Comparative analysis of different nuclear medicine techniques in evaluation of renal function.

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5603/NMR.2023.0011
Aleksandra Peshevska, Tanja Makazlieva, Venjamin Majstorov, Lambe Barandovski, Irena Rambabova-Bushljetik, Daniela Miladinova
{"title":"Comparative analysis of different nuclear medicine techniques in evaluation of renal function.","authors":"Aleksandra Peshevska,&nbsp;Tanja Makazlieva,&nbsp;Venjamin Majstorov,&nbsp;Lambe Barandovski,&nbsp;Irena Rambabova-Bushljetik,&nbsp;Daniela Miladinova","doi":"10.5603/NMR.2023.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nuclear medicine (NM) methods play an important role in the evaluation of renal function in a wide range of clinical indications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between measured GFR (mGFR) obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method (TPSM) - reference method vs. estimated GFR (eGFR) using Fleming's single plasma sample method (SPSM) at 120 min, 180 min, and 240 min and correlation of reference method with eGFR with camera-based Gates' protocol.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 82 subjects (33 male/49 female) with a mean age of 54.87 ± 15.65 years were included and mGFR value was obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method and eGFR was obtained with Fleming's single sample method. eGFR was also quantified with the camera-based Gates' protocol after i.v. application of [99mTc]Tc-DTPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed a very strong positive significant correlation between all three SPSMs with the TPSM as the reference method. Between the Gates' method and the TPSM in the group of patients with mGFR ≥ 61-84 mL/min/1.73 m2 and mGFR ≥ 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, a moderate positive statistically significant correlation was obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SPSM method shows a very strong correlation with the reference and low bias in all three groups of patients and can be routinely used for GFR estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NMR.2023.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nuclear medicine (NM) methods play an important role in the evaluation of renal function in a wide range of clinical indications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between measured GFR (mGFR) obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method (TPSM) - reference method vs. estimated GFR (eGFR) using Fleming's single plasma sample method (SPSM) at 120 min, 180 min, and 240 min and correlation of reference method with eGFR with camera-based Gates' protocol.

Material and methods: A total of 82 subjects (33 male/49 female) with a mean age of 54.87 ± 15.65 years were included and mGFR value was obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method and eGFR was obtained with Fleming's single sample method. eGFR was also quantified with the camera-based Gates' protocol after i.v. application of [99mTc]Tc-DTPA.

Results: Our study revealed a very strong positive significant correlation between all three SPSMs with the TPSM as the reference method. Between the Gates' method and the TPSM in the group of patients with mGFR ≥ 61-84 mL/min/1.73 m2 and mGFR ≥ 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, a moderate positive statistically significant correlation was obtained.

Conclusions: The SPSM method shows a very strong correlation with the reference and low bias in all three groups of patients and can be routinely used for GFR estimation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同核医学技术评价肾功能的比较分析。
核医学(NM)方法在广泛的临床适应症中对肾功能的评价起着重要的作用。本研究的目的是评估三等离子体样品斜率截距纳米法(TPSM) -参考方法获得的GFR (mGFR)与使用Fleming单等离子体样品法(SPSM)在120分钟、180分钟和240分钟时估计的GFR (eGFR)之间的相关性,以及参考方法与基于相机的Gates协议的eGFR之间的相关性。材料与方法:共纳入82例受试者(男33例,女49例),平均年龄54.87±15.65岁,mGFR采用三血浆样品斜截NM法测定,eGFR采用Fleming单样本法测定。静脉注射[99mTc]Tc-DTPA后,采用基于相机的Gates方案定量eGFR。结果:以TPSM为参考方法,三种spsm之间存在非常强的正相关。mGFR≥61 ~ 84 mL/min/1.73 m2组和mGFR≥84 mL/min/1.73 m2组,Gates法与TPSM呈正相关,有中度统计学意义。结论:SPSM方法在三组患者中均与参考相关性强,偏差低,可常规用于GFR估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
期刊最新文献
Dosimetry during iodine-131 therapy - a technical point of view from a single centre's own experience. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values. A case of Muir-Torre syndrome on [18F]FDG PET/CT. Diffuse lymphoma involvement of the spinal cord showed on [18F]FDG PET/MRI. Quantitative analysis of standardized uptake values (SUV) of metastatic bone lesions in scintigraphy with [99mTc]Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-Tyr3-octreotide in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1