使用替代输入/输出方法的人的元可及性的实证评价。

Q3 Health Professions Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.3233/SHTI230646
Jeanne Choi, Hyun W Ka
{"title":"使用替代输入/输出方法的人的元可及性的实证评价。","authors":"Jeanne Choi,&nbsp;Hyun W Ka","doi":"10.3233/SHTI230646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research has analyzed the accessibility of the current metaverse platforms from the perspective of screen reader and switch scanning interface users, using the mixture of quantitative and qualitative assessments. To this end, the two representative metaverse platforms, ZEPETO and Roblox, were targeted. As a result, it was found that the current metaverse platforms are not carefully designed with accessibility in mind. Many content elements and controls in the metaverse environment suffers from the lack of alternative text description and appropriate markups which are essential to make it perceivable and recognizable by assistive technology. People with severe disabilities are very likely to find it difficult or impossible to independently navigate the current metaverse environment, because they do not provide any viable means of orientation and mobility in the 3D virtual space at all. The UI/UX of the current metaverse platforms also do not provide adequate feedback to help people with limited sensory/motor functions to understand the purpose and function of it. Overall, thereby, the current metaverse environment is not robust enough to reliably work with a wide range of assistive technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39242,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","volume":"306 ","pages":"371-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Evaluation of Metaverse Accessibility for People Who Use Alternative Input/Output Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Jeanne Choi,&nbsp;Hyun W Ka\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SHTI230646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research has analyzed the accessibility of the current metaverse platforms from the perspective of screen reader and switch scanning interface users, using the mixture of quantitative and qualitative assessments. To this end, the two representative metaverse platforms, ZEPETO and Roblox, were targeted. As a result, it was found that the current metaverse platforms are not carefully designed with accessibility in mind. Many content elements and controls in the metaverse environment suffers from the lack of alternative text description and appropriate markups which are essential to make it perceivable and recognizable by assistive technology. People with severe disabilities are very likely to find it difficult or impossible to independently navigate the current metaverse environment, because they do not provide any viable means of orientation and mobility in the 3D virtual space at all. The UI/UX of the current metaverse platforms also do not provide adequate feedback to help people with limited sensory/motor functions to understand the purpose and function of it. Overall, thereby, the current metaverse environment is not robust enough to reliably work with a wide range of assistive technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"306 \",\"pages\":\"371-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用定量和定性相结合的评估方法,从屏幕阅读器和切换扫描界面用户的角度分析了当前虚拟世界平台的可访问性。为此,我们瞄准了两个具有代表性的虚拟世界平台ZEPETO和Roblox。因此,我们发现当前的虚拟世界平台在设计时并没有考虑到可访问性。元环境中的许多内容元素和控件都缺乏替代文本描述和适当的标记,而这些都是辅助技术能够感知和识别的必要条件。严重残疾的人很可能会发现很难或不可能独立地在当前的虚拟环境中导航,因为他们根本无法在3D虚拟空间中提供任何可行的定向和移动方式。当前虚拟世界平台的UI/UX也没有提供足够的反馈来帮助那些感觉/运动功能有限的人理解它的目的和功能。因此,总的来说,当前的元环境还不够健壮,无法可靠地使用各种辅助技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical Evaluation of Metaverse Accessibility for People Who Use Alternative Input/Output Methods.

This research has analyzed the accessibility of the current metaverse platforms from the perspective of screen reader and switch scanning interface users, using the mixture of quantitative and qualitative assessments. To this end, the two representative metaverse platforms, ZEPETO and Roblox, were targeted. As a result, it was found that the current metaverse platforms are not carefully designed with accessibility in mind. Many content elements and controls in the metaverse environment suffers from the lack of alternative text description and appropriate markups which are essential to make it perceivable and recognizable by assistive technology. People with severe disabilities are very likely to find it difficult or impossible to independently navigate the current metaverse environment, because they do not provide any viable means of orientation and mobility in the 3D virtual space at all. The UI/UX of the current metaverse platforms also do not provide adequate feedback to help people with limited sensory/motor functions to understand the purpose and function of it. Overall, thereby, the current metaverse environment is not robust enough to reliably work with a wide range of assistive technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1463
期刊介绍: This book series was started in 1990 to promote research conducted under the auspices of the EC programmes’ Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM) and Biomedical and Health Research (BHR) bioengineering branch. A driving aspect of international health informatics is that telecommunication technology, rehabilitative technology, intelligent home technology and many other components are moving together and form one integrated world of information and communication media.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Assessment Reveals Myopic Regression After ICL Implantation in High Myopia. Construction of Guideline-Based Decision Tree for Medication Recommendation. Systemic Risk Management Plan for Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Why and How? Mental Health Patient Portals Aimed at Depression: A Picture Close to Reality. Mettertron - Bridging Metadata Repositories and Terminology Servers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1