具有严重行为问题的成年人的等价阶级形成。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Record Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s40732-023-00540-6
Jesús Alonso-Vega, María Xesús Froxán-Parga, Erik Arntzen
{"title":"具有严重行为问题的成年人的等价阶级形成。","authors":"Jesús Alonso-Vega,&nbsp;María Xesús Froxán-Parga,&nbsp;Erik Arntzen","doi":"10.1007/s40732-023-00540-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stimulus equivalence is a behavioral phenomenon that has been related to complex human behavior (e.g., remembering, cognitive functioning, and symbolic behavior). As a rule, people diagnosed with severe mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) that exhibit delusional and hallucinatory behavior, and disorganized speech have shown cognitive impairment (e.g., processing speed, reasoning/problem solving). Not enough research has analyzed the stimulus equivalence performance in this population. This study aims to investigate the stimulus equivalence performance in adults diagnosed with severe mental disorders. In particular, this study analyzes the many-to-one (MTO) and one-to-many (OTM) training structures effects, and the simultaneous (SIM) and the simple-to-complex (STC) training and testing protocol effects on equivalence class formation in this population. To achieve it, we analyzed the behavior of 18 participants diagnosed with severe mental disorders in three different conditions (Condition 1 OTM/SIM; 2 MTO/SIM; and 3 MTO/STC). Behavior consistent with stimulus equivalence was found in 11 out of 13 participants who had finished the study (5 participants decided to leave before completing the tasks). STC yielded better results than the SIM protocol. No differences were found between MTO and OTM training structures. Implications and suggestions for further research have been discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47856,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Record","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equivalence Class Formation in Adults with Severe Behavioral Problems.\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Alonso-Vega,&nbsp;María Xesús Froxán-Parga,&nbsp;Erik Arntzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40732-023-00540-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stimulus equivalence is a behavioral phenomenon that has been related to complex human behavior (e.g., remembering, cognitive functioning, and symbolic behavior). As a rule, people diagnosed with severe mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) that exhibit delusional and hallucinatory behavior, and disorganized speech have shown cognitive impairment (e.g., processing speed, reasoning/problem solving). Not enough research has analyzed the stimulus equivalence performance in this population. This study aims to investigate the stimulus equivalence performance in adults diagnosed with severe mental disorders. In particular, this study analyzes the many-to-one (MTO) and one-to-many (OTM) training structures effects, and the simultaneous (SIM) and the simple-to-complex (STC) training and testing protocol effects on equivalence class formation in this population. To achieve it, we analyzed the behavior of 18 participants diagnosed with severe mental disorders in three different conditions (Condition 1 OTM/SIM; 2 MTO/SIM; and 3 MTO/STC). Behavior consistent with stimulus equivalence was found in 11 out of 13 participants who had finished the study (5 participants decided to leave before completing the tasks). STC yielded better results than the SIM protocol. No differences were found between MTO and OTM training structures. Implications and suggestions for further research have been discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Record\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00540-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Record","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00540-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刺激对等是一种与复杂的人类行为(如记忆、认知功能和象征行为)有关的行为现象。通常,被诊断患有严重精神障碍(如精神分裂症、双相情感障碍)、表现出妄想和幻觉行为以及言语紊乱的人会表现出认知障碍(如处理速度、推理/解决问题)。没有足够的研究来分析这一群体的刺激等效性能。本研究旨在调查被诊断为严重精神障碍的成年人的刺激等效性表现。特别是,本研究分析了多对一(MTO)和一对多(OTM)训练结构的影响,以及同时(SIM)和简单到复杂(STC)训练和测试协议对该群体等价类形成的影响。为了实现这一目标,我们分析了18名被诊断为严重精神障碍的参与者在三种不同条件下的行为(条件1 OTM/SIM、2 MTO/SIM和3 MTO/STC)。在完成研究的13名参与者中,有11人的行为与刺激等效性一致(5名参与者决定在完成任务前离开)。STC产生了比SIM协议更好的结果。MTO和OTM培训结构之间没有发现差异。讨论了对进一步研究的启示和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equivalence Class Formation in Adults with Severe Behavioral Problems.

Stimulus equivalence is a behavioral phenomenon that has been related to complex human behavior (e.g., remembering, cognitive functioning, and symbolic behavior). As a rule, people diagnosed with severe mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) that exhibit delusional and hallucinatory behavior, and disorganized speech have shown cognitive impairment (e.g., processing speed, reasoning/problem solving). Not enough research has analyzed the stimulus equivalence performance in this population. This study aims to investigate the stimulus equivalence performance in adults diagnosed with severe mental disorders. In particular, this study analyzes the many-to-one (MTO) and one-to-many (OTM) training structures effects, and the simultaneous (SIM) and the simple-to-complex (STC) training and testing protocol effects on equivalence class formation in this population. To achieve it, we analyzed the behavior of 18 participants diagnosed with severe mental disorders in three different conditions (Condition 1 OTM/SIM; 2 MTO/SIM; and 3 MTO/STC). Behavior consistent with stimulus equivalence was found in 11 out of 13 participants who had finished the study (5 participants decided to leave before completing the tasks). STC yielded better results than the SIM protocol. No differences were found between MTO and OTM training structures. Implications and suggestions for further research have been discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Record
Psychological Record PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Psychological Record publishes empirical and conceptual articles related to the field of behavior analysis, behavior science, and behavior theory. The journal welcomes investigations of basic behavioral processes, as well as translational studies that bridge experimental and applied analyses of behavior. Conceptual articles pertinent to the theory and philosophy of behaviorism are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Respondent-Type Matching-to-Sample Procedure: A Comparison of One-to-Many and Linear Procedure for Establishing Equivalence Responding Avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons: Shaping Children’s Sustainable Behavior in a Digital Game The Role of Volume in Relational Density Theory: Isolating the Effects of Class Size and Nodal Distance on Density and Resistance in Equivalence Classes Feel the Func: Interpreting IRAP Performances Based on Cfunc versus Crel Stimulus Properties Under-explored effects of structure on equivalence class formation: A commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1