应用金属伪影减少算法进行临时固定装置与牙根接触的 CBCT 诊断:不足以降低假阳性率。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20220396
Victoria McLaughlin, Jie Liu, Sonya Kalim, Kristin Nguyen, Do-Gyoon Kim, Zongyang Sun
{"title":"应用金属伪影减少算法进行临时固定装置与牙根接触的 CBCT 诊断:不足以降低假阳性率。","authors":"Victoria McLaughlin, Jie Liu, Sonya Kalim, Kristin Nguyen, Do-Gyoon Kim, Zongyang Sun","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20220396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It was recently found that when cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to examine temporary anchorage device (TAD)-tooth root contact, it tends to yield high false-positive (FP) diagnoses. This study investigated whether application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size can remediate this problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 fresh pig cadaver mandibles underwent TAD placement bilaterally at first molar lingual furcation regions. CBCT scans were taken under varied MAR (absence, presence) and voxel-size (400 µm, 200 µm) settings. Then, TADs were removed and a micro-CT scan (27 µm voxel-size) of the TAD placement site was performed. Three raters, blinded of CBCT scan setting, independently diagnosed whether TADs were in contact with roots. The reliability and accuracy of CBCT diagnoses using micro-CT as the gold-standard were statistically examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, CBCT diagnoses had intrarater (Cohen's κ: 0.54-1) and interrater (Fleiss' κ: 0.73-0.81) reliability, within the moderate to excellent range, which did not vary with MAR setting or scan voxel-size. For diagnostic accuracy, FP rate among all raters was mostly in the 15-25% range and did not change with MAR or scan voxel-size settings (McNemar tests, <i>p</i> > 0.05) while false-negative rate was relatively minimal and only occurred to one rater (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When using CBCT to diagnose possible TAD-root contact, applying a currently available Planmeca MAR algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size from 400 µm to 200 µm may not decrease FP rate. Further optimization of the MAR algorithm for this purpose may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm for CBCT diagnosis of temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact: inadequate to reduce false-positive rate.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria McLaughlin, Jie Liu, Sonya Kalim, Kristin Nguyen, Do-Gyoon Kim, Zongyang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/dmfr.20220396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It was recently found that when cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to examine temporary anchorage device (TAD)-tooth root contact, it tends to yield high false-positive (FP) diagnoses. This study investigated whether application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size can remediate this problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 fresh pig cadaver mandibles underwent TAD placement bilaterally at first molar lingual furcation regions. CBCT scans were taken under varied MAR (absence, presence) and voxel-size (400 µm, 200 µm) settings. Then, TADs were removed and a micro-CT scan (27 µm voxel-size) of the TAD placement site was performed. Three raters, blinded of CBCT scan setting, independently diagnosed whether TADs were in contact with roots. The reliability and accuracy of CBCT diagnoses using micro-CT as the gold-standard were statistically examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, CBCT diagnoses had intrarater (Cohen's κ: 0.54-1) and interrater (Fleiss' κ: 0.73-0.81) reliability, within the moderate to excellent range, which did not vary with MAR setting or scan voxel-size. For diagnostic accuracy, FP rate among all raters was mostly in the 15-25% range and did not change with MAR or scan voxel-size settings (McNemar tests, <i>p</i> > 0.05) while false-negative rate was relatively minimal and only occurred to one rater (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When using CBCT to diagnose possible TAD-root contact, applying a currently available Planmeca MAR algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size from 400 µm to 200 µm may not decrease FP rate. Further optimization of the MAR algorithm for this purpose may be needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近发现,当使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查临时固定装置(TAD)与牙根接触时,往往会产生较高的假阳性(FP)诊断。本研究探讨了应用金属伪影减少(MAR)算法或减小 CBCT 扫描体素大小是否能解决这一问题。方法:18 只新鲜猪尸体下颌骨在第一磨牙舌侧沟区进行了双侧 TAD 放置。在不同的 MAR(无、有)和体素大小(400 微米、200 微米)设置下进行 CBCT 扫描。然后,取出 TAD 并对 TAD 放置部位进行微型 CT 扫描(27 微米体素大小)。三名对 CBCT 扫描设置进行盲测的评分员独立诊断 TAD 是否与牙根接触。以微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)作为金标准,对 CBCT 诊断的可靠性和准确性进行了统计学检验:一般来说,CBCT 诊断的内部评分(Cohen's κ:0.54-1)和内部评分(Fleiss's κ:0.73-0.81)的可靠性在中等到优秀的范围内,且不随 MAR 设置或扫描体素大小而变化。在诊断准确性方面,所有评分者的FP率大多在15%-25%之间,且不随MAR或扫描体素大小设置的变化而变化(McNemar检验,P>0.05),而假阴性率相对较低,仅有一名评分者(9%)出现假阴性:结论:在使用 CBCT 诊断可能的 TAD 根接触时,应用目前可用的 Planmeca MAR 算法或将 CBCT 扫描体素尺寸从 400 微米减小到 200 微米可能不会降低 FP 率。为此,可能需要进一步优化 MAR 算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm for CBCT diagnosis of temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact: inadequate to reduce false-positive rate.

Objectives: It was recently found that when cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to examine temporary anchorage device (TAD)-tooth root contact, it tends to yield high false-positive (FP) diagnoses. This study investigated whether application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size can remediate this problem.

Methods: 18 fresh pig cadaver mandibles underwent TAD placement bilaterally at first molar lingual furcation regions. CBCT scans were taken under varied MAR (absence, presence) and voxel-size (400 µm, 200 µm) settings. Then, TADs were removed and a micro-CT scan (27 µm voxel-size) of the TAD placement site was performed. Three raters, blinded of CBCT scan setting, independently diagnosed whether TADs were in contact with roots. The reliability and accuracy of CBCT diagnoses using micro-CT as the gold-standard were statistically examined.

Results: Generally, CBCT diagnoses had intrarater (Cohen's κ: 0.54-1) and interrater (Fleiss' κ: 0.73-0.81) reliability, within the moderate to excellent range, which did not vary with MAR setting or scan voxel-size. For diagnostic accuracy, FP rate among all raters was mostly in the 15-25% range and did not change with MAR or scan voxel-size settings (McNemar tests, p > 0.05) while false-negative rate was relatively minimal and only occurred to one rater (9%).

Conclusions: When using CBCT to diagnose possible TAD-root contact, applying a currently available Planmeca MAR algorithm or reducing CBCT scan voxel-size from 400 µm to 200 µm may not decrease FP rate. Further optimization of the MAR algorithm for this purpose may be needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
Peracetic Acid Efficacy on Disinfection of Photostimulable Phosphor Plates. An attempt to generate panoramic radiographs including jaw cysts using StyleGAN3. Facial vascular visualization enhancement based on optical detection technology. The relationship between the uptake of alveolar bone inflammation and of cervical lymph nodes on fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Comparison of quantitative radiomorphometric predictors of healthy and MRONJ-affected bone using panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1