Direct Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridged Heart Transplantation: The Importance of Multi-Organ Failure.

Ji Hoon Lim, Soo Yong Lee, Min Ho Ju, Seok Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Choi, Min Ku Chon, Sang Hyun Lee, Ki Won Hwang, Jeong Su Kim, Yong Hyun Park, Junehong Kim, Kook Jin Chun, Mi Hee Lim, Chee-Hoon Lee, Hyung Gon Je
{"title":"Direct Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridged Heart Transplantation: The Importance of Multi-Organ Failure.","authors":"Ji Hoon Lim,&nbsp;Soo Yong Lee,&nbsp;Min Ho Ju,&nbsp;Seok Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Jin Hee Choi,&nbsp;Min Ku Chon,&nbsp;Sang Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Ki Won Hwang,&nbsp;Jeong Su Kim,&nbsp;Yong Hyun Park,&nbsp;Junehong Kim,&nbsp;Kook Jin Chun,&nbsp;Mi Hee Lim,&nbsp;Chee-Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Gon Je","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2023.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recently, approximately 40% of all heart transplantation (HTx) in South Korea are performed using the direct extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridging method. We conducted a study to examine the clinical outcome of direct ECMO-bridged HTx and to investigate the impact of multi-organ failure (MOF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2014 to September 2022, a total of 96 adult patients who underwent isolated HTx at a single tertiary hospital were included in the study. The patients were sub-grouped into ECMO (n=48) and non-ECMO group (n=48), and the ECMO group was subdivided into awake (n=22) and non-awake (n=26) groups based on mechanical ventilator (MV) dependency. Baseline characteristics, 30-day, and 1-year mortality were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the ECMO group (72.9% vs. 95.8%, p=0.002). There was a significant difference in the 30-day survival rate between the awake and non-awake ECMO groups (81.8% vs. 65.4%, p=0.032). In the univariate analysis of logistic regression for 1-year mortality, the odds ratio was 8.5 for ECMO bridged HTx compared to the non-ECMO group, 12.3 in patients who required MV (p=0.003), and 23 with additional hemodialysis (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who required MV in ECMO bridged HTx showed higher preoperative MOF rates and early mortality than those extubated. When considering ECMO bridged HTx, the severity of MOF should be thoroughly investigated, and careful patient selection is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14058,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"5 2","pages":"91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/de/ijhf-5-91.PMC10172075.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recently, approximately 40% of all heart transplantation (HTx) in South Korea are performed using the direct extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridging method. We conducted a study to examine the clinical outcome of direct ECMO-bridged HTx and to investigate the impact of multi-organ failure (MOF).

Methods: From June 2014 to September 2022, a total of 96 adult patients who underwent isolated HTx at a single tertiary hospital were included in the study. The patients were sub-grouped into ECMO (n=48) and non-ECMO group (n=48), and the ECMO group was subdivided into awake (n=22) and non-awake (n=26) groups based on mechanical ventilator (MV) dependency. Baseline characteristics, 30-day, and 1-year mortality were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: The 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the ECMO group (72.9% vs. 95.8%, p=0.002). There was a significant difference in the 30-day survival rate between the awake and non-awake ECMO groups (81.8% vs. 65.4%, p=0.032). In the univariate analysis of logistic regression for 1-year mortality, the odds ratio was 8.5 for ECMO bridged HTx compared to the non-ECMO group, 12.3 in patients who required MV (p=0.003), and 23 with additional hemodialysis (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Patients who required MV in ECMO bridged HTx showed higher preoperative MOF rates and early mortality than those extubated. When considering ECMO bridged HTx, the severity of MOF should be thoroughly investigated, and careful patient selection is necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接体外膜氧合桥接心脏移植:多器官衰竭的重要性。
背景和目的:最近,韩国大约40%的心脏移植(HTx)使用直接体外膜氧合(ECMO)桥接方法进行。我们进行了一项研究,以检查直接ecmo桥接HTx的临床结果,并调查多器官功能衰竭(MOF)的影响。方法:选取2014年6月至2022年9月在某三级医院接受HTx隔离治疗的96例成人患者作为研究对象。将患者分为ECMO组(n=48)和非ECMO组(n=48), ECMO组根据机械呼吸机(MV)依赖程度又分为清醒组(n=22)和非清醒组(n=26)。回顾性分析基线特征、30天死亡率和1年死亡率。结果:ECMO组1年生存率明显低于ECMO组(72.9% vs. 95.8%, p=0.002)。清醒与非清醒ECMO组30天生存率差异有统计学意义(81.8% vs. 65.4%, p=0.032)。在1年死亡率的单因素logistic回归分析中,ECMO桥接HTx组与非ECMO组的比值比为8.5,需要MV组的比值比为12.3 (p=0.003),需要额外血液透析的患者的比值比为23 (p结论:ECMO桥接HTx组中需要MV的患者术前MOF率和早期死亡率高于拔管组。当考虑ECMO桥接HTx时,应彻底调查MOF的严重程度,并仔细选择患者是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Epidemiologic Profile and Predictors of Readmission of Heart Failure: Unveiling Opportunities for Improved Care. In-hospital Outcomes of Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations With Acute Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Management of the Underlying Etiologies and Comorbidities of Heart Failure. Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Advanced and Acute Heart Failure. Association of Blood Pressure and Prognosis of Heart Failure With Systolic Dysfunction: A Myth That Should Be Solved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1