医院质量绩效基准的学习卫生系统方法:综合医院质量指数。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Medical Quality Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000069
Benjamin D Pollock, Pablo Moreno Franco, Katherine H Noe, John D Poe, Andrew H Limper, Gianrico Farrugia, Henry H Ting, Sean C Dowdy
{"title":"医院质量绩效基准的学习卫生系统方法:综合医院质量指数。","authors":"Benjamin D Pollock,&nbsp;Pablo Moreno Franco,&nbsp;Katherine H Noe,&nbsp;John D Poe,&nbsp;Andrew H Limper,&nbsp;Gianrico Farrugia,&nbsp;Henry H Ting,&nbsp;Sean C Dowdy","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>US hospital quality rankings and ratings use disparate methodologies and are weakly correlated. This causes confusion for patients and hospital quality staff. At the authors' institution, a Composite Hospital Quality Index (CHQI) was developed to combine hospital quality ratings. This approach is described and a calculator is shared here for other health systems to explore their performance. Among the US News and World Report Top 50 Hospitals, hospital-specific numeric summary scores were aggregated from the 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Overall Star Rating, the Spring 2021 Leapfrog Safety Grade, and the April 2021 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Star Rating. The CHQI is the hospital-specific sum of the national percentile-rankings across these 3 ratings. In this example, mean (SD) percentiles were as follows: CMS Stars 74 (19), Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 63 (19), Leapfrog 65 (24), with mean (SD) CHQI of 202 (49). The CHQI is used at the authors' institution to identify improvement opportunities and ensure that high-quality care is delivered across the health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"37 5","pages":"444-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Learning Health System Approach to Hospital Quality Performance Benchmarking: The Composite Hospital Quality Index.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin D Pollock,&nbsp;Pablo Moreno Franco,&nbsp;Katherine H Noe,&nbsp;John D Poe,&nbsp;Andrew H Limper,&nbsp;Gianrico Farrugia,&nbsp;Henry H Ting,&nbsp;Sean C Dowdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>US hospital quality rankings and ratings use disparate methodologies and are weakly correlated. This causes confusion for patients and hospital quality staff. At the authors' institution, a Composite Hospital Quality Index (CHQI) was developed to combine hospital quality ratings. This approach is described and a calculator is shared here for other health systems to explore their performance. Among the US News and World Report Top 50 Hospitals, hospital-specific numeric summary scores were aggregated from the 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Overall Star Rating, the Spring 2021 Leapfrog Safety Grade, and the April 2021 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Star Rating. The CHQI is the hospital-specific sum of the national percentile-rankings across these 3 ratings. In this example, mean (SD) percentiles were as follows: CMS Stars 74 (19), Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 63 (19), Leapfrog 65 (24), with mean (SD) CHQI of 202 (49). The CHQI is used at the authors' institution to identify improvement opportunities and ensure that high-quality care is delivered across the health system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"444-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国医院质量排名和评级使用不同的方法,相关性很弱。这给病人和医院质量人员造成了困惑。在作者所在的机构,开发了一种综合医院质量指数(CHQI)来综合医院质量评级。本文描述了这种方法,并提供了一个计算器,供其他卫生系统探索其绩效。在《美国新闻与世界报道》排名前50位的医院中,医院特定的数字摘要得分是根据2021年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医院总体星级评定、2021年春季跨越式安全等级和2021年4月医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统星级评定汇总的。CHQI是医院在这三个等级中全国百分位数排名的总和。在这个例子中,平均(SD)百分位数如下:CMS Stars 74(19),医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估63 (19),Leapfrog 65(24),平均(SD) CHQI为202(49)。作者所在机构使用CHQI来确定改进机会,并确保在整个卫生系统中提供高质量的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Learning Health System Approach to Hospital Quality Performance Benchmarking: The Composite Hospital Quality Index.

US hospital quality rankings and ratings use disparate methodologies and are weakly correlated. This causes confusion for patients and hospital quality staff. At the authors' institution, a Composite Hospital Quality Index (CHQI) was developed to combine hospital quality ratings. This approach is described and a calculator is shared here for other health systems to explore their performance. Among the US News and World Report Top 50 Hospitals, hospital-specific numeric summary scores were aggregated from the 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Overall Star Rating, the Spring 2021 Leapfrog Safety Grade, and the April 2021 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Star Rating. The CHQI is the hospital-specific sum of the national percentile-rankings across these 3 ratings. In this example, mean (SD) percentiles were as follows: CMS Stars 74 (19), Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems 63 (19), Leapfrog 65 (24), with mean (SD) CHQI of 202 (49). The CHQI is used at the authors' institution to identify improvement opportunities and ensure that high-quality care is delivered across the health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
期刊最新文献
Standardized Management of Sickle Cell Disease Patients and the Effects on Care Utilization and Costs Primary Care Provider and Staff Wellness and Burnout Levels and Suggestions to Improve Wellness: Analysis of Survey Findings Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel Handoff Education Interventions: A Scoping Review Focused on Sustaining Improvements A Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) Clinic in Rural New England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1