肯尼亚和乌干达番茄生产中绝对图塔的经济、健康和环境负担。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Economic Entomology Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1093/jee/toad163
Fridah Chepchirchir, Beatrice Wambui Muriithi, Jackson Langat, Shepard Ndlela, Samira Abuelgasim Mohamed, Fathiya Khamis
{"title":"肯尼亚和乌干达番茄生产中绝对图塔的经济、健康和环境负担。","authors":"Fridah Chepchirchir,&nbsp;Beatrice Wambui Muriithi,&nbsp;Jackson Langat,&nbsp;Shepard Ndlela,&nbsp;Samira Abuelgasim Mohamed,&nbsp;Fathiya Khamis","doi":"10.1093/jee/toad163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The negative effects of pest infestation on agricultural production cannot be underestimated. There have been several efforts to control these pests, chiefly through the use of synthetic pesticides. However, the continuous use of the chemicals causes pest resistance and resurgence and presents high human and environmental risks. This study examines the economic, health, and environmental impacts of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917), an economically important pest in tomato production, among smallholder farmers in selected counties in Kenya and Uganda. Economic Impact Quotient and gross margin analysis were used on data obtained from a random sample of 316 and 345 tomato growers in Kenya and Uganda, respectively. The results show a significant impact of T. absoluta on tomato production in both countries. On average, the tomato growers earned a gross income of $38,123 and $11,627 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively, with synthetic chemicals for the management of T. absoluta contributing 66-78% of the cost of production. The opportunity cost lost due to forgoing pesticide for management of the pest, and instead replacing it with an integrated pest management package was valued between $8 and $646 in Kenya and $895 in Uganda, respectively, using net present value through the most pessimistic scenario, while benefit-cost ratio was $1 and $5 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"1529-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic, health, and environmental burden of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in tomato production in Kenya and Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Fridah Chepchirchir,&nbsp;Beatrice Wambui Muriithi,&nbsp;Jackson Langat,&nbsp;Shepard Ndlela,&nbsp;Samira Abuelgasim Mohamed,&nbsp;Fathiya Khamis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jee/toad163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The negative effects of pest infestation on agricultural production cannot be underestimated. There have been several efforts to control these pests, chiefly through the use of synthetic pesticides. However, the continuous use of the chemicals causes pest resistance and resurgence and presents high human and environmental risks. This study examines the economic, health, and environmental impacts of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917), an economically important pest in tomato production, among smallholder farmers in selected counties in Kenya and Uganda. Economic Impact Quotient and gross margin analysis were used on data obtained from a random sample of 316 and 345 tomato growers in Kenya and Uganda, respectively. The results show a significant impact of T. absoluta on tomato production in both countries. On average, the tomato growers earned a gross income of $38,123 and $11,627 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively, with synthetic chemicals for the management of T. absoluta contributing 66-78% of the cost of production. The opportunity cost lost due to forgoing pesticide for management of the pest, and instead replacing it with an integrated pest management package was valued between $8 and $646 in Kenya and $895 in Uganda, respectively, using net present value through the most pessimistic scenario, while benefit-cost ratio was $1 and $5 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1529-1539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虫害对农业生产的负面影响不容低估。为了控制这些害虫,已经做出了几项努力,主要是通过使用合成杀虫剂。然而,持续使用这些化学品会导致害虫的抗性和死灰复燃,并带来高的人类和环境风险。本研究调查了Tuta absoluta(Meyrick 1917)在肯尼亚和乌干达选定县的小农户中对经济、健康和环境的影响。经济影响商和毛利率分析分别用于从肯尼亚和乌干达的316和345名番茄种植者的随机样本中获得的数据。结果表明,绝对T.absoluta对两国番茄生产都有显著影响。肯尼亚和乌干达的番茄种植者平均总收入分别为38123美元和11627美元,用于管理绝对番茄的合成化学品占生产成本的66-78%。使用最悲观情景下的净现值,肯尼亚和乌干达因放弃杀虫剂来管理害虫而损失的机会成本分别在8美元至646美元和895美元之间,而肯尼亚和乌干达的收益成本比分别为1美元和5美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic, health, and environmental burden of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in tomato production in Kenya and Uganda.

The negative effects of pest infestation on agricultural production cannot be underestimated. There have been several efforts to control these pests, chiefly through the use of synthetic pesticides. However, the continuous use of the chemicals causes pest resistance and resurgence and presents high human and environmental risks. This study examines the economic, health, and environmental impacts of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917), an economically important pest in tomato production, among smallholder farmers in selected counties in Kenya and Uganda. Economic Impact Quotient and gross margin analysis were used on data obtained from a random sample of 316 and 345 tomato growers in Kenya and Uganda, respectively. The results show a significant impact of T. absoluta on tomato production in both countries. On average, the tomato growers earned a gross income of $38,123 and $11,627 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively, with synthetic chemicals for the management of T. absoluta contributing 66-78% of the cost of production. The opportunity cost lost due to forgoing pesticide for management of the pest, and instead replacing it with an integrated pest management package was valued between $8 and $646 in Kenya and $895 in Uganda, respectively, using net present value through the most pessimistic scenario, while benefit-cost ratio was $1 and $5 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
198
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Economic Entomology the most-cited entomological journal – publishes articles on the economic significance of insects and other arthropods and includes sections on apiculture & social insects, insecticides, biological control, household & structural insects, crop protection, forest entomology, and more. In addition to research papers, Journal of Economic Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, and Letters to the Editor. The journal is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Reviewers for Journal of Economic Entomology (November 2022–October 2023) 2-Methoxybenzaldehyde effectively repels ants Phenolic secondary metabolites from Acorus calamus (Acorales: Acoraceae) rhizomes: the feeding deterrents for Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Sampling Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) in 2 coffee bean warehouses in New Jersey. Biology and management of hemp russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1