2个葡萄牙中心不同胶囊内窥镜平台小肠胶囊内窥镜性能指标适用性的关键性分析

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000523773
Catarina Gomes, Catarina O'Neill, Rolando Pinho, Rita Barosa, Ana Ponte, Pedro Magalhães-Costa, Adélia Rodrigues, Cristina Chagas, João Carvalho
{"title":"2个葡萄牙中心不同胶囊内窥镜平台小肠胶囊内窥镜性能指标适用性的关键性分析","authors":"Catarina Gomes,&nbsp;Catarina O'Neill,&nbsp;Rolando Pinho,&nbsp;Rita Barosa,&nbsp;Ana Ponte,&nbsp;Pedro Magalhães-Costa,&nbsp;Adélia Rodrigues,&nbsp;Cristina Chagas,&nbsp;João Carvalho","doi":"10.1159/000523773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (<i>p</i> = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (<i>p</i> = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/2b/pjg-0030-0230.PMC10305259.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Analysis of the Applicability of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Performance Measures among 2 Portuguese Centers with Different Capsule Endoscopy Platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Catarina Gomes,&nbsp;Catarina O'Neill,&nbsp;Rolando Pinho,&nbsp;Rita Barosa,&nbsp;Ana Ponte,&nbsp;Pedro Magalhães-Costa,&nbsp;Adélia Rodrigues,&nbsp;Cristina Chagas,&nbsp;João Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000523773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (<i>p</i> = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (<i>p</i> = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/2b/pjg-0030-0230.PMC10305259.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:欧洲胃肠内窥镜学会(ESGE)确定了小肠胶囊内窥镜(SBCE)质量基准的必要性,并制定了一套性能指标(PM)。本研究的目的是批判性地评估两个葡萄牙中心具有不同的SBCE平台的SBCE PM的一致性。方法:作者对2个葡萄牙中心连续18个月的SBCE进行了横断面分析,这些中心使用了两种不同的SBCE平台Mirocam®(IntroMedic,首尔,韩国)和PillCam®(Medtronic, Yokneam,以色列)。两中心共评估10个PM(6个大调,4个小调)并进行比较。结果:共纳入493例SBCE。ESGE建立的最低标准是3/6个重度PM(完全可视化、病变检出率和胶囊保留率),而4个轻度PM均未达到。两个中心的PM依从性差异显著:小肠完全显像率分别为95.9和90% (p = 0.01),诊断率分别为50.6和63% (p = 0.005),根据Brotz量表,小肠清洁水平达到69.54和84.6% (p≤0.001),胶囊潴留高风险患者分别给予通畅胶囊4.2和73% (p≤0.001)。结论:本研究强调并批判性地讨论了在定义更现实的PM阈值时应该考虑的技术和组织问题,旨在提高SBCE质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Analysis of the Applicability of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Performance Measures among 2 Portuguese Centers with Different Capsule Endoscopy Platforms.

Introduction: The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms.

Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers.

Results: A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (p = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (p = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (p ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Staging, Associated Genetic Syndromes and Particularities of Their Clinical Approach. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Gynecological Surgery: An Atypical Endoscopic Diagnosis. Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Schwannoma of Common Bile Duct: A Clinico-Radiologic Diagnostic Quagmire – A Case Report Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Band Ligation of a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1