Discrimination and Insurance

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Connecticut Insurance Law Journal Pub Date : 2017-12-18 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3089946
R. Avraham
{"title":"Discrimination and Insurance","authors":"R. Avraham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3089946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it fair and just to charge men and women identical life insurance premiums despite their different actuarial risk? What about charging the old and the young different premiums? As entities whose core business is to classify people based on their actuarial risk, should private insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate between various groups? To answer these and various other questions, I start this chapter by revealing the complete confusion that exists in the legal terrain with respect to antidiscrimination norms in insurance. I then show how philosophers writing about discrimination mostly have been writing at a level of abstraction so high that it comfortably ignores relevant nuances, thus making the entire literature largely useless for any insurance-related policy-making purposes. I conclude by proposing a theoretical framework that can help policy makers apply a fair and just anti-discrimination policy.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Is it fair and just to charge men and women identical life insurance premiums despite their different actuarial risk? What about charging the old and the young different premiums? As entities whose core business is to classify people based on their actuarial risk, should private insurance companies not be allowed to discriminate between various groups? To answer these and various other questions, I start this chapter by revealing the complete confusion that exists in the legal terrain with respect to antidiscrimination norms in insurance. I then show how philosophers writing about discrimination mostly have been writing at a level of abstraction so high that it comfortably ignores relevant nuances, thus making the entire literature largely useless for any insurance-related policy-making purposes. I conclude by proposing a theoretical framework that can help policy makers apply a fair and just anti-discrimination policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歧视与保险
尽管男性和女性的精算风险不同,但收取相同的人寿保险费是否公平公正?对老年人和年轻人收取不同的保费怎么样?私营保险公司的核心业务是根据精算风险对人群进行分类,是否应允许私营保险公司区别对待不同的群体?为了回答这些问题和其他各种各样的问题,我在本章开始时揭示了在法律领域中存在的关于保险反歧视规范的完全混乱。然后,我展示了哲学家们在写关于歧视的文章时,大多是在一个如此抽象的水平上写作的,以至于它轻松地忽略了相关的细微差别,从而使整个文献在很大程度上对任何与保险相关的政策制定目的毫无用处。最后,我提出了一个理论框架,可以帮助政策制定者实施公平公正的反歧视政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demand for Health Insurance in the Time of COVID-19: Evidence from the Special Enrollment Period in the Washington State ACA Marketplace Licensing the Insured: Providing Driver Licenses to Unauthorized Immigrants Has Not Impacted Auto Insurance in California Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Time to Renew . . . or Rethink? Loss of ‘Unattended Property in a Public Place’ – Testing the Good Faith of the Travel Insurer The Insurance Business in Transition to the Physical-Cyber Market: Communication, Coordination and Harmonization of Cyber Risk Coverages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1