Evaluation of Recycled Materials as Aggregate of End Bearing Stone Columns: a Comparative Study

A. Haddad, M. Shahverdi
{"title":"Evaluation of Recycled Materials as Aggregate of End Bearing Stone Columns: a Comparative Study","authors":"A. Haddad, M. Shahverdi","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2021.21286.1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this research is to compare the behavior of floating and end bearing stone columns made of recycled aggregates of building debris with natural aggregate. To do so, both types of stone columns were constructed by crushed concrete and crushed brick as recycled aggregates and compared with the same models made of gravel as natural aggregates. All the columns were constructed with the same size, density, and grading in a clay bed. To evaluate the initial quality of materials of the stone columns, the index tests were performed. The results of such tests illustrated the less resistance of recycled materials in comparison to the natural materials; On the contrary, according to the results of the index tests, crushed bricks are not recommended to construct stone columns. Despite the index tests, results of loading on a floating column filed with natural and recycled aggregate were approximately the same, but the bearing capacity of the end bearing column made of natural aggregates was higher than the same model made of recycled aggregates.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2021.21286.1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of this research is to compare the behavior of floating and end bearing stone columns made of recycled aggregates of building debris with natural aggregate. To do so, both types of stone columns were constructed by crushed concrete and crushed brick as recycled aggregates and compared with the same models made of gravel as natural aggregates. All the columns were constructed with the same size, density, and grading in a clay bed. To evaluate the initial quality of materials of the stone columns, the index tests were performed. The results of such tests illustrated the less resistance of recycled materials in comparison to the natural materials; On the contrary, according to the results of the index tests, crushed bricks are not recommended to construct stone columns. Despite the index tests, results of loading on a floating column filed with natural and recycled aggregate were approximately the same, but the bearing capacity of the end bearing column made of natural aggregates was higher than the same model made of recycled aggregates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再生材料作为端承石柱骨料的评价:比较研究
本研究的目的是比较建筑碎片再生骨料与天然骨料制成的浮柱和端承石柱的性能。为了做到这一点,两种类型的石柱都是由破碎的混凝土和破碎的砖作为再生骨料建造的,并与由砾石作为天然骨料制成的相同模型进行比较。所有的柱子都是在粘土层中以相同的尺寸、密度和分级建造的。为了评价石柱的初始材料质量,进行了指标试验。这些试验的结果表明,与天然材料相比,回收材料的阻力较小;相反,根据指标试验结果,不建议用碎砖砌筑石柱。尽管进行了指标试验,但天然骨料和再生骨料浇筑的浮柱加载结果基本相同,但天然骨料浇筑的端部承载柱的承载力高于同样型号的再生骨料浇筑的端部承载柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Damage Sensitive-Stories of RC and Steel Frames under Critical Mainshock-Aftershock Ground Motions Evaluation of Intermediate Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame subjected to Truck collision Damage Detection in Prestressed Concrete Slabs Using Wavelet Analysis of Vibration Responses in the Time Domain Rehabilitation of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Elements by Rebar Replacement Risk assessment and challenges faced in repairs and rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1