Forced-Voluntary Return

Q1 Social Sciences Migration and Society Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.3167/arms.2022.050103
Tanya Aberman
{"title":"Forced-Voluntary Return","authors":"Tanya Aberman","doi":"10.3167/arms.2022.050103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the near decade of Conservative rule in Canada from 2006 to 2015, anti-refugee and anti-migrant discourse was continuously circulated by government officials. Social, economic, and physical restrictions were implemented based on the dichotomy of “deserving” versus “undeserving” migrants, and borders were created within communities. This article takes an intersectional approach to explore the reasons that some migrants chose to leave Canada “voluntarily” during that time, and the factors that forced them to do so. I offer the concept of forced-voluntary return to capture some of the tensions and messiness within migrant experiences that are neither completely voluntary nor forced. These tensions affirm the emerging calls in research to conceptualize migration on a spectrum from forced to voluntary, and contribute to understandings of migration management, the production of deportability, and the “voluntary” mobility of migrants by highlighting some of the ways in which intersecting identities impact migrants’ decisions about return.","PeriodicalId":52702,"journal":{"name":"Migration and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/arms.2022.050103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the near decade of Conservative rule in Canada from 2006 to 2015, anti-refugee and anti-migrant discourse was continuously circulated by government officials. Social, economic, and physical restrictions were implemented based on the dichotomy of “deserving” versus “undeserving” migrants, and borders were created within communities. This article takes an intersectional approach to explore the reasons that some migrants chose to leave Canada “voluntarily” during that time, and the factors that forced them to do so. I offer the concept of forced-voluntary return to capture some of the tensions and messiness within migrant experiences that are neither completely voluntary nor forced. These tensions affirm the emerging calls in research to conceptualize migration on a spectrum from forced to voluntary, and contribute to understandings of migration management, the production of deportability, and the “voluntary” mobility of migrants by highlighting some of the ways in which intersecting identities impact migrants’ decisions about return.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forced-Voluntary返回
在2006年至2015年加拿大保守党执政的近十年中,反难民和反移民的言论在政府官员中不断传播。基于“值得”和“不值得”移民的二分法,实施了社会、经济和人身限制,并在社区内建立了边界。本文采用交叉的方法来探讨一些移民在那段时间选择“自愿”离开加拿大的原因,以及迫使他们这样做的因素。我提出强迫-自愿回归的概念,是为了捕捉移民经历中的一些紧张和混乱,这些经历既不是完全自愿的,也不是完全被迫的。这些紧张关系肯定了研究中出现的将移民从被迫到自愿的范围概念化的呼声,并通过强调交叉身份影响移民关于返回的决定的一些方式,有助于理解移民管理、可遣返性的产生和移民的“自愿”流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The “Transnational Business of Death” Among Somali Migrants in the Streets of Athens Enacting “Bottom-up” Solidarity in Labor Market Integration for Refugees in England The Gendered Necropolitics of Migration Control in a French Postcolonial Periphery Writing as Living On Using Photovoice to Explore Migrant Women's Sociospatial Engagement in Diverse Local Urban Areas of Santiago, Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1