单侧唇裂重建中侧位的影响:全球唇裂外科医生调查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1177/10556656231181904
Ambika Chadha, Daniel Bradley, Matthew Fell, Maria Fernanda, Atenas Bustamante, David Chong
{"title":"单侧唇裂重建中侧位的影响:全球唇裂外科医生调查。","authors":"Ambika Chadha, Daniel Bradley, Matthew Fell, Maria Fernanda, Atenas Bustamante, David Chong","doi":"10.1177/10556656231181904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the impact of directional laterality in complete Unilateral Cleft Lip (UCL) amongst the global cleft surgeon community.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Global distribution of online survey distributed in English and Spanish.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Cleft surgeons from around the world.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Survey participant perception of the impact of laterality on: (1) cleft presentation (2) surgical challenge and (3) surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 453 cleft surgeons located in 54 countries around the world. 221 (49%) had previously considered differences in patients presenting with a left- versus right-sided UCL. 95 (21%) considered right-sided clefts more difficult to reconstruct, 37 (8%) reported left-sided clefts to be more difficult and 321 (71%) reported no difference in difficulty between the cleft sides. Higher volume cleft surgeons, characterised by those reporting cleft as their principal area of practice and performing >20 cleft operations per year, were more likely to have both previously considered differences in laterality in cleft and to report right-sided unilateral cleft lip to be more difficult to primarily reconstruct. 395 (87%) did not consider surgical outcomes to be influenced by cleft laterality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reports perceptions on cleft laterality from a large body of global surgeons and suggests a trend for increased difficulty in right-sided compared to left-sided cleft lip reconstruction, where such laterality-associated difficulty is perceived.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implications of Laterality in Unilateral Cleft Lip Reconstruction: A Global Survey of Cleft Surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Ambika Chadha, Daniel Bradley, Matthew Fell, Maria Fernanda, Atenas Bustamante, David Chong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231181904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the impact of directional laterality in complete Unilateral Cleft Lip (UCL) amongst the global cleft surgeon community.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Global distribution of online survey distributed in English and Spanish.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Cleft surgeons from around the world.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Survey participant perception of the impact of laterality on: (1) cleft presentation (2) surgical challenge and (3) surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 453 cleft surgeons located in 54 countries around the world. 221 (49%) had previously considered differences in patients presenting with a left- versus right-sided UCL. 95 (21%) considered right-sided clefts more difficult to reconstruct, 37 (8%) reported left-sided clefts to be more difficult and 321 (71%) reported no difference in difficulty between the cleft sides. Higher volume cleft surgeons, characterised by those reporting cleft as their principal area of practice and performing >20 cleft operations per year, were more likely to have both previously considered differences in laterality in cleft and to report right-sided unilateral cleft lip to be more difficult to primarily reconstruct. 395 (87%) did not consider surgical outcomes to be influenced by cleft laterality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reports perceptions on cleft laterality from a large body of global surgeons and suggests a trend for increased difficulty in right-sided compared to left-sided cleft lip reconstruction, where such laterality-associated difficulty is perceived.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231181904\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231181904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在全球唇裂外科医生群体中探讨方向性侧位对完全性单侧唇裂(UCL)的影响:设计:横断面调查研究:参与者:来自世界各地的唇裂外科医生:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:调查参与者对侧位对以下方面影响的看法:(1) 裂隙表现 (2) 手术挑战和 (3) 手术结果:全球 54 个国家的 453 名唇裂外科医生对调查做出了回复。221人(49%)曾考虑过左侧与右侧UCL患者的差异。95人(21%)认为右侧裂隙更难重建,37人(8%)认为左侧裂隙更难重建,321人(71%)认为两侧裂隙的重建难度没有差异。裂隙手术量较大的外科医生,即报告裂隙为其主要执业领域且每年进行超过 20 例裂隙手术的外科医生,更有可能以前考虑过裂隙侧位的差异,也更有可能报告右侧单侧唇裂更难主要重建。395人(87%)认为手术结果不受唇裂侧位的影响:这项调查报告了全球众多外科医生对唇裂侧位的看法,并表明在认为唇裂侧位相关的情况下,右侧唇裂重建的难度有增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Implications of Laterality in Unilateral Cleft Lip Reconstruction: A Global Survey of Cleft Surgeons.

Objective: To explore the impact of directional laterality in complete Unilateral Cleft Lip (UCL) amongst the global cleft surgeon community.

Design: Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: Global distribution of online survey distributed in English and Spanish.

Participants: Cleft surgeons from around the world.

Main outcome measures: Survey participant perception of the impact of laterality on: (1) cleft presentation (2) surgical challenge and (3) surgical outcomes.

Results: Responses were received from 453 cleft surgeons located in 54 countries around the world. 221 (49%) had previously considered differences in patients presenting with a left- versus right-sided UCL. 95 (21%) considered right-sided clefts more difficult to reconstruct, 37 (8%) reported left-sided clefts to be more difficult and 321 (71%) reported no difference in difficulty between the cleft sides. Higher volume cleft surgeons, characterised by those reporting cleft as their principal area of practice and performing >20 cleft operations per year, were more likely to have both previously considered differences in laterality in cleft and to report right-sided unilateral cleft lip to be more difficult to primarily reconstruct. 395 (87%) did not consider surgical outcomes to be influenced by cleft laterality.

Conclusions: This survey reports perceptions on cleft laterality from a large body of global surgeons and suggests a trend for increased difficulty in right-sided compared to left-sided cleft lip reconstruction, where such laterality-associated difficulty is perceived.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Where is the Care? Identifying the Impact of Rurality on SLP Caseloads and Treatment Decisions for Children with Cleft Palate. The Role of Postoperative Nasal Stents in Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Evaluating Prenatal Diagnostic Imaging for Micrognathia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Family Experiences with Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis: Thematic Analysis of Online Discussion Boards. Protocol Registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1