职业经验档案的效度与信度。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2022.2027009
Karen E Atler, Anne G Fisher
{"title":"职业经验档案的效度与信度。","authors":"Karen E Atler,&nbsp;Anne G Fisher","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2022.2027009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new tool, the Occupational Experience Profile (OEP). The OEP was designed to be used to evaluate people's levels of experiences of pleasure, productivity, restoration, and social connection during their occupational performances.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate aspects of validity and reliability of the OEP Pleasure, Productivity, Restoration and Social connection scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight occupational therapy students each completed three OEPs. Many-faceted Rasch analyses were then used to examine rating scale structure, dimensionality, and reliability of each OEP scale. Pearson product moment correlations were used to evaluate the strength of the relationships among the four scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the four OEP rating scales demonstrated effective rating scale functioning. The OEP items on each scale demonstrated acceptable levels of item goodness of fit and worked together to define a unidimensional scale of occupational experiences. The four scales appear to measure different but interrelated constructs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide preliminary evidence to support the validity and reliability of the OEP scales, but further research on larger and more diverse samples is recommended.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The OEP has the potential to be used in occupational therapy practice and research to evaluate how people experience their occupational performances.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Occupational Experience Profile.\",\"authors\":\"Karen E Atler,&nbsp;Anne G Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11038128.2022.2027009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new tool, the Occupational Experience Profile (OEP). The OEP was designed to be used to evaluate people's levels of experiences of pleasure, productivity, restoration, and social connection during their occupational performances.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate aspects of validity and reliability of the OEP Pleasure, Productivity, Restoration and Social connection scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight occupational therapy students each completed three OEPs. Many-faceted Rasch analyses were then used to examine rating scale structure, dimensionality, and reliability of each OEP scale. Pearson product moment correlations were used to evaluate the strength of the relationships among the four scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the four OEP rating scales demonstrated effective rating scale functioning. The OEP items on each scale demonstrated acceptable levels of item goodness of fit and worked together to define a unidimensional scale of occupational experiences. The four scales appear to measure different but interrelated constructs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide preliminary evidence to support the validity and reliability of the OEP scales, but further research on larger and more diverse samples is recommended.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The OEP has the potential to be used in occupational therapy practice and research to evaluate how people experience their occupational performances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2027009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2027009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估一种新工具——职业经验量表(OEP)的心理测量特性。OEP被设计用来评估人们在职业表现中的快乐、生产力、恢复和社会联系的体验水平。目的:评价OEP快乐、生产力、恢复和社会联系量表的效度和信度。方法:58名职业治疗学生每人完成3份oep。然后使用多方面的Rasch分析来检查评分表结构,维度和每个OEP量表的可靠性。使用Pearson积矩相关来评估四个量表之间关系的强度。结果:四个OEP量表均显示出有效的评定量表功能。每个量表上的OEP项目显示出可接受的项目契合度水平,并共同定义了一个单向度的职业经历量表。这四个量表似乎测量了不同但相互关联的构念。结论:本研究结果为OEP量表的效度和信度提供了初步证据,但仍需在更大、更多样化的样本上进行进一步研究。意义:OEP在职业治疗实践和研究中有潜力用于评估人们如何体验他们的职业表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the Occupational Experience Profile.

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a new tool, the Occupational Experience Profile (OEP). The OEP was designed to be used to evaluate people's levels of experiences of pleasure, productivity, restoration, and social connection during their occupational performances.

Aim: To evaluate aspects of validity and reliability of the OEP Pleasure, Productivity, Restoration and Social connection scales.

Methods: Fifty-eight occupational therapy students each completed three OEPs. Many-faceted Rasch analyses were then used to examine rating scale structure, dimensionality, and reliability of each OEP scale. Pearson product moment correlations were used to evaluate the strength of the relationships among the four scales.

Results: Each of the four OEP rating scales demonstrated effective rating scale functioning. The OEP items on each scale demonstrated acceptable levels of item goodness of fit and worked together to define a unidimensional scale of occupational experiences. The four scales appear to measure different but interrelated constructs.

Conclusion: The results provide preliminary evidence to support the validity and reliability of the OEP scales, but further research on larger and more diverse samples is recommended.

Significance: The OEP has the potential to be used in occupational therapy practice and research to evaluate how people experience their occupational performances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development. Fostering social participation among older adults: Perspectives of stakeholders. 'A new sense of my former self' - transforming the self through vocational rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury. Psychometric properties of the arabic version of occupational value with pre-defined ítems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1