Paradoxes of Happiness: Why People Feel More Comfortable With High Inequalities and High Murder Rates?

V. Popov
{"title":"Paradoxes of Happiness: Why People Feel More Comfortable With High Inequalities and High Murder Rates?","authors":"V. Popov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3189030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is evidence that income and wealth inequalities are positively associated with happiness, as measured by the happiness index, and negatively associated with the suicide rate (that is considered an objective indicator of unhappiness). Moreover, there is some evidence that happiness is also positively linked the murder rate, especially when it goes hand in hand with inequalities. The possible explanation – competitive nature of human beings (a modification of a “big fish in the small pond” story) and perceptions of social justice: not only people enjoy the better than average position more than an even higher, but below the average position, but they also cherish the dream of becoming better than average. Greater equality that undermines the dream of becoming higher than average turns out to be disappointing for many. If murders occur without high income inequalities (i.e. murders are “unjustified”) and/or inequalities exist without high murders (inequalities are not perceived as unfair and do not cause social tension), then happiness is not affected.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3189030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is evidence that income and wealth inequalities are positively associated with happiness, as measured by the happiness index, and negatively associated with the suicide rate (that is considered an objective indicator of unhappiness). Moreover, there is some evidence that happiness is also positively linked the murder rate, especially when it goes hand in hand with inequalities. The possible explanation – competitive nature of human beings (a modification of a “big fish in the small pond” story) and perceptions of social justice: not only people enjoy the better than average position more than an even higher, but below the average position, but they also cherish the dream of becoming better than average. Greater equality that undermines the dream of becoming higher than average turns out to be disappointing for many. If murders occur without high income inequalities (i.e. murders are “unjustified”) and/or inequalities exist without high murders (inequalities are not perceived as unfair and do not cause social tension), then happiness is not affected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸福的悖论:为什么人们对高不平等和高谋杀率感到更舒服?
有证据表明,收入和财富不平等与幸福指数呈正相关,与自杀率呈负相关(自杀率被认为是不幸福的客观指标)。此外,有证据表明,幸福也与谋杀率呈正相关,尤其是当它与不平等密切相关时。可能的解释是——人类的竞争天性(对“小池塘里的大鱼”故事的修改)和对社会正义的看法:人们不仅享受比平均水平更好的地位,甚至比平均水平更高,但低于平均水平,但他们也珍惜成为比平均水平更好的梦想。更大的平等破坏了成为高于平均水平的梦想,结果令许多人失望。如果谋杀的发生没有高收入不平等(即谋杀是“不合理的”)和/或不平等的存在没有高谋杀(不平等不被认为是不公平的,不会引起社会紧张),那么幸福就不会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Overconfidence in Public Information The Compliance Consequences of Fault Assignment in Sanctions Examining the Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Performance of Employees in the Private Schools, Mediated by Workplace Environment An Ordinal Theory of Risk and Correlation Aversion Persuasion Under Costly Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1