Rebecca L Pearl, Thomas A Wadden, Caroline Bach, Erica M LaFata, Shiva Gautam, Sharon Leonard, Robert I Berkowitz, Janet D Latner, John M Jakicic
{"title":"Long-term effects of an internalized weight stigma intervention: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Rebecca L Pearl, Thomas A Wadden, Caroline Bach, Erica M LaFata, Shiva Gautam, Sharon Leonard, Robert I Berkowitz, Janet D Latner, John M Jakicic","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the long-term effects of a group-based, psychological intervention designed to reduce internalized weight stigma (IWS, i.e., self-stigma), delivered in combination with behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatment, compared to BWL alone.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with obesity who had experienced and IWS (<i>N</i> = 105, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 49 years, 90.5% women, 70.5% White, 24.8% Black, <i>M</i><sub>BMI</sub> = 38 kg/m²) were randomized to receive BWL with the Weight Bias Internalization and Stigma (BIAS) Program or BWL alone. Participants received weekly group treatment for 20 weeks, followed by 52 weeks of monthly and every-other-month sessions. Percent weight change at Week 72 was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of weight change at other time points; physical activity (measured by accelerometry, interview, and self-report); cardiometabolic risk factors; and psychological and behavioral outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses used linear mixed models to test for between-group differences. Treatment acceptability was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group lost 2 percentage points more of baseline weight at Week 72, which was not a significant difference (mean weight change = -7.2% vs. -5.2%, 95% CI [-4.6 to 0.6], <i>p</i> = 0.14, <i>d</i> = 0.18). The BWL + BIAS (vs. BWL) group produced significantly greater improvements in weight self-stigma, eating self-efficacy, and some aspects of quality of life at specific time points. Most outcomes improved significantly over time but did not differ between groups. The trial had high retention and treatment acceptability, with higher ratings in the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in weight loss were observed between the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group. Possible benefits of addressing weight stigma in weight management warrant further investigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"91 7","pages":"398-410"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To test the long-term effects of a group-based, psychological intervention designed to reduce internalized weight stigma (IWS, i.e., self-stigma), delivered in combination with behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatment, compared to BWL alone.
Method: Adults with obesity who had experienced and IWS (N = 105, Mage = 49 years, 90.5% women, 70.5% White, 24.8% Black, MBMI = 38 kg/m²) were randomized to receive BWL with the Weight Bias Internalization and Stigma (BIAS) Program or BWL alone. Participants received weekly group treatment for 20 weeks, followed by 52 weeks of monthly and every-other-month sessions. Percent weight change at Week 72 was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of weight change at other time points; physical activity (measured by accelerometry, interview, and self-report); cardiometabolic risk factors; and psychological and behavioral outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses used linear mixed models to test for between-group differences. Treatment acceptability was assessed.
Results: Participants in the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group lost 2 percentage points more of baseline weight at Week 72, which was not a significant difference (mean weight change = -7.2% vs. -5.2%, 95% CI [-4.6 to 0.6], p = 0.14, d = 0.18). The BWL + BIAS (vs. BWL) group produced significantly greater improvements in weight self-stigma, eating self-efficacy, and some aspects of quality of life at specific time points. Most outcomes improved significantly over time but did not differ between groups. The trial had high retention and treatment acceptability, with higher ratings in the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group.
Conclusions: No significant differences in weight loss were observed between the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group. Possible benefits of addressing weight stigma in weight management warrant further investigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
