Indigenous food sovereignty assessment-A systematic literature review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12813
Malika Abdul, Ale Ingabire, Chin Yu Nicole Lam, Bindi Bennett, Kelly Menzel, Kristen MacKenzie-Shalders, Louise van Herwerden
{"title":"Indigenous food sovereignty assessment-A systematic literature review.","authors":"Malika Abdul, Ale Ingabire, Chin Yu Nicole Lam, Bindi Bennett, Kelly Menzel, Kristen MacKenzie-Shalders, Louise van Herwerden","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify assessment approaches of Indigenous food sovereignty using the core domains of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability, (2) describe Indigenous research methodologies when assessing Indigenous food sovereignty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by Indigenous members of the research team, a systematic review across four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) was performed. Studies in any language from 1996 to 2021, that used one or more of the core domains (identified from a recent scoping review) of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 20 062 records, after exclusion criteria were applied, 34 studies were included. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly qualitative (n = 17) or mixed methods (n = 16), with interviews the most utilised (n = 29), followed by focus groups and meetings (n = 23) and validated frameworks (n = 7) as assessment tools. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly around inclusion of traditional food knowledge (n = 21), or environmental/intervention sustainability (n = 15). Community-Based Participatory Research approaches were utilised across many studies (n = 26), with one-third utilising Indigenous methods of inquiry. Acknowledgement of data sovereignty (n = 6) or collaboration with Indigenous researchers (n = 4) was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches in the literature worldwide. It emphasises the importance of using Indigenous research methodologies in research conducted by or with Indigenous Peoples and acknowledges Indigenous communities should lead future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify assessment approaches of Indigenous food sovereignty using the core domains of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability, (2) describe Indigenous research methodologies when assessing Indigenous food sovereignty.

Methods: Guided by Indigenous members of the research team, a systematic review across four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) was performed. Studies in any language from 1996 to 2021, that used one or more of the core domains (identified from a recent scoping review) of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability were included.

Results: From 20 062 records, after exclusion criteria were applied, 34 studies were included. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly qualitative (n = 17) or mixed methods (n = 16), with interviews the most utilised (n = 29), followed by focus groups and meetings (n = 23) and validated frameworks (n = 7) as assessment tools. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly around inclusion of traditional food knowledge (n = 21), or environmental/intervention sustainability (n = 15). Community-Based Participatory Research approaches were utilised across many studies (n = 26), with one-third utilising Indigenous methods of inquiry. Acknowledgement of data sovereignty (n = 6) or collaboration with Indigenous researchers (n = 4) was limited.

Conclusion: This review highlights Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches in the literature worldwide. It emphasises the importance of using Indigenous research methodologies in research conducted by or with Indigenous Peoples and acknowledges Indigenous communities should lead future research in this area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土著粮食主权评估--系统文献综述。
目的:本系统性综述旨在:(1)利用社区所有权、传统食物知识的纳入、文化食物的纳入/推广以及环境/干预措施的可持续性等核心领域,确定土著食物主权的评估方法;(2)描述评估土著食物主权的土著研究方法:在研究小组土著成员的指导下,对四个数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO)进行了系统性审查。研究对象包括 1996 年至 2021 年使用任何语言进行的研究,这些研究使用了一个或多个核心领域(从最近的范围界定审查中确定),即社区所有权、传统食品知识的纳入、文化食品的纳入/推广以及环境/干预措施的可持续性:结果:从 20 062 条记录中,在采用排除标准后,纳入了 34 项研究。土著食物主权评估方法大多采用定性方法(n = 17)或混合方法(n = 16),其中采用最多的是访谈(n = 29),其次是焦点小组和会议(n = 23),以及作为评估工具的验证框架(n = 7)。土著粮食主权评估方法主要围绕纳入传统粮食知识(n = 21)或环境/干预的可持续性(n = 15)。许多研究都采用了基于社区的参与式研究方法(n = 26),其中三分之一采用了土著调查方法。对数据主权的承认(n = 6)或与土著研究人员的合作(n = 4)有限:本综述重点介绍了全球文献中的土著粮食主权评估方法。它强调了在由土著人开展或与土著人共同开展的研究中使用土著研究方法的重要性,并承认土著社区应领导这一领域的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
How do plant-based milks compare to cow's milk nutritionally? An audit of the plant-based milk products available in Australia. Food intake in an Australian Aboriginal rural community facing food and water security challenges: A cross-sectional survey. The test-retest reliability and validity of food photography and food diary analyses. What have equity and human rights got to do with dietetics? Foodservice strategies for reducing athlete illness at the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1