Investigating Mental Models of Cataloguers as the First Step Towards the Development of Intuitive Cataloguer's Tools

Mihela Pauman Budanovic, M. Zumer
{"title":"Investigating Mental Models of Cataloguers as the First Step Towards the Development of Intuitive Cataloguer's Tools","authors":"Mihela Pauman Budanovic, M. Zumer","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The roles library professionals play in bibliographic information systems are constantly evolving with the changing information environment and demanding users. In terms of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998), the new paradigm relating to the bibliographic universe is driving new requirements for data preparation and that represents a dramatic change in how cataloguers think; in other words, in their mental models (Rose, 2012: 129). Therefore, a study of the cataloguers’ mental models of the bibliographic universe was carried out to investigate whether the FRBR structure would be confirmed by mental models of cataloguers. Our method for elicitation of mental models is based on concept mapping, which is well suited for representing mental models of individuals (Jackson & Trochim, 2002: 312). The findings of our study show that on average cataloguers’ mental models resemble the FRBR conceptual model.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"61 1","pages":"106-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The roles library professionals play in bibliographic information systems are constantly evolving with the changing information environment and demanding users. In terms of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998), the new paradigm relating to the bibliographic universe is driving new requirements for data preparation and that represents a dramatic change in how cataloguers think; in other words, in their mental models (Rose, 2012: 129). Therefore, a study of the cataloguers’ mental models of the bibliographic universe was carried out to investigate whether the FRBR structure would be confirmed by mental models of cataloguers. Our method for elicitation of mental models is based on concept mapping, which is well suited for representing mental models of individuals (Jackson & Trochim, 2002: 312). The findings of our study show that on average cataloguers’ mental models resemble the FRBR conceptual model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究编目员的心理模型:开发直观编目工具的第一步
随着信息环境和用户需求的变化,图书馆专业人员在书目信息系统中的角色也在不断演变。就《书目记录功能需求》(FRBR)(1998)而言,与书目领域有关的新范式正在推动对数据准备的新需求,这代表了编目人员思维方式的巨大变化;换句话说,在他们的心智模式中(Rose, 2012: 129)。因此,本文对编目员的书目宇宙心理模型进行了研究,探讨编目员的FRBR结构是否会被编目员的心理模型所证实。我们的心理模型的启发方法是基于概念映射,这非常适合于表示个人的心理模型(Jackson & Trochim, 2002: 312)。我们的研究结果表明,平均而言,编目员的心智模型与FRBR概念模型相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1