Seon Kim, Junpyo Kim, Kyeongmo Kim, Thomas Buckley
{"title":"老年友好环境与居家养老:潜在特征分析的发现","authors":"Seon Kim, Junpyo Kim, Kyeongmo Kim, Thomas Buckley","doi":"10.1177/00914150231194236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults prefer ageing in place (AIP) rather than institutionalized facilities. Although its advantages, AIP can be challenging when communities are unable to meet residents' needs. This study aims to identify the relationship between the level of age-friendliness of community and AIP. We used AARP Age-friendly Community Survey data with 6670 older adults in the USA. We used responses from 63 items assessing various aspects of a community's age-friendliness to identify different types of age-friendly communities (AFCs) through latent profile analysis (LPA). We then ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with AIP. LPA revealed three types of AFC: Underdeveloped, developing, and developed. Regression results showed older adults living in underdeveloped and developing communities are less likely to AIP compared to those in the developed community. These results show a positive impact of AFC on intention to AIP. Policymakers should consider expanding AFC initiatives for the growing number of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"499-514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-friendly Environment and Aging in Place: Finding from Latent Profile Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seon Kim, Junpyo Kim, Kyeongmo Kim, Thomas Buckley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00914150231194236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults prefer ageing in place (AIP) rather than institutionalized facilities. Although its advantages, AIP can be challenging when communities are unable to meet residents' needs. This study aims to identify the relationship between the level of age-friendliness of community and AIP. We used AARP Age-friendly Community Survey data with 6670 older adults in the USA. We used responses from 63 items assessing various aspects of a community's age-friendliness to identify different types of age-friendly communities (AFCs) through latent profile analysis (LPA). We then ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with AIP. LPA revealed three types of AFC: Underdeveloped, developing, and developed. Regression results showed older adults living in underdeveloped and developing communities are less likely to AIP compared to those in the developed community. These results show a positive impact of AFC on intention to AIP. Policymakers should consider expanding AFC initiatives for the growing number of older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Aging & Human Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"499-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Aging & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150231194236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aging & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150231194236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
老年人更喜欢就地养老(AIP),而不是机构养老。尽管居家养老有其优势,但当社区无法满足居民需求时,居家养老也会面临挑战。本研究旨在确定社区的老年友好程度与 AIP 之间的关系。我们使用了美国退休人员协会老年友好社区调查(AARP Age-friendly Community Survey)的数据,调查对象为美国的 6670 名老年人。我们利用 63 个评估社区老年友好度各方面的项目的回答,通过潜在特征分析(LPA)确定了不同类型的老年友好社区(AFCs)。然后,我们进行了多项式逻辑回归,以检验 AFC 类型是否与 AIP 相关。LPA 揭示了三种类型的老年友好社区:欠发达型、发展中型和发达型。回归结果显示,与发达社区的老年人相比,生活在欠发达社区和发展中社区的老年人发生 AIP 的可能性较低。这些结果显示了 AFC 对 AIP 意向的积极影响。政策制定者应考虑为日益增多的老年人扩大 AFC 计划。
Age-friendly Environment and Aging in Place: Finding from Latent Profile Analysis.
Older adults prefer ageing in place (AIP) rather than institutionalized facilities. Although its advantages, AIP can be challenging when communities are unable to meet residents' needs. This study aims to identify the relationship between the level of age-friendliness of community and AIP. We used AARP Age-friendly Community Survey data with 6670 older adults in the USA. We used responses from 63 items assessing various aspects of a community's age-friendliness to identify different types of age-friendly communities (AFCs) through latent profile analysis (LPA). We then ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with AIP. LPA revealed three types of AFC: Underdeveloped, developing, and developed. Regression results showed older adults living in underdeveloped and developing communities are less likely to AIP compared to those in the developed community. These results show a positive impact of AFC on intention to AIP. Policymakers should consider expanding AFC initiatives for the growing number of older adults.
期刊介绍:
These are some of the broad questions with which the International Journal of Aging and Human Development is concerned. Emphasis is upon psychological and social studies of aging and the aged. However, the Journal also publishes research that introduces observations from other fields that illuminate the "human" side of gerontology, or utilizes gerontological observations to illuminate in other fields.