Resilience as a protective factor in face of pain symptomatology, disability and psychological outcomes in adult chronic pain populations: a scoping review.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2021-0190
Zanna Chng, Jerry Jay Yeo, Ashutosh Joshi
{"title":"Resilience as a protective factor in face of pain symptomatology, disability and psychological outcomes in adult chronic pain populations: a scoping review.","authors":"Zanna Chng,&nbsp;Jerry Jay Yeo,&nbsp;Ashutosh Joshi","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2021-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients suffering from chronic pain experience significant disability and disease burden. Resilience has been understood to be a protective factor in face of adversity, eventually contributing to positive outcomes. As such, the current review sought to summarize the existing literature focusing on the roles of resilience in relation to pain phenomenology, pain outcomes (including function and mental health), amongst relevant clinical correlates in a bid to promote holistic management of debilitating chronic pain conditions from a resilience-oriented psychotherapeutic approach as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted on empirical studies surrounding the theme of resilience in adult chronic pain populations published before 9th May 2021. The following main inclusion criteria was applied; (a) adults diagnosed with chronic pain disorders, (b) use of quantifiable pain measures, (c) use of quantifiable resilience measures. A total of 32 studies were then selected for the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, higher levels of resilience were associated with a reduced likelihood of experiencing any chronic pain, fewer pain sites, better psychological response towards nociception and reduced need for analgesia. Second, higher levels of resilience correlated with better daily and physical function, quality of life, psychosocial functioning and lower likelihood of co-morbid mental health disorders. Third, resilience was an intermediary variable in the pathways from pain phenomenology leading to pain interference, depression and post-traumatic growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings were contextualized using pain-disability and resilience frameworks (The Pain and Disability Drivers Model, O'Leary's Resilience models) with suggestions to enhance resilience and contextual factors in the holistic management of adult chronic pain conditions. Future research should examine the differences in resilience between pain types as well as evaluate the efficacy of streamlined resilience-oriented interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2021-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Patients suffering from chronic pain experience significant disability and disease burden. Resilience has been understood to be a protective factor in face of adversity, eventually contributing to positive outcomes. As such, the current review sought to summarize the existing literature focusing on the roles of resilience in relation to pain phenomenology, pain outcomes (including function and mental health), amongst relevant clinical correlates in a bid to promote holistic management of debilitating chronic pain conditions from a resilience-oriented psychotherapeutic approach as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted on empirical studies surrounding the theme of resilience in adult chronic pain populations published before 9th May 2021. The following main inclusion criteria was applied; (a) adults diagnosed with chronic pain disorders, (b) use of quantifiable pain measures, (c) use of quantifiable resilience measures. A total of 32 studies were then selected for the review.

Results: First, higher levels of resilience were associated with a reduced likelihood of experiencing any chronic pain, fewer pain sites, better psychological response towards nociception and reduced need for analgesia. Second, higher levels of resilience correlated with better daily and physical function, quality of life, psychosocial functioning and lower likelihood of co-morbid mental health disorders. Third, resilience was an intermediary variable in the pathways from pain phenomenology leading to pain interference, depression and post-traumatic growth.

Conclusions: The findings were contextualized using pain-disability and resilience frameworks (The Pain and Disability Drivers Model, O'Leary's Resilience models) with suggestions to enhance resilience and contextual factors in the holistic management of adult chronic pain conditions. Future research should examine the differences in resilience between pain types as well as evaluate the efficacy of streamlined resilience-oriented interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在成人慢性疼痛人群中,弹性作为一种面对疼痛症状、残疾和心理结果的保护因素:范围综述。
目的:慢性疼痛患者有显著的残疾和疾病负担。人们认为,面对逆境时,适应力是一种保护因素,最终会带来积极的结果。因此,本综述试图总结现有文献,重点关注弹性在疼痛现象学、疼痛结果(包括功能和心理健康)以及相关临床相关方面的作用,以期从以弹性为导向的心理治疗方法作为药物治疗的辅助手段,促进衰弱性慢性疼痛状况的整体管理。方法:对2021年5月9日之前发表的关于成人慢性疼痛人群恢复力主题的实证研究进行范围综述。采用以下主要入选标准:(a)诊断为慢性疼痛障碍的成年人,(b)使用可量化的疼痛测量,(c)使用可量化的恢复力测量。总共有32项研究被选中进行回顾。结果:首先,高水平的恢复力与经历任何慢性疼痛的可能性降低,疼痛部位减少,对伤害感觉的心理反应更好以及对镇痛的需求减少有关。其次,高水平的恢复力与更好的日常和身体功能、生活质量、社会心理功能以及更低的共病精神健康障碍的可能性相关。第三,心理弹性是疼痛现象学导致疼痛干扰、抑郁和创伤后成长的中介变量。结论:采用疼痛和残疾驱动模型(The Pain and Disability Drivers Model)、O’leary’s resilience模型(O’leary’s resilience模型)对研究结果进行了情境化处理,并提出了在成人慢性疼痛的整体管理中增强弹性和情境因素的建议。未来的研究应该检查不同疼痛类型之间的弹性差异,以及评估精简的弹性导向干预措施的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Neck and shoulder pain and inflammatory biomarkers in plasma among forklift truck operators - A case-control study. A positive scratch collapse test in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome indicates its neuropathic character. Real-world evidence evaluation on consumer experience and prescription journey of diclofenac gel in Sweden. Differences in risk factors for flare-ups in patients with lumbar radicular pain may depend on the definition of flare. The "future" pain clinician: Competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1