首先,我们确定了教师在支持有效和有益的争议性对话时需要考虑的重要因素。其次,我们提供了适合不同年龄学生的对话主题示例。第三,我们回顾了对话的结构、框架、课堂环境、关系和学生的个体差异如何塑造有争议的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory Into Practice
Theory Into Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, Theory Into Practice (TIP) is a nationally recognized, peer reviewed journal featuring multiple perspectives and scholarly, yet practical and engaging, discussions of important issues in education. TIP publishes articles covering all levels and areas of education, including learning and teaching; counseling; assessment; teacher education and professional development; classroom management; administration and supervision; curriculum; policy; and technology. Each issue of TIP is devoted to a timely theme developed by a Guest Editor who has expertise in the theme area.
期刊最新文献
The rights of trans and queer learners in K-12 classrooms Equity, accountability and change in the school board space Centering community and care: Enacting the Torres’ rights of the learner to support middle grades students in building collective responsibility in learning mathematics A community sin vergüenza: Considerations when designing classroom spaces for bi/multilingual students to speak, listen, and be heard Rehumanizing mathematics education with the RotL through defiance, trust, and love: A conversation with Olga Torres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1