Making Justice Fundamental: Teacher Educators’ Journey to Reimagine Accountability

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studying Teacher Education Pub Date : 2023-02-05 DOI:10.1080/17425964.2022.2157396
R. Degener, Karen Colum
{"title":"Making Justice Fundamental: Teacher Educators’ Journey to Reimagine Accountability","authors":"R. Degener, Karen Colum","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2022.2157396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article describes the journey of two teacher educators to reconstruct our knowledge about grading and shift justice from ornamental to fundamental in our teacher preparation methods courses. This work attempts to answer the call from scholars, who have been advocating for educators to be more prepared to meet the needs of a diverse student population. Despite these long-standing calls from scholars, teacher education programs, including the use of traditional grading methods, continue to uphold whiteness. We utilize a self-study methodology to document how we reimagined our grading practices in teacher preparation methods courses from perpetuating whiteness to centering justice. Drawing on principles of liberatory education, we designed a new accountability measure to invoke action and hold pre-service teachers accountable for growth toward anti-oppressive dispositions by taking ownership of their learning through the documentation of their learning and self-assessment of their continued progress. We discuss shifts in our own pedagogy, practices, and beliefs as a result. We also analyze the tensions of engaging in our efforts to adopt an alternative, justice-oriented grading method as white teacher educators and in teacher preparation classrooms that are predominately white, middle-class female pre-service teachers.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"147 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2157396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article describes the journey of two teacher educators to reconstruct our knowledge about grading and shift justice from ornamental to fundamental in our teacher preparation methods courses. This work attempts to answer the call from scholars, who have been advocating for educators to be more prepared to meet the needs of a diverse student population. Despite these long-standing calls from scholars, teacher education programs, including the use of traditional grading methods, continue to uphold whiteness. We utilize a self-study methodology to document how we reimagined our grading practices in teacher preparation methods courses from perpetuating whiteness to centering justice. Drawing on principles of liberatory education, we designed a new accountability measure to invoke action and hold pre-service teachers accountable for growth toward anti-oppressive dispositions by taking ownership of their learning through the documentation of their learning and self-assessment of their continued progress. We discuss shifts in our own pedagogy, practices, and beliefs as a result. We also analyze the tensions of engaging in our efforts to adopt an alternative, justice-oriented grading method as white teacher educators and in teacher preparation classrooms that are predominately white, middle-class female pre-service teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使正义成为根本:教师教育工作者重新构想问责制之旅
本文描述了两位教师教育家在教师备考方法课程中重构我们对评分的认识,并将公正从观赏性转向基础性的历程。这项工作试图回应学者们的呼吁,他们一直在倡导教育工作者做好更多准备,以满足多样化学生群体的需求。尽管学者们长期以来一直在呼吁,教师教育计划,包括使用传统的评分方法,仍然坚持白人。我们利用一种自学方法来记录我们如何重新想象我们在教师准备方法课程中的评分实践,从延续白人到以正义为中心。根据自由教育的原则,我们设计了一种新的问责制措施,通过记录他们的学习和对他们持续进步的自我评估,采取行动,让职前教师对反压迫倾向的成长负责。我们讨论了我们自己的教学、实践和信仰的转变。我们还分析了在白人教师教育工作者和以白人中产阶级女性职前教师为主的教师预备课堂中,我们努力采用一种替代的、以公正为导向的评分方法所带来的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Methods, Data Collection, and Trustworthiness in Self-Study Research: A Content Analysis of the First 19 Volumes of Studying Teacher Education Self-Study As Reflective Practice and Active Engagement Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) As a Critical Friend: The Affordances and Limitations Self-Study Navigating Boundaries of Race, Culture, Language and Context Experiencing Tensions When Integrating Language Diversity into Mathematics Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1