Hospital-Level Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction in Japan During Fiscal Years 2014-2015 Using the National Database.

Circulation Reports Pub Date : 2023-04-12 eCollection Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0113
Jun Komiyama, Takehiro Sugiyama, Masao Iwagami, Miho Ishimaru, Yu Sun, Hiroki Matsui, Keitaro Kume, Masaru Sanuki, Teruyuki Koyama, Genta Kato, Yukiko Mori, Hiroaki Ueshima, Nanako Tamiya
{"title":"Hospital-Level Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction in Japan During Fiscal Years 2014-2015 Using the National Database.","authors":"Jun Komiyama, Takehiro Sugiyama, Masao Iwagami, Miho Ishimaru, Yu Sun, Hiroki Matsui, Keitaro Kume, Masaru Sanuki, Teruyuki Koyama, Genta Kato, Yukiko Mori, Hiroaki Ueshima, Nanako Tamiya","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based medical service for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, its implementation is inadequate. We investigated the provision status and equality of CR by hospitals in Japan using a comprehensive nationwide claims database. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> We analyzed data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups in Japan for the period April 2014-March 2016. We identified patients aged ≥20 years with postintervention AMI. We calculated hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation. The equality of hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation was evaluated using the Gini coefficient. We included 35,298 patients from 813 hospitals for the analysis of inpatients and 33,328 patients from 799 hospitals for the analysis of outpatients. The median hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation were 73.3% and 1.8%, respectively. The distribution of inpatient CR participation was bimodal; the Gini coefficients of inpatient and outpatient CR participation were 0.37 and 0.73, respectively. Although there were statistically significant differences in the hospital-level proportion of CR participation for several hospital factors, CR certification status for reimbursement was the only visually evident factor affecting the distribution of CR participation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The distributions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation by hospitals were suboptimal. Further research is warranted to determine future strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 5","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/9d/circrep-5-177.PMC10166669.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based medical service for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, its implementation is inadequate. We investigated the provision status and equality of CR by hospitals in Japan using a comprehensive nationwide claims database. Methods and Results: We analyzed data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups in Japan for the period April 2014-March 2016. We identified patients aged ≥20 years with postintervention AMI. We calculated hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation. The equality of hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation was evaluated using the Gini coefficient. We included 35,298 patients from 813 hospitals for the analysis of inpatients and 33,328 patients from 799 hospitals for the analysis of outpatients. The median hospital-level proportions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation were 73.3% and 1.8%, respectively. The distribution of inpatient CR participation was bimodal; the Gini coefficients of inpatient and outpatient CR participation were 0.37 and 0.73, respectively. Although there were statistically significant differences in the hospital-level proportion of CR participation for several hospital factors, CR certification status for reimbursement was the only visually evident factor affecting the distribution of CR participation. Conclusions: The distributions of inpatient and outpatient CR participation by hospitals were suboptimal. Further research is warranted to determine future strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-2015财政年度日本心肌梗死后心脏康复的医院水平变化使用国家数据库。
背景:心脏康复(CR)是一项针对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的循证医疗服务;然而,它的执行是不够的。我们使用一个全面的全国索赔数据库调查了日本医院CR的提供状况和平等性。方法 和 结果:我们分析了2014年4月至2016年3月期间日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库的数据。我们确定了年龄≥20岁的介入治疗后AMI患者。我们计算了住院患者和门诊患者CR参与的医院级比例。使用基尼系数评估住院患者和门诊患者CR参与的医院级比例的平等性。我们纳入了813家医院的35298名患者进行住院分析,799家医院中的33328名患者进行门诊分析。住院患者和门诊患者CR参与的中位医院水平比例分别为73.3%和1.8%。住院患者CR参与度呈双峰分布;住院患者和门诊患者CR参与的基尼系数分别为0.37和0.73。尽管医院层面的CR参与比例在几个医院因素中存在统计学上的显著差异,但CR报销认证状态是影响CR参与分布的唯一明显因素。结论:医院参与住院和门诊CR的分布并不理想。需要进一步研究以确定未来的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Syndrome in Older Men ― Clinical Characteristics Differ by Sex and Age ― Chopstick Stab in the Right Ventricle Clinical Impact of Preoperative Symptoms of Aortic Stenosis on Prognosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Effect of a 3-Month Single-Drug Approach Using Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis Nationwide Survey on Transitional Care for Patients With Childhood-Onset Cardiomyopathy in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1