肽是“更好的生物标志物”?价值、挑战和促进实现的潜在解决方案。

IF 6.9 2区 化学 Q1 SPECTROSCOPY Mass Spectrometry Reviews Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1002/mas.21854
Agnieszka Latosinska, Maria Frantzi, Justyna Siwy
{"title":"肽是“更好的生物标志物”?价值、挑战和促进实现的潜在解决方案。","authors":"Agnieszka Latosinska,&nbsp;Maria Frantzi,&nbsp;Justyna Siwy","doi":"10.1002/mas.21854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peptides carry important functions in normal physiological and pathophysiological processes and can serve as clinically useful biomarkers. Given the ability to diffuse passively across endothelial barriers, endogenous peptides can be examined in several body fluids, including among others urine, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. This review article provides an update on the recently published literature that reports on investigating native peptides in body fluids using mass spectrometry-based platforms, specifically those studies that focus on the application of peptides as biomarkers to improve clinical management. We emphasize on the critical evaluation of their clinical value, how close they are to implementation, and the associated challenges and potential solutions to facilitate clinical implementation. During the last 5 years, numerous studies have been published, demonstrating the increased interest in mass spectrometry for the assessment of endogenous peptides as potential biomarkers. Importantly, the presence of few successful examples of implementation in patients' management and/or in the context of clinical trials indicates that the peptide biomarker field is evolving. Nevertheless, most studies still report evidence based on small sample size, while validation phases are frequently missing. Therefore, a gap between discovery and implementation still exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":206,"journal":{"name":"Mass Spectrometry Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peptides as \\\"better biomarkers\\\"? Value, challenges, and potential solutions to facilitate implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Latosinska,&nbsp;Maria Frantzi,&nbsp;Justyna Siwy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mas.21854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peptides carry important functions in normal physiological and pathophysiological processes and can serve as clinically useful biomarkers. Given the ability to diffuse passively across endothelial barriers, endogenous peptides can be examined in several body fluids, including among others urine, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. This review article provides an update on the recently published literature that reports on investigating native peptides in body fluids using mass spectrometry-based platforms, specifically those studies that focus on the application of peptides as biomarkers to improve clinical management. We emphasize on the critical evaluation of their clinical value, how close they are to implementation, and the associated challenges and potential solutions to facilitate clinical implementation. During the last 5 years, numerous studies have been published, demonstrating the increased interest in mass spectrometry for the assessment of endogenous peptides as potential biomarkers. Importantly, the presence of few successful examples of implementation in patients' management and/or in the context of clinical trials indicates that the peptide biomarker field is evolving. Nevertheless, most studies still report evidence based on small sample size, while validation phases are frequently missing. Therefore, a gap between discovery and implementation still exists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mass Spectrometry Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mass Spectrometry Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mass Spectrometry Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多肽在正常生理和病理生理过程中具有重要的功能,可以作为临床有用的生物标志物。鉴于内源性多肽能够被动地扩散穿过内皮屏障,可以在多种体液中检测,包括尿液、血液和脑脊液。这篇综述文章提供了最近发表的关于使用基于质谱的平台研究体液中天然肽的文献的更新,特别是那些专注于将肽作为生物标志物应用于改善临床管理的研究。我们强调对其临床价值的批判性评估,它们离实施有多近,以及促进临床实施的相关挑战和潜在解决方案。在过去的5年中,发表了大量的研究,表明人们对质谱法评估内源性肽作为潜在生物标志物的兴趣越来越大。重要的是,在患者管理和/或临床试验的背景下,很少有成功实施的例子表明肽生物标志物领域正在发展。然而,大多数研究仍然报告基于小样本量的证据,而验证阶段经常缺失。因此,在发现和实施之间仍然存在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peptides as "better biomarkers"? Value, challenges, and potential solutions to facilitate implementation.

Peptides carry important functions in normal physiological and pathophysiological processes and can serve as clinically useful biomarkers. Given the ability to diffuse passively across endothelial barriers, endogenous peptides can be examined in several body fluids, including among others urine, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. This review article provides an update on the recently published literature that reports on investigating native peptides in body fluids using mass spectrometry-based platforms, specifically those studies that focus on the application of peptides as biomarkers to improve clinical management. We emphasize on the critical evaluation of their clinical value, how close they are to implementation, and the associated challenges and potential solutions to facilitate clinical implementation. During the last 5 years, numerous studies have been published, demonstrating the increased interest in mass spectrometry for the assessment of endogenous peptides as potential biomarkers. Importantly, the presence of few successful examples of implementation in patients' management and/or in the context of clinical trials indicates that the peptide biomarker field is evolving. Nevertheless, most studies still report evidence based on small sample size, while validation phases are frequently missing. Therefore, a gap between discovery and implementation still exists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
Mass Spectrometry Reviews 物理-光谱学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal Mass Spectrometry Reviews is to publish well-written reviews in selected topics in the various sub-fields of mass spectrometry as a means to summarize the research that has been performed in that area, to focus attention of other researchers, to critically review the published material, and to stimulate further research in that area. The scope of the published reviews include, but are not limited to topics, such as theoretical treatments, instrumental design, ionization methods, analyzers, detectors, application to the qualitative and quantitative analysis of various compounds or elements, basic ion chemistry and structure studies, ion energetic studies, and studies on biomolecules, polymers, etc.
期刊最新文献
Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Nucleic Acid Modifications: From Beginning to Future. Mass Spectrometry Structural Proteomics Enabled by Limited Proteolysis and Cross-Linking. Conjugation of primary amine groups in targeted proteomics. Origin and characterization of cyclodepsipeptides: Comprehensive structural approaches with focus on mass spectrometry analysis of alkali-cationized molecular species. Exploring the dynamic landscape of immunopeptidomics: Unravelling posttranslational modifications and navigating bioinformatics terrain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1