Comparison between the Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint for the early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Lin Ran, Huimin Chen, Yuancheng Pan, Qing-jian Lin, F. Canavese, Shunyou Chen
{"title":"Comparison between the Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint for the early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip","authors":"Lin Ran, Huimin Chen, Yuancheng Pan, Qing-jian Lin, F. Canavese, Shunyou Chen","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint (Tübingen hip flexion splint) are two effective options for the early management of patients younger than 6 months of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients younger than 6 months of age with type IIb to IV DDH managed by Pavlik harness or Tübingen hip flexion splint. The Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups were comparable regarding the affected side (P = 0.09), Graf grade (P = 0.635), and age at initial treatment (P = 0.77). Overall, failure rates were 12 and 33% in Pavlik harness (4/33 hips) and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups (14/43 hips), respectively (P = 0.038). No cases of avascular necrosis (AVN) were found in either group. In the Tübingen hip flexion splint group, the failure rate was significantly higher in bilateral cases (66.6%; P = 0.004), in severe forms (Graf grade IV hips; P ≤ 0.0001), and in patients with lower age at initial treatment (67.7 ± 39.3 days; P = 0.005). The average follow-up time was 30.35 ± 3.58 months (range: 24–36). At the last follow-up visit, no statistically significant differences were found between the Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups regarding the acetabular index (t = 0.632; P = 0.53) or center-edge angle (Z = −0.303; P = 0.762). Our study showed that both the brace treatments for DDH in children younger than 6 months of age were effective and well tolerated. However, Tübingen hip flexion splint should not be used in patients with severe forms of DDH (Graf grade IV hips).","PeriodicalId":16709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","volume":"1 1","pages":"424 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint (Tübingen hip flexion splint) are two effective options for the early management of patients younger than 6 months of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients younger than 6 months of age with type IIb to IV DDH managed by Pavlik harness or Tübingen hip flexion splint. The Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups were comparable regarding the affected side (P = 0.09), Graf grade (P = 0.635), and age at initial treatment (P = 0.77). Overall, failure rates were 12 and 33% in Pavlik harness (4/33 hips) and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups (14/43 hips), respectively (P = 0.038). No cases of avascular necrosis (AVN) were found in either group. In the Tübingen hip flexion splint group, the failure rate was significantly higher in bilateral cases (66.6%; P = 0.004), in severe forms (Graf grade IV hips; P ≤ 0.0001), and in patients with lower age at initial treatment (67.7 ± 39.3 days; P = 0.005). The average follow-up time was 30.35 ± 3.58 months (range: 24–36). At the last follow-up visit, no statistically significant differences were found between the Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups regarding the acetabular index (t = 0.632; P = 0.53) or center-edge angle (Z = −0.303; P = 0.762). Our study showed that both the brace treatments for DDH in children younger than 6 months of age were effective and well tolerated. However, Tübingen hip flexion splint should not be used in patients with severe forms of DDH (Graf grade IV hips).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pavlik托具与t宾根髋关节屈曲夹板早期治疗髋关节发育不良的比较
Pavlik托具和t宾根髋关节屈曲夹板(t宾根髋关节屈曲夹板)是早期治疗年龄小于6个月的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者的两种有效选择。本研究的主要目的是评估年龄小于6个月的IIb至IV型DDH患者的临床和放射学结果,这些患者使用Pavlik套具或t bingen髋关节屈曲夹板。Pavlik套和t bingen髋关节屈曲夹板组在受影响侧(P = 0.09)、Graf分级(P = 0.635)和初始治疗年龄(P = 0.77)方面具有可比性。总体而言,Pavlik组(4/33髋)和tbingen组(14/43髋)的失败率分别为12%和33% (P = 0.038)。两组均未见血管坏死(AVN)。在宾根髋关节屈曲夹板组中,双侧病例的失败率明显更高(66.6%;P = 0.004),严重时(Graf IV级髋;P≤0.0001),初始治疗年龄较低的患者(67.7±39.3天;p = 0.005)。平均随访时间30.35±3.58个月(24 ~ 36个月)。最后一次随访时,Pavlik组与t bingen髋屈曲夹板组髋臼指数差异无统计学意义(t = 0.632;P = 0.53)或中心边缘角(Z = - 0.303;p = 0.762)。我们的研究表明,这两种支具治疗年龄小于6个月的儿童DDH是有效的,耐受性良好。然而,宾根髋关节屈曲夹板不应用于严重DDH (Graf级IV髋)的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lateral column lengthening’ by Torrez et al. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography, and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures Letter to the editor, concerning Cimen et al.: ‘Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia’ Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1