Operational Definition of a Causative Contact Allergen – A Study with Six Fragrance Allergens

J. Hostynek,, H. Maibach
{"title":"Operational Definition of a Causative Contact Allergen – A Study with Six Fragrance Allergens","authors":"J. Hostynek,, H. Maibach","doi":"10.1159/000081564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In practice, the clinical diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is often highly problematic with the identification of the specific allergen that has actually caused a patient’s particular dermatitic episode being even more difficult. A large number of reports in the literature are able to identify a number of substances to which the patient is allergic without clearly indicating a causal link to the patient’s current problem. For the reader of such reports, it is often difficult to judge if this link has been established, and for this reason, a number of criteria have been proposed to determine if reported positive patch test reactions are clinically relevant. These criteria include the degree of information given on the selection and condition of the patients, patch testing conditions, the intensity and duration of reactions, reactions occurring simultaneously to other patch test materials, the likelihood of confounding factors such as cross-reactions and excited skin occurring, linkage to specific consumer products or environmental sources of the putative allergen and follow-up with appropriate use testing. Criteria are also suggested for evaluating a substance’s allergenic potency from reports of predictive testing. These include the availability of details on the test methodology, maximization procedures, the selection criteria for test and control subjects and of the exact test scores. The applicability of these criteria are tested in separate publications on 6 fragrance allergens, for which information is provided on patch test concentrations.","PeriodicalId":12086,"journal":{"name":"Exogenous Dermatology","volume":"19 1","pages":"279 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exogenous Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000081564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In practice, the clinical diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is often highly problematic with the identification of the specific allergen that has actually caused a patient’s particular dermatitic episode being even more difficult. A large number of reports in the literature are able to identify a number of substances to which the patient is allergic without clearly indicating a causal link to the patient’s current problem. For the reader of such reports, it is often difficult to judge if this link has been established, and for this reason, a number of criteria have been proposed to determine if reported positive patch test reactions are clinically relevant. These criteria include the degree of information given on the selection and condition of the patients, patch testing conditions, the intensity and duration of reactions, reactions occurring simultaneously to other patch test materials, the likelihood of confounding factors such as cross-reactions and excited skin occurring, linkage to specific consumer products or environmental sources of the putative allergen and follow-up with appropriate use testing. Criteria are also suggested for evaluating a substance’s allergenic potency from reports of predictive testing. These include the availability of details on the test methodology, maximization procedures, the selection criteria for test and control subjects and of the exact test scores. The applicability of these criteria are tested in separate publications on 6 fragrance allergens, for which information is provided on patch test concentrations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种致病接触过敏原的操作定义——六种芳香过敏原的研究
在实践中,过敏性接触性皮炎的临床诊断常常是非常困难的,因为要确定实际导致患者特定皮炎发作的特定过敏原就更加困难了。文献中的大量报告能够确定患者过敏的一些物质,但没有明确指出与患者当前问题的因果关系。对于这些报告的读者来说,通常很难判断这种联系是否已经建立,因此,已经提出了一些标准来确定报告的阳性贴片试验反应是否与临床相关。这些标准包括所提供的关于患者选择和病情的信息程度、贴片试验条件、反应的强度和持续时间、与其他贴片试验材料同时发生的反应、交叉反应和皮肤兴奋等混杂因素发生的可能性、与特定消费品或假定过敏原的环境来源的联系,以及适当使用试验的随访。还建议从预测测试报告中评估物质致敏效力的标准。这些包括测试方法、最大化程序、测试和控制对象的选择标准以及确切的测试分数的可用性细节。这些标准的适用性在6种香水过敏原的单独出版物中进行了测试,并提供了有关斑贴试验浓度的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgement to Referees for Exogenous Dermatology 2004 Contents Vol. 3, 2004 Author Index Vol. 3, 2004 Is There Evidence that Geraniol Causes Allergic Contact Dermatitis? Subject Index Vol. 3, 2004
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1