Performing with Plants in the Ob-scene Anthropocene

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER Nordic Theatre Studies Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI:10.7146/nts.v32i1.120411
Annette Arlander
{"title":"Performing with Plants in the Ob-scene Anthropocene","authors":"Annette Arlander","doi":"10.7146/nts.v32i1.120411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is there a way for the anthropocentric and anthropomorphic art form par excellence, the theatre, or performance art for that matter, to expand beyond their human and humanist bias? Is the term Anthropocene in any way useful for theatre and performance studies or performance-as-research? \nIn the anthology Anthropocene Feminism (Grusin 2017) Rosi Braidotti proposes four theses for a posthumanist feminism: 1) feminism is not a humanism, 2) anthropos is off-center, 3) zoe is the ruling principle, 4) sexuality is a force beyond gender. These assertions can undoubtedly be put on stage, but do they have relevance for developing or understanding performance practices off-stage and off-center, such as those trying to explore alternative ways and sites of performing, like performing with plants? \nIn this text, I examine Braidotti’s affirmative theses and explore their usefulness with regard to performance analysis, use some of my experiments in the artistic research project “Performing with plants” as examples, and consider what the implications and possible uses of these theses are for our understanding of performances with other-than-human entities, which we share our planet with.","PeriodicalId":53807,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Theatre Studies","volume":"1957 1","pages":"121-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Theatre Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v32i1.120411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Is there a way for the anthropocentric and anthropomorphic art form par excellence, the theatre, or performance art for that matter, to expand beyond their human and humanist bias? Is the term Anthropocene in any way useful for theatre and performance studies or performance-as-research? In the anthology Anthropocene Feminism (Grusin 2017) Rosi Braidotti proposes four theses for a posthumanist feminism: 1) feminism is not a humanism, 2) anthropos is off-center, 3) zoe is the ruling principle, 4) sexuality is a force beyond gender. These assertions can undoubtedly be put on stage, but do they have relevance for developing or understanding performance practices off-stage and off-center, such as those trying to explore alternative ways and sites of performing, like performing with plants? In this text, I examine Braidotti’s affirmative theses and explore their usefulness with regard to performance analysis, use some of my experiments in the artistic research project “Performing with plants” as examples, and consider what the implications and possible uses of these theses are for our understanding of performances with other-than-human entities, which we share our planet with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Ob-scene人类世中与植物一起表演
人类中心主义和拟人化的艺术形式,即戏剧或表演艺术,是否有办法超越它们对人类和人文主义的偏见?“人类世”这个词对戏剧和表演研究或表演研究有用吗?在《人类世女性主义》(2017年出版)一书中,罗西•布莱多蒂为后人类主义女性主义提出了四个论点:1)女性主义不是人文主义,2)人类主义偏离中心,3)zoe是主导原则,4)性是一种超越性别的力量。毫无疑问,这些主张可以放在舞台上,但它们是否与发展或理解舞台外和中心以外的表演实践有关,比如那些试图探索其他表演方式和场所的表演,比如用植物表演?在本文中,我考察了Braidotti的肯定论点,并探讨了它们在行为分析方面的有用性,以我在艺术研究项目“与植物一起表演”中的一些实验为例,并考虑了这些论点对我们理解与我们共享地球的非人类实体的表演的影响和可能的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
“Ready to fly with a lust for life” Utopian Realism Late Nineteenth-Century Radical Utopias in Theatre Reviews Magic of Presence When the Utopian Performative Encounters Beauty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1