耳鼻喉科遗传服务在儿童听力损失评估中的定性经验。

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s12687-023-00649-9
Aaliyah Heyward, Kelsi Hagerty, Lauren Lichten, Julie Howell, Ching Siong Tey, Kavita Dedhia, Dio Kavalieratos, Nandini Govil
{"title":"耳鼻喉科遗传服务在儿童听力损失评估中的定性经验。","authors":"Aaliyah Heyward,&nbsp;Kelsi Hagerty,&nbsp;Lauren Lichten,&nbsp;Julie Howell,&nbsp;Ching Siong Tey,&nbsp;Kavita Dedhia,&nbsp;Dio Kavalieratos,&nbsp;Nandini Govil","doi":"10.1007/s12687-023-00649-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic testing is one of the most high-yield diagnostic tests in the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss, leading to a genetic diagnosis in 40-65% of patients. Previous research has focused on the utility of genetic testing in pediatric SNHL and otolaryngologists' general understanding of genetics. This qualitative study examines otolaryngologists' perceptions about facilitators and barriers when ordering genetic testing in the workup of pediatric hearing loss. Potential solutions for overcoming barriers are also explored. Eleven (N = 11) semi-structured interviews were conducted with otolaryngologists in the USA. Most participants were currently practicing in a southern, academic, urban setting and had completed a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship. Insurance was one of the main barriers to testing, and increased genetics provider accessibility was the most frequently cited solution to increase utilization of genetic services. Difficulty acquiring insurance coverage and unfamiliarity with the genetic testing process were the most common reasons otolaryngologists referred patients to genetics clinics for genetic testing, as opposed to ordering testing themselves. This study suggests that otolaryngologists recognize the importance and utility of genetic testing, but a lack of genetics-specific skills, knowledge, and resources makes it difficult for them to facilitate testing. Multidisciplinary hearing loss clinics that include genetics providers may increase the overall accessibility of genetic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":"14 4","pages":"377-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444707/pdf/12687_2023_Article_649.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The qualitative experiences of otolaryngologists with genetic services in pediatric hearing loss evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Aaliyah Heyward,&nbsp;Kelsi Hagerty,&nbsp;Lauren Lichten,&nbsp;Julie Howell,&nbsp;Ching Siong Tey,&nbsp;Kavita Dedhia,&nbsp;Dio Kavalieratos,&nbsp;Nandini Govil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12687-023-00649-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genetic testing is one of the most high-yield diagnostic tests in the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss, leading to a genetic diagnosis in 40-65% of patients. Previous research has focused on the utility of genetic testing in pediatric SNHL and otolaryngologists' general understanding of genetics. This qualitative study examines otolaryngologists' perceptions about facilitators and barriers when ordering genetic testing in the workup of pediatric hearing loss. Potential solutions for overcoming barriers are also explored. Eleven (N = 11) semi-structured interviews were conducted with otolaryngologists in the USA. Most participants were currently practicing in a southern, academic, urban setting and had completed a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship. Insurance was one of the main barriers to testing, and increased genetics provider accessibility was the most frequently cited solution to increase utilization of genetic services. Difficulty acquiring insurance coverage and unfamiliarity with the genetic testing process were the most common reasons otolaryngologists referred patients to genetics clinics for genetic testing, as opposed to ordering testing themselves. This study suggests that otolaryngologists recognize the importance and utility of genetic testing, but a lack of genetics-specific skills, knowledge, and resources makes it difficult for them to facilitate testing. Multidisciplinary hearing loss clinics that include genetics providers may increase the overall accessibility of genetic services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"377-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444707/pdf/12687_2023_Article_649.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00649-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00649-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因检测是评估儿童感音神经性(SNHL)听力损失的最高诊断检测之一,40-65%的患者可进行基因诊断。以前的研究主要集中在儿科SNHL基因检测的应用和耳鼻喉科医生对遗传学的一般理解。本定性研究考察了耳鼻喉科医生在订购儿童听力损失基因检测时对促进因素和障碍的看法。还探讨了克服障碍的潜在解决办法。11名(N = 11)美国耳鼻喉科医生进行了半结构化访谈。大多数参与者目前在南方,学术,城市环境中执业,并完成了儿科耳鼻喉科奖学金。保险是检测的主要障碍之一,增加遗传学提供者的可及性是最常被引用的提高遗传服务利用率的解决方案。耳鼻喉科医生将患者转到遗传学诊所进行基因检测,而不是自己订购检测,最常见的原因是难以获得保险覆盖范围和不熟悉基因检测过程。这项研究表明,耳鼻喉科医生认识到基因检测的重要性和实用性,但缺乏基因专业技能、知识和资源,使他们很难促进检测。包括遗传学提供者在内的多学科听力损失诊所可能会增加遗传服务的总体可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The qualitative experiences of otolaryngologists with genetic services in pediatric hearing loss evaluation.

Genetic testing is one of the most high-yield diagnostic tests in the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss, leading to a genetic diagnosis in 40-65% of patients. Previous research has focused on the utility of genetic testing in pediatric SNHL and otolaryngologists' general understanding of genetics. This qualitative study examines otolaryngologists' perceptions about facilitators and barriers when ordering genetic testing in the workup of pediatric hearing loss. Potential solutions for overcoming barriers are also explored. Eleven (N = 11) semi-structured interviews were conducted with otolaryngologists in the USA. Most participants were currently practicing in a southern, academic, urban setting and had completed a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship. Insurance was one of the main barriers to testing, and increased genetics provider accessibility was the most frequently cited solution to increase utilization of genetic services. Difficulty acquiring insurance coverage and unfamiliarity with the genetic testing process were the most common reasons otolaryngologists referred patients to genetics clinics for genetic testing, as opposed to ordering testing themselves. This study suggests that otolaryngologists recognize the importance and utility of genetic testing, but a lack of genetics-specific skills, knowledge, and resources makes it difficult for them to facilitate testing. Multidisciplinary hearing loss clinics that include genetics providers may increase the overall accessibility of genetic services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Population molecular genetics in Brazil: From genomic databases and research to the implementation of precision medicine. Knowledge and perception of medical students on genetics in the genomic era. Key challenges in developing a gene therapy for Usher syndrome: machine-assisted scoping review. Key contextual factors involved with participation in medical and genomic screening and research for African American and White Americans: a qualitative inquiry. Factors influencing pregnant women's decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1