A brief history of British drug policy: 1850-1950

IF 0.1 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Therapeutic Communities Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI:10.1108/tc-11-2019-0013
Rowdy Yates
{"title":"A brief history of British drug policy: 1850-1950","authors":"Rowdy Yates","doi":"10.1108/tc-11-2019-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the clamour within the drug treatment field in the UK – and throughout much of Europe – increases, leading agencies are arguing for a review of the current legislation and a change in focus away from criminal justice and towards a more public health understanding of addiction. Therapeutic communities have found themselves united with many drug users-led campaigns to argue for a wholesale restructuring of the legislative, policy and funding arrangements which recognises the role of recovery-oriented interventions within the mix. Given these on-going debates, it is perhaps useful to understand how the current arrangements were established [1].,In 1850s, the sale of opium – like alcohol – was largely unregulated. It was widely used, in a variety of preparations, by all classes for medical and non-medical purposes. A pennyworth of opium was as likely (perhaps more likely) as a pound of potatoes to find its way into the weekly shopping basket.,By the 1920s, the Fu Manchu novels of Sax Rohmer – with their tales of innocent English virgins being seduced into crime and sexual perversion by an evil Chinese genius who lurked within the opium dens of Edwardian Britain – had redefined opium as a drug of the outside, the deadly, an agent in the enslavement of innocence.,This dramatic change was largely brought about by the introduction of an array of new medications and a move away from traditional “herbal” remedies. This change was accelerated by the experiences of the First World War and underpinned by the print media and laid the foundations of the legislation and policy of the present day.","PeriodicalId":43236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Communities","volume":"1 1","pages":"57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tc-11-2019-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As the clamour within the drug treatment field in the UK – and throughout much of Europe – increases, leading agencies are arguing for a review of the current legislation and a change in focus away from criminal justice and towards a more public health understanding of addiction. Therapeutic communities have found themselves united with many drug users-led campaigns to argue for a wholesale restructuring of the legislative, policy and funding arrangements which recognises the role of recovery-oriented interventions within the mix. Given these on-going debates, it is perhaps useful to understand how the current arrangements were established [1].,In 1850s, the sale of opium – like alcohol – was largely unregulated. It was widely used, in a variety of preparations, by all classes for medical and non-medical purposes. A pennyworth of opium was as likely (perhaps more likely) as a pound of potatoes to find its way into the weekly shopping basket.,By the 1920s, the Fu Manchu novels of Sax Rohmer – with their tales of innocent English virgins being seduced into crime and sexual perversion by an evil Chinese genius who lurked within the opium dens of Edwardian Britain – had redefined opium as a drug of the outside, the deadly, an agent in the enslavement of innocence.,This dramatic change was largely brought about by the introduction of an array of new medications and a move away from traditional “herbal” remedies. This change was accelerated by the experiences of the First World War and underpinned by the print media and laid the foundations of the legislation and policy of the present day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国毒品政策简史:1850-1950
随着英国以及欧洲大部分地区对药物治疗领域的呼声越来越高,主要机构正在主张对现行立法进行审查,并将重点从刑事司法转移到对成瘾的更公共卫生的理解上。治疗社区发现自己与许多由吸毒者主导的运动联合起来,主张对立法、政策和资金安排进行大规模重组,承认以康复为导向的干预措施在这一组合中的作用。鉴于这些正在进行的辩论,了解目前的安排是如何建立的也许是有用的[1]。19世纪50年代,鸦片的销售——就像酒精一样——基本上是不受管制的。它被广泛用于各种各样的制剂,被所有阶层用于医疗和非医疗目的。一便士的鸦片和一磅土豆一样(也许更有可能)进入每周的购物篮。到20世纪20年代,萨克斯·侯麦(Sax Rohmer)的傅满清小说——讲述了一个潜伏在爱德华七世时代英国鸦片窟里的邪恶中国天才引诱无辜的英国处女犯罪和性滥交的故事——重新定义了鸦片是一种外部毒品,致命的,是奴役纯真的代理人。这种戏剧性的变化主要是由于一系列新药物的引入和对传统“草药”疗法的抛弃。第一次世界大战的经历加速了这一变化,并得到了印刷媒体的支持,为当今的立法和政策奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Communities
Therapeutic Communities SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes academic papers, case studies, empirical research and opinion. The Journal is interested in publishing papers that critically creatively engage with ideas drawn from a range of discourses: the therapeutic community movement and other related professional practice, psychoanalysis, art, literature, poetry, music, architecture, culture, education, philosophy, religion and environmental studies. It will be of value to those who work in health services, social services, voluntary and charitable organizations and for all professionals involved with staff teams in therapeutic and supportive organizations.
期刊最新文献
The Northfield Experiments and the therapeutic community task A critical review of the antecedents of enabling communities Thematic group activities: accommodating the individual needs of clients undergoing therapeutic community approach in Indonesia Looking forward to 2023 Perceived effectiveness of therapeutic community model as a rehabilitation approach for Sri Lankan individuals with substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1