高压氧医学假治疗的验证:随机试验。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.28920/dhm53.1.51-54
Pierre Louge, Rodrigue Pignel, Jacques Serratrice, Jerome Stirnemann
{"title":"高压氧医学假治疗的验证:随机试验。","authors":"Pierre Louge, Rodrigue Pignel, Jacques Serratrice, Jerome Stirnemann","doi":"10.28920/dhm53.1.51-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the lowest possible atmospheric pressure in the 111-152 kPa (1.1-1.5 atmospheres absolute [atm abs]) range that would require the patients to equalise their ears, allowing an effective sham for a 203 kPa (2.0 atm abs) hyperbaric exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomised controlled study on 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups (compression to 111, 132 and 152 kPa (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 atm abs) to determine the minimum pressure to obtain blinding. Secondly, we applied additional blinding strategies (faster compression with ventilation during the fictitious compression time, heating at compression, cooling at decompression) on 25 new volunteers in order to enhance blinding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants who did not believe they had been compressed to 203 kPa was significantly higher in the 111 kPa compressed arm than in the other two arms (11/18 vs 5/19 and 4/18 respectively; P = 0.049 and P = 0.041, Fisher's exact test). There was no difference between compressions to 132 and 152 kPa. By applying additional blinding strategies, the number of participants who believed they had been compressed to 203 kPa increased to 86.5 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A compression to 132 kPa, (1.3 atm abs, 3 metres of seawater equivalent) combined with the additional blinding strategies of forced ventilation, enclosure heating and compression in five minutes, simulates a therapeutic compression table and can be used as a hyperbaric placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":"51-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of sham treatment in hyperbaric medicine: a randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Louge, Rodrigue Pignel, Jacques Serratrice, Jerome Stirnemann\",\"doi\":\"10.28920/dhm53.1.51-54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the lowest possible atmospheric pressure in the 111-152 kPa (1.1-1.5 atmospheres absolute [atm abs]) range that would require the patients to equalise their ears, allowing an effective sham for a 203 kPa (2.0 atm abs) hyperbaric exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomised controlled study on 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups (compression to 111, 132 and 152 kPa (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 atm abs) to determine the minimum pressure to obtain blinding. Secondly, we applied additional blinding strategies (faster compression with ventilation during the fictitious compression time, heating at compression, cooling at decompression) on 25 new volunteers in order to enhance blinding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants who did not believe they had been compressed to 203 kPa was significantly higher in the 111 kPa compressed arm than in the other two arms (11/18 vs 5/19 and 4/18 respectively; P = 0.049 and P = 0.041, Fisher's exact test). There was no difference between compressions to 132 and 152 kPa. By applying additional blinding strategies, the number of participants who believed they had been compressed to 203 kPa increased to 86.5 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A compression to 132 kPa, (1.3 atm abs, 3 metres of seawater equivalent) combined with the additional blinding strategies of forced ventilation, enclosure heating and compression in five minutes, simulates a therapeutic compression table and can be used as a hyperbaric placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"51-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318180/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.1.51-54\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.1.51-54","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究旨在确定在 111-152 千帕(1.1-1.5 个绝对大气压[abs])范围内需要患者平衡耳朵的最低大气压,从而为 203 千帕(2.0 个绝对大气压)高压氧暴露提供有效假象:我们对 60 名志愿者进行了随机对照研究,分为 3 组(压力分别为 111、132 和 152 kPa(1.1、1.3、1.5 atm abs)),以确定获得盲法的最低压力。其次,我们对 25 名新志愿者采用了额外的致盲策略(在虚构的加压时间内加快加压并通气、加压时加热、减压时冷却),以增强致盲效果:在 111 kPa 压缩组中,不相信自己已被压缩至 203 kPa 的参与者人数明显高于其他两组(分别为 11/18 对 5/19 和 4/18;P = 0.049 和 P = 0.041,费雪精确检验)。压缩至 132 和 152 千帕之间没有差异。通过采用额外的盲法,认为自己被按压到 203 kPa 的参与者人数增加到了 86.5%:结论:压缩至 132 kPa(1.3 atm abs,3 米海水当量),再加上强制通风、围栏加热和在五分钟内压缩的额外盲法,可以模拟治疗压缩台,并可用作高压氧安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of sham treatment in hyperbaric medicine: a randomised trial.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the lowest possible atmospheric pressure in the 111-152 kPa (1.1-1.5 atmospheres absolute [atm abs]) range that would require the patients to equalise their ears, allowing an effective sham for a 203 kPa (2.0 atm abs) hyperbaric exposure.

Methods: We performed a randomised controlled study on 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups (compression to 111, 132 and 152 kPa (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 atm abs) to determine the minimum pressure to obtain blinding. Secondly, we applied additional blinding strategies (faster compression with ventilation during the fictitious compression time, heating at compression, cooling at decompression) on 25 new volunteers in order to enhance blinding.

Results: The number of participants who did not believe they had been compressed to 203 kPa was significantly higher in the 111 kPa compressed arm than in the other two arms (11/18 vs 5/19 and 4/18 respectively; P = 0.049 and P = 0.041, Fisher's exact test). There was no difference between compressions to 132 and 152 kPa. By applying additional blinding strategies, the number of participants who believed they had been compressed to 203 kPa increased to 86.5 %.

Conclusions: A compression to 132 kPa, (1.3 atm abs, 3 metres of seawater equivalent) combined with the additional blinding strategies of forced ventilation, enclosure heating and compression in five minutes, simulates a therapeutic compression table and can be used as a hyperbaric placebo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic emission, an innovative diagnosis tool for therapeutic hyperbaric chambers: or how to requalify safely using pneumatic pressure test. Arterial dissection in scuba divers: a potential adverse manifestation of the physiological effects of immersion. Bispectral index with density spectral array (BIS-DSA) monitoring in a patient with inner ear and cerebral decompression sickness. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Hyperbaric medicine and climate footprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1