Accès à la liste d’attente de greffe rénale des patients en dialyse péritonéale de Nouvelle-Calédonie et Wallis et Futuna

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nephrologie & Therapeutique Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nephro.2022.01.005
Noémie Baroux , Marin Le Mee , Fadi Haidar
{"title":"Accès à la liste d’attente de greffe rénale des patients en dialyse péritonéale de Nouvelle-Calédonie et Wallis et Futuna","authors":"Noémie Baroux ,&nbsp;Marin Le Mee ,&nbsp;Fadi Haidar","doi":"10.1016/j.nephro.2022.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since 2012, a deceased donor kidney transplant program exists for dialysis patients living in New-Caledonia in collaboration with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia. This program has reduced the time spent out-of-territory for a renal transplantation and has reduced the economic burden of end stage renal disease in New-Caledonia. We have realised a photography of kidney transplants evaluation for patients in peritoneal dialysis in New-Caledonia and Wallis and Futuna. The first aim was to describe access to kidney transplants evaluation for dialysis patients. A second aim was to compare patients with a conformed kidney transplant evaluation and patients without transplant evaluation with no obvious reasons identified.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>All patients in peritoneal dialysis in New-Caledonia and Wallis and Futuna at the 2018, 31<sup>st</sup> july were included. A standardised form was filled by two nephrologists. The computerised shared medical record was used to collect information. A kidney transplant evaluation was adequate for patients registered on transplant waiting list, patients with medical contraindications identified or patients with evaluation exams begun less than 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 61 patients were included. The average age was 62 years old. The chronic kidney disease care average time was 6.7 years and the dialysis average time was 2.0 years. Among them, 11 (18 %) were registered on the waiting list, 26 (43 %) had at least one kidney transplant medical contraindication, 3 (5 %) had begun transplant exam since less than 6 months and 21 (34 %) had no transplant exam begun or transplant exam begun since more than 6 months without medical contraindication identified. Among those 21 patients, the three most common reasons were a faulty programming transplant exam (67 %; <em>n</em> = 14), a remote living place (48 %; <em>n</em> = 10) and an intercurrent health event (29 %; <em>n</em> = 6). Among patients living in Noumea and suburbs, 74 % had a conformed transplant evaluation against 44 % in patients living outside Noumea and suburbs (<em>P</em> = 0.058). Nearly one in two patients not on the waiting list had have no information about kidney graft or the information was not recorded in the medical record.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed two main factors of a non-conformed transplantation evaluation: living outside Noumea and suburbs and a non-efficient planning of pre-transplant assessment exams. There is also a lack of information to the patient. These risk factors for late registration and non-registration must be considered by the healthcare teams. This study will provide a point of reference to assess the impact of actions to improve access to renal transplantation deployed in New-Caledonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51140,"journal":{"name":"Nephrologie & Therapeutique","volume":"18 6","pages":"Pages 491-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1769725522005545/pdfft?md5=c6426e974852ed515a8e7c2968a10bde&pid=1-s2.0-S1769725522005545-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrologie & Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1769725522005545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Since 2012, a deceased donor kidney transplant program exists for dialysis patients living in New-Caledonia in collaboration with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia. This program has reduced the time spent out-of-territory for a renal transplantation and has reduced the economic burden of end stage renal disease in New-Caledonia. We have realised a photography of kidney transplants evaluation for patients in peritoneal dialysis in New-Caledonia and Wallis and Futuna. The first aim was to describe access to kidney transplants evaluation for dialysis patients. A second aim was to compare patients with a conformed kidney transplant evaluation and patients without transplant evaluation with no obvious reasons identified.

Method

All patients in peritoneal dialysis in New-Caledonia and Wallis and Futuna at the 2018, 31st july were included. A standardised form was filled by two nephrologists. The computerised shared medical record was used to collect information. A kidney transplant evaluation was adequate for patients registered on transplant waiting list, patients with medical contraindications identified or patients with evaluation exams begun less than 6 months.

Results

In total, 61 patients were included. The average age was 62 years old. The chronic kidney disease care average time was 6.7 years and the dialysis average time was 2.0 years. Among them, 11 (18 %) were registered on the waiting list, 26 (43 %) had at least one kidney transplant medical contraindication, 3 (5 %) had begun transplant exam since less than 6 months and 21 (34 %) had no transplant exam begun or transplant exam begun since more than 6 months without medical contraindication identified. Among those 21 patients, the three most common reasons were a faulty programming transplant exam (67 %; n = 14), a remote living place (48 %; n = 10) and an intercurrent health event (29 %; n = 6). Among patients living in Noumea and suburbs, 74 % had a conformed transplant evaluation against 44 % in patients living outside Noumea and suburbs (P = 0.058). Nearly one in two patients not on the waiting list had have no information about kidney graft or the information was not recorded in the medical record.

Conclusion

This study showed two main factors of a non-conformed transplantation evaluation: living outside Noumea and suburbs and a non-efficient planning of pre-transplant assessment exams. There is also a lack of information to the patient. These risk factors for late registration and non-registration must be considered by the healthcare teams. This study will provide a point of reference to assess the impact of actions to improve access to renal transplantation deployed in New-Caledonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新喀里多尼亚、沃利斯和富图纳腹膜透析患者肾移植等待名单
自2012年以来,与澳大利亚悉尼皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院合作,为新喀里多尼亚的透析患者开展了一项已故供体肾脏移植计划。该方案减少了在境外进行肾移植所需的时间,减少了新喀里多尼亚终末期肾病的经济负担。我们已经在新喀里多尼亚、瓦利斯和富图纳实现了对腹膜透析患者肾脏移植评估的摄影。第一个目的是描述透析患者获得肾移植的评估。第二个目的是比较符合肾移植评估的患者和没有移植评估且没有明确原因的患者。方法纳入2018年7月31日新喀里多尼亚、瓦利斯和富图纳所有腹膜透析患者。一份标准化表格由两名肾病学家填写。计算机化的共享病历被用来收集信息。对于在移植等待名单上登记的患者、确定有医疗禁忌症的患者或开始评估检查不到6个月的患者,进行肾移植评估是足够的。结果共纳入61例患者。平均年龄为62岁。慢性肾病护理平均时间为6.7年,透析平均时间为2.0年。其中,11例(18%)登记在等候名单上,26例(43%)至少有一种肾移植医学禁忌症,3例(5%)开始移植检查少于6个月,21例(34%)未开始移植检查或6个月以上开始移植检查但未发现医学禁忌症。在这21例患者中,三个最常见的原因是错误的程序移植检查(67%;N = 14),偏远的居住地(48%;N = 10)和合并健康事件(29%;n = 6)。居住在努美阿和郊区的患者中,74%的患者移植评估符合,而居住在努美阿和郊区以外的患者移植评估符合的比例为44% (P = 0.058)。几乎每两个不在等待名单上的患者中就有一个没有关于肾移植的信息,或者没有记录在医疗记录中。结论本研究揭示了移植评估不符合的两个主要因素:居住在努美阿和郊区以外,以及移植前评估检查的低效规划。对病人来说也缺乏信息。医疗团队必须考虑延迟登记和未登记的这些风险因素。这项研究将提供一个参考点,以评估行动的影响,以改善获得肾移植部署在新喀里多尼亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nephrologie & Therapeutique
Nephrologie & Therapeutique 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
485
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Organe d''expression de la Société de Néphrologie, de la Société Francophone de Dialyse et de la Société de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Néphrologie et Thérapeutique a pour vocation de publier des textes en français dans le domaine de la Néphrologie, qu''il s''agisse d''actualisation des connaissances, de recommandations de bonne pratique clinique, de publications originales, ou d''informations sur la vie des trois sociétés fondatrices. La variété des thèmes abordés reflète la richesse de la Néphrologie, qu''il s''agisse d''aspects fondamentaux issus de la physiologie, de l''immunologie, de l''anatomo-pathologie, ou de la génétique, ou de sujets de néphrologie clinique, notamment ceux en rapport avec les thérapeutiques néphrologiques, transplantation, hémodialyse et dialyse péritonéale.
期刊最新文献
Posters Posters commentés Communications orales [Biological parameters for assessment and monitoring anemia in hemodialysis patients]. [Arguments for the use of cardiac biomarkers in hemodialysis: natriuretic peptides and troponins].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1