The Šenov-Salaš 1 and 4 Upper Palaeolithic sites and settlement and procurement strategies in the Aurignacian of the Moravian Gate

Martin Moník, Jiří Drozd, A. Pankowská
{"title":"The Šenov-Salaš 1 and 4 Upper Palaeolithic sites and settlement and procurement strategies in the Aurignacian of the Moravian Gate","authors":"Martin Moník, Jiří Drozd, A. Pankowská","doi":"10.1556/072.2022.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Techno-typological analysis of two chipped stone assemblages from Šenov-Salaš 1 and 4 in the Moravian Gate (Czech Republic) indicates they belong to the Aurignacian. The two assemblages, preferentially made of Baltic (erratic) flints, comprise few distinctive tool types, though. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare their raw material strategy, tool typology, and topography with other Moravian Aurignacian sites. It transpired that they answer to other Aurignacian sites in their specific topography, raw material strategy, and (a few) Aurignacian endscrapers, but both assemblages comprise few carinated burins. The altitude here is somewhat higher than that for most Moravian Aurignacian sites, but it is still probable that the two assemblages belong to the Aurignacian and that their rather atypical aspect (the small dimensions of artefacts, simple core preparation, few distinctive tools) are due to the small size of the processed flint nodules, which did not allow for thorough core preparation. Predominant plain butts, the virtual absence of archaic, or other distinctive tool types speak for either Evolved Aurignacian or some specific Aurignacian facies of the Moravian Gate. The assemblages cannot be linked with the young AMS 14C date 14 270 ± 40 uncal BP, acquired from a bone from the surface at Salaš 1, just slightly preceding the Moravian Magdalenian, as such a date would be too young not only for any Aurignacian but also for Epiaurignacian sites. Still, the Aurignacian estimation of the assemblages is interesting as the Moravian Gate comprises relatively few sites attributed to this Upper Palaeolithic culture.","PeriodicalId":35002,"journal":{"name":"Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/072.2022.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Techno-typological analysis of two chipped stone assemblages from Šenov-Salaš 1 and 4 in the Moravian Gate (Czech Republic) indicates they belong to the Aurignacian. The two assemblages, preferentially made of Baltic (erratic) flints, comprise few distinctive tool types, though. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare their raw material strategy, tool typology, and topography with other Moravian Aurignacian sites. It transpired that they answer to other Aurignacian sites in their specific topography, raw material strategy, and (a few) Aurignacian endscrapers, but both assemblages comprise few carinated burins. The altitude here is somewhat higher than that for most Moravian Aurignacian sites, but it is still probable that the two assemblages belong to the Aurignacian and that their rather atypical aspect (the small dimensions of artefacts, simple core preparation, few distinctive tools) are due to the small size of the processed flint nodules, which did not allow for thorough core preparation. Predominant plain butts, the virtual absence of archaic, or other distinctive tool types speak for either Evolved Aurignacian or some specific Aurignacian facies of the Moravian Gate. The assemblages cannot be linked with the young AMS 14C date 14 270 ± 40 uncal BP, acquired from a bone from the surface at Salaš 1, just slightly preceding the Moravian Magdalenian, as such a date would be too young not only for any Aurignacian but also for Epiaurignacian sites. Still, the Aurignacian estimation of the assemblages is interesting as the Moravian Gate comprises relatively few sites attributed to this Upper Palaeolithic culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Šenov-Salaš 1和4旧石器时代晚期遗址以及摩拉维亚门奥里尼亚纪的定居和采购策略
对捷克摩拉维亚门Šenov-Salaš 1和Šenov-Salaš 4出土的两组碎块石进行技术类型学分析,表明它们属于奥里尼亚期。这两种组合主要由波罗的海(不稳定)燧石制成,但几乎没有独特的工具类型。对其原材料策略、工具类型和地形与其他摩拉维亚奥里尼亚遗址进行了统计分析。据了解,它们在其特定的地形、原材料策略和(少数)奥日尼亚期末端石方面与其他奥日尼亚期遗址相似,但这两种组合都包含很少的碳化燃烧。这里的海拔高度比大多数摩拉维亚奥里尼亚纪遗址略高,但仍有可能这两个组合属于奥里尼亚纪,它们相当不典型的方面(人工制品尺寸小,岩心制备简单,几乎没有独特的工具)是由于加工过的燧石结核尺寸小,不允许进行彻底的岩心制备。主要的平原顶,几乎没有古代或其他独特的工具类型,说明了摩拉维亚门的演化奥日尼亚期或某些特定的奥日尼亚期相。这些组合不能与年轻的AMS 14C(14270±40伯伯BP)联系起来,该14C是从萨拉什1号地表的一块骨头中获得的,仅略早于摩拉维亚马达莱期,因为这样的日期不仅对任何奥日尼亚纪,而且对表奥日尼亚纪遗址来说都太年轻了。尽管如此,奥里尼亚纪对这些组合的估计还是很有趣的,因为摩拉维亚门包含了相对较少的属于旧石器时代晚期文化的遗址。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The periodical is devoted to the results achieved by Hungarian archaeologists. It covers studies of the most important excavations, finds and problems of the period from the Paleolithic to the Middle Ages. It contains, further, short papers on individual finds and comprehensive reports on the single fields of research, as well. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Lochner, Michaela (Hrsg.), Brandbestattung und Bronzemetallurgie. Die Urnenfelderkultur in Niederösterreich (1300–800 v. Chr.) Miklós Szabó (1940–2023) Pannonian women's headwear-related accessories Roman glass bowls from Intercisa Recent research on Roman Pannonia and Pavel Oliva
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1