RAM套管在儿童无创鼻通气中的门诊应用。

IF 1.7 Q2 PEDIATRICS Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795565231192965
Brittany A Truitt, Erin F Kallam, Eric W Price, Amit S Shah, Dawn M Simon, Ajay S Kasi
{"title":"RAM套管在儿童无创鼻通气中的门诊应用。","authors":"Brittany A Truitt,&nbsp;Erin F Kallam,&nbsp;Eric W Price,&nbsp;Amit S Shah,&nbsp;Dawn M Simon,&nbsp;Ajay S Kasi","doi":"10.1177/11795565231192965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The RAM cannula<sup>®</sup> consists of nasal prongs that can be used to administer oxygen, continuous, and bilevel positive airway pressure therapies. Studies have reported the efficacy and utility of the RAM cannula in inpatients requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV); however, there is limited literature on the use of the RAM cannula to provide NIV in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of children who used NIV via RAM cannula in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of children treated with outpatient NIV via RAM cannula at our institution between January 2010 and March 2023. The analyzed data included age, diagnoses, indications for NIV, duration of RAM cannula use, complications, and outcomes at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 20 patients who used outpatient NIV via RAM cannula during the study period. The median age at initiation of NIV via RAM cannula was 5.8 months (IQR 2.4-9.9 months). Indications for NIV included sleep-related hypoventilation (15%), restrictive lung disease (25%), obstructive sleep apnea (45%), and chronic respiratory failure (50%), with 6 patients having ⩾2 indications for NIV. RAM cannula was utilized for inability to tolerate conventional NIV interfaces (80%), to alleviate dyspnea (60%), and to avoid tracheostomy (55%). Patients used NIV via RAM cannula for a median duration of 7.7 months (IQR 3.7-20.6 months). Patient outcomes included ongoing usage of RAM cannula (55%), changing to conventional NIV interfaces (15%) or oxygen (10%), weaning off respiratory support (5%), and death (15%). There were no complications related to using the RAM cannula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the utility of outpatient NIV via RAM cannula in children with a variety of diagnoses until clinical improvement or tolerance of conventional interfaces, and for avoidance of tracheostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45027,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","volume":"17 ","pages":"11795565231192965"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/7d/10.1177_11795565231192965.PMC10439674.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient Utilization of the RAM Cannula for Nasal Noninvasive Ventilation in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany A Truitt,&nbsp;Erin F Kallam,&nbsp;Eric W Price,&nbsp;Amit S Shah,&nbsp;Dawn M Simon,&nbsp;Ajay S Kasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795565231192965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The RAM cannula<sup>®</sup> consists of nasal prongs that can be used to administer oxygen, continuous, and bilevel positive airway pressure therapies. Studies have reported the efficacy and utility of the RAM cannula in inpatients requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV); however, there is limited literature on the use of the RAM cannula to provide NIV in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of children who used NIV via RAM cannula in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of children treated with outpatient NIV via RAM cannula at our institution between January 2010 and March 2023. The analyzed data included age, diagnoses, indications for NIV, duration of RAM cannula use, complications, and outcomes at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 20 patients who used outpatient NIV via RAM cannula during the study period. The median age at initiation of NIV via RAM cannula was 5.8 months (IQR 2.4-9.9 months). Indications for NIV included sleep-related hypoventilation (15%), restrictive lung disease (25%), obstructive sleep apnea (45%), and chronic respiratory failure (50%), with 6 patients having ⩾2 indications for NIV. RAM cannula was utilized for inability to tolerate conventional NIV interfaces (80%), to alleviate dyspnea (60%), and to avoid tracheostomy (55%). Patients used NIV via RAM cannula for a median duration of 7.7 months (IQR 3.7-20.6 months). Patient outcomes included ongoing usage of RAM cannula (55%), changing to conventional NIV interfaces (15%) or oxygen (10%), weaning off respiratory support (5%), and death (15%). There were no complications related to using the RAM cannula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the utility of outpatient NIV via RAM cannula in children with a variety of diagnoses until clinical improvement or tolerance of conventional interfaces, and for avoidance of tracheostomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11795565231192965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/7d/10.1177_11795565231192965.PMC10439674.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795565231192965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795565231192965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:RAM插管®由鼻尖组成,可用于给氧、持续和双水平气道正压治疗。研究报告了RAM套管在需要无创通气(NIV)的住院患者中的疗效和实用性;然而,关于在门诊使用RAM套管提供无创通气的文献有限。目的:本研究旨在描述门诊通过RAM插管使用NIV的儿童的临床特征和结果。设计:回顾性审查。方法:我们对2010年1月至2023年3月在我院门诊通过RAM套管治疗NIV的儿童进行回顾性分析。分析的数据包括年龄、诊断、NIV指征、RAM插管使用时间、并发症和6个月时的结果。结果:我们确定了20例在研究期间通过RAM插管使用门诊NIV的患者。通过RAM插管开始NIV的中位年龄为5.8个月(IQR 2.4-9.9个月)。NIV的适应症包括睡眠相关通气不足(15%)、限制性肺部疾病(25%)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(45%)和慢性呼吸衰竭(50%),有6名患者的NIV适应症大于或等于2。RAM插管用于无法耐受传统NIV接口(80%),缓解呼吸困难(60%),避免气管切开术(55%)。患者通过RAM插管使用NIV的中位持续时间为7.7个月(IQR 3.7-20.6个月)。患者结果包括持续使用RAM套管(55%),改用传统NIV接口(15%)或吸氧(10%),脱离呼吸支持(5%)和死亡(15%)。使用RAM插管没有并发症。结论:我们的研究表明,在临床改善或对常规接口耐受之前,门诊通过RAM插管的NIV对各种诊断的儿童都是有用的,并且避免了气管切开术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outpatient Utilization of the RAM Cannula for Nasal Noninvasive Ventilation in Children.

Background: The RAM cannula® consists of nasal prongs that can be used to administer oxygen, continuous, and bilevel positive airway pressure therapies. Studies have reported the efficacy and utility of the RAM cannula in inpatients requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV); however, there is limited literature on the use of the RAM cannula to provide NIV in the outpatient setting.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of children who used NIV via RAM cannula in the outpatient setting.

Design: Retrospective review.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of children treated with outpatient NIV via RAM cannula at our institution between January 2010 and March 2023. The analyzed data included age, diagnoses, indications for NIV, duration of RAM cannula use, complications, and outcomes at 6 months.

Results: We identified 20 patients who used outpatient NIV via RAM cannula during the study period. The median age at initiation of NIV via RAM cannula was 5.8 months (IQR 2.4-9.9 months). Indications for NIV included sleep-related hypoventilation (15%), restrictive lung disease (25%), obstructive sleep apnea (45%), and chronic respiratory failure (50%), with 6 patients having ⩾2 indications for NIV. RAM cannula was utilized for inability to tolerate conventional NIV interfaces (80%), to alleviate dyspnea (60%), and to avoid tracheostomy (55%). Patients used NIV via RAM cannula for a median duration of 7.7 months (IQR 3.7-20.6 months). Patient outcomes included ongoing usage of RAM cannula (55%), changing to conventional NIV interfaces (15%) or oxygen (10%), weaning off respiratory support (5%), and death (15%). There were no complications related to using the RAM cannula.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the utility of outpatient NIV via RAM cannula in children with a variety of diagnoses until clinical improvement or tolerance of conventional interfaces, and for avoidance of tracheostomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Giant Congenital Ovarian Cyst Presenting as an Abdominal Mass. Influencing Factors on Independent Walking in Children With Lumbosacral Lipomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on a 5-Year Untethering Series. Neonatal Sepsis: Aetiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Advances and Management Strategies. Assessment of Voiding Dysfunction and Nocturnal Enuresis Rates in Primary School Children in Nablus, Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Multi-Center Retrospective Database Evaluation of Pediatric Subjects Diagnosed With Methemoglobinemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1