Sex differences in perceptions of sleep inertia following nighttime awakenings.

Cassie J Hilditch, Sean Pradhan, Gregory Costedoat, Nicholas G Bathurst, Zachary Glaros, Kevin B Gregory, Nita L Shattuck, Erin E Flynn-Evans
{"title":"Sex differences in perceptions of sleep inertia following nighttime awakenings.","authors":"Cassie J Hilditch,&nbsp;Sean Pradhan,&nbsp;Gregory Costedoat,&nbsp;Nicholas G Bathurst,&nbsp;Zachary Glaros,&nbsp;Kevin B Gregory,&nbsp;Nita L Shattuck,&nbsp;Erin E Flynn-Evans","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The influence of biological sex on sleep inertia symptoms is currently unknown. We investigated the role of sex differences in the subjective experience and objective cognitive manifestation of sleep inertia following nighttime awakenings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two healthy adults (16 female, 25.91 ± 5.63 years) completed a 1-week at-home study with one experimental night during which sleep was measured by polysomnography and participants were awakened during their habitual sleep time. Participants completed a psychomotor vigilance task, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), visual analog mood scales, and a descending subtraction task (DST) prior to sleep (baseline) and at 2, 12, 22, and 32 min after awakening. A series of mixed-effects models with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests were used to examine the main effects of test bout and sex, and their interaction, with a random effect of participant, and order of wake-up and sleep history as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All outcomes except for percent correct on the DST showed a significant main effect of test bout, with worse performance after waking compared to baseline (all <i>p</i>s < .003). Significant effects of sex (<i>p</i> = .002) and sex × test bout (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>M</sub> = 0.49, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>C</sub> = 0.69) were observed for KSS, with females reporting a greater increase in sleepiness from baseline to after waking compared to males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that while females reported feeling sleepier than males following nighttime awakenings, their cognitive performance was comparable. Future research is needed to determine whether perceptions of sleepiness influence decision-making during the transition from sleep to wakefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"zpac043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108636/pdf/zpac043.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Study objectives: The influence of biological sex on sleep inertia symptoms is currently unknown. We investigated the role of sex differences in the subjective experience and objective cognitive manifestation of sleep inertia following nighttime awakenings.

Methods: Thirty-two healthy adults (16 female, 25.91 ± 5.63 years) completed a 1-week at-home study with one experimental night during which sleep was measured by polysomnography and participants were awakened during their habitual sleep time. Participants completed a psychomotor vigilance task, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), visual analog mood scales, and a descending subtraction task (DST) prior to sleep (baseline) and at 2, 12, 22, and 32 min after awakening. A series of mixed-effects models with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests were used to examine the main effects of test bout and sex, and their interaction, with a random effect of participant, and order of wake-up and sleep history as covariates.

Results: All outcomes except for percent correct on the DST showed a significant main effect of test bout, with worse performance after waking compared to baseline (all ps < .003). Significant effects of sex (p = .002) and sex × test bout (p = .01; R2M = 0.49, R2C = 0.69) were observed for KSS, with females reporting a greater increase in sleepiness from baseline to after waking compared to males.

Conclusions: These results suggest that while females reported feeling sleepier than males following nighttime awakenings, their cognitive performance was comparable. Future research is needed to determine whether perceptions of sleepiness influence decision-making during the transition from sleep to wakefulness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夜间醒来后睡眠惯性感知的性别差异。
研究目的:生理性别对睡眠惯性症状的影响目前尚不清楚。我们调查了性别差异在夜间醒来后睡眠惯性的主观体验和客观认知表现中的作用。方法:32名健康成年人(16名女性,25.91岁) ± 5.63岁)完成了一项为期1周的家庭研究,其中一个实验晚上通过多导睡眠图测量睡眠,参与者在习惯性睡眠时间被唤醒。参与者在睡眠前(基线)和醒来后2、12、22和32分钟完成了心理运动警戒任务、卡罗林斯卡失眠量表(KSS)、视觉模拟情绪量表和递减减法任务(DST)。使用一系列带有Bonferroni校正的事后检验的混合效应模型来检验测试回合和性别的主要影响及其相互作用,参与者的随机效应以及唤醒顺序和睡眠史作为协变量。结果:除了DST的正确率外,所有结果都显示出测试回合的显著主要影响,与基线相比,醒来后的表现更差(所有p p = .002)和性别 × 测试回合(p = .01;200万兰特 = 0.49,R2C = 0.69),女性报告称,与男性相比,从基线到醒来后的嗜睡增加更大。结论:这些结果表明,虽然女性在夜间醒来后感觉比男性更困,但她们的认知表现是相当的。未来的研究需要确定在从睡眠到清醒的过渡过程中,对嗜睡的感知是否会影响决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A life of research on everyday sleep(iness). How openness and inquisitiveness led to a career as a sleep researcher and a broad contribution to sleep science. The lasting legacy of Charles Fisher (1908-1988), pioneering sleep laboratory scientist and sleep medicine psychiatrist. How did I come to sleep research and stay there? Looking beyond sleep duration in understanding obesity risk in adolescents: the role of circadian timing and misalignment on adolescent dietary outcomes, physical activity, and body mass index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1