高压条件下EMMA二氧化碳计的技术验证。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.28920/dhm53.2.100-110
Alicia Tucker, David Smart
{"title":"高压条件下EMMA二氧化碳计的技术验证。","authors":"Alicia Tucker, David Smart","doi":"10.28920/dhm53.2.100-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring is essential for monitoring intubated critical care patients, yet its use in hyperbaric environments can be problematic. We postulated that the EMMA mainstream capnometer may function accurately under hyperbaric conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stage 1. The EMMA mainstream capnometer was tested at 101 kPa against a reference side-stream capnometer, Philips IntelliVue M3015B microstream, using 10 customised reference gases of various carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentrations (2.47%-8.09%, or 18.5-60.7 mmHg at 101 kPa) in either air or oxygen. Stage 2. The functionality and accuracy of the EMMA capnometer was tested under hyperbaric conditions, 121-281 kPa, using the same test gases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 101 kPa, the EMMA capnometer measured CO₂ at levels lower than expected (mean of differences = -2.5 mmHg (95% CI -2.1 to -2.9, P < 0.001)). The Philips capnometer measured CO₂ more closely to expected CO₂ (mean of differences = -1.1 mmHg (95% CI -0.69 to -1.4, P < 0.001). Both devices demonstrated a significant linear relationship with expected CO₂. The EMMA capnometer functioned up to the maximum test pressure (281 kPa). The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures > 141 kPa. Although variance increased at pressures in the therapeutic range for hyperbaric treatments, a significant linear relationship between expected and EMMA measured CO₂ was demonstrated. The EMMA capnometer tolerated pressures to 281 kPa, but its display was limited to CO₂ < 99 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated EMMA capnometer function to 281 kPa in the hyperbaric environment. The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures >141 kPa, however there was a linear relationship between expected and measured CO₂. The EMMA capnometer may be clinically useful for monitoring expired CO₂ in patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"53 2","pages":"100-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical validation of the EMMA capnometer under hyperbaric conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Tucker, David Smart\",\"doi\":\"10.28920/dhm53.2.100-110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring is essential for monitoring intubated critical care patients, yet its use in hyperbaric environments can be problematic. We postulated that the EMMA mainstream capnometer may function accurately under hyperbaric conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stage 1. The EMMA mainstream capnometer was tested at 101 kPa against a reference side-stream capnometer, Philips IntelliVue M3015B microstream, using 10 customised reference gases of various carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentrations (2.47%-8.09%, or 18.5-60.7 mmHg at 101 kPa) in either air or oxygen. Stage 2. The functionality and accuracy of the EMMA capnometer was tested under hyperbaric conditions, 121-281 kPa, using the same test gases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 101 kPa, the EMMA capnometer measured CO₂ at levels lower than expected (mean of differences = -2.5 mmHg (95% CI -2.1 to -2.9, P < 0.001)). The Philips capnometer measured CO₂ more closely to expected CO₂ (mean of differences = -1.1 mmHg (95% CI -0.69 to -1.4, P < 0.001). Both devices demonstrated a significant linear relationship with expected CO₂. The EMMA capnometer functioned up to the maximum test pressure (281 kPa). The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures > 141 kPa. Although variance increased at pressures in the therapeutic range for hyperbaric treatments, a significant linear relationship between expected and EMMA measured CO₂ was demonstrated. The EMMA capnometer tolerated pressures to 281 kPa, but its display was limited to CO₂ < 99 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated EMMA capnometer function to 281 kPa in the hyperbaric environment. The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures >141 kPa, however there was a linear relationship between expected and measured CO₂. The EMMA capnometer may be clinically useful for monitoring expired CO₂ in patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"100-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584396/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.2.100-110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.2.100-110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:潮气末二氧化碳(ETCO2)监测对于监测插管重症监护患者至关重要,但其在高压环境中的使用可能存在问题。我们假设EMMA主流二氧化碳计可以在高压条件下准确工作。方法:第1阶段。使用10种不同二氧化碳(CO₂) 空气或氧气中的浓度(2.47%-8.09%,或在101kPa时为18.5-60.7mmHg)。第二阶段。EMMA二氧化碳计的功能和准确性在121-281kPa的高压条件下使用相同的测试气体进行测试。结果:在101kPa下,EMMA二氧化碳计测得CO₂ 低于预期水平(差异平均值=-2.5 mmHg(95%CI-2.1至-2.9,P<0.001)₂ 更接近预期CO₂ (差异的平均值=-1.1 mmHg(95%CI-0.69至-1.4,P<0.001)。两种装置均与预期CO呈显著线性关系₂. EMMA二氧化碳计在最大试验压力(281 kPa)下工作。设备过度读取CO₂ 压力>141 kPa时的测量。尽管在高压治疗的治疗范围内,压力的变化增加,但预期和EMMA测量的CO之间存在显著的线性关系₂ 演示。EMMA二氧化碳计可承受281 kPa的压力,但其显示仅限于CO₂ < 99毫米汞柱。结论:本研究验证了EMMA二氧化碳计在高压环境中的281 kPa功能。设备过度读取CO₂ 压力>141kPa时的测量,但预期CO和测量CO之间存在线性关系₂. EMMA二氧化碳监测仪在临床上可用于监测过期CO₂ 在接受高压氧治疗的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technical validation of the EMMA capnometer under hyperbaric conditions.

Introduction: End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring is essential for monitoring intubated critical care patients, yet its use in hyperbaric environments can be problematic. We postulated that the EMMA mainstream capnometer may function accurately under hyperbaric conditions.

Methods: Stage 1. The EMMA mainstream capnometer was tested at 101 kPa against a reference side-stream capnometer, Philips IntelliVue M3015B microstream, using 10 customised reference gases of various carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentrations (2.47%-8.09%, or 18.5-60.7 mmHg at 101 kPa) in either air or oxygen. Stage 2. The functionality and accuracy of the EMMA capnometer was tested under hyperbaric conditions, 121-281 kPa, using the same test gases.

Results: At 101 kPa, the EMMA capnometer measured CO₂ at levels lower than expected (mean of differences = -2.5 mmHg (95% CI -2.1 to -2.9, P < 0.001)). The Philips capnometer measured CO₂ more closely to expected CO₂ (mean of differences = -1.1 mmHg (95% CI -0.69 to -1.4, P < 0.001). Both devices demonstrated a significant linear relationship with expected CO₂. The EMMA capnometer functioned up to the maximum test pressure (281 kPa). The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures > 141 kPa. Although variance increased at pressures in the therapeutic range for hyperbaric treatments, a significant linear relationship between expected and EMMA measured CO₂ was demonstrated. The EMMA capnometer tolerated pressures to 281 kPa, but its display was limited to CO₂ < 99 mmHg.

Conclusions: This study validated EMMA capnometer function to 281 kPa in the hyperbaric environment. The device over-read CO₂ measurements at pressures >141 kPa, however there was a linear relationship between expected and measured CO₂. The EMMA capnometer may be clinically useful for monitoring expired CO₂ in patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic emission, an innovative diagnosis tool for therapeutic hyperbaric chambers: or how to requalify safely using pneumatic pressure test. Arterial dissection in scuba divers: a potential adverse manifestation of the physiological effects of immersion. Bispectral index with density spectral array (BIS-DSA) monitoring in a patient with inner ear and cerebral decompression sickness. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Hyperbaric medicine and climate footprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1