丢脸:诊所入口自由法案后，多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织。

IF 0.5 4区医学 Q3 LAW Issues in Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01

Gregory J Roden

{"title":"丢脸:诊所入口自由法案后，多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织。","authors":"Gregory J Roden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 is no longer a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment, in light of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, nor ever was under the Commerce Clause, properly understood, per United States v. Morrison.","PeriodicalId":48665,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Law & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A LOSS OF FACE: The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act post Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory J Roden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 is no longer a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment, in light of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, nor ever was under the Commerce Clause, properly understood, per United States v. Morrison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案，1994年《诊所出入自由法》不再是根据第十四条修正案行使联邦管辖权的有效手段，也不再是根据《美国诉莫里森案》正确理解的《商业条款》行使联邦管辖权的有效手段。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

A LOSS OF FACE: The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act post Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 is no longer a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction under the Fourteenth Amendment, in light of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, nor ever was under the Commerce Clause, properly understood, per United States v. Morrison.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Issues in Law & Medicine Medicine-Health Policy

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Issues in Law & Medicine is a peer reviewed professional journal published semiannually. Founded in 1985, ILM is co-sponsored by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. and the Watson Bowes Research Institute. Issues is devoted to providing technical and informational assistance to attorneys, health care professionals, educators and administrators on legal, medical, and ethical issues arising from health care decisions. Its subscribers include law libraries, medical libraries, university libraries, court libraries, attorneys, physicians, university professors and other scholars, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, but also in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.