镜下血尿和盆腔超声检查可以排除软性膀胱镜检查对t1 -低级别非肌性浸润性膀胱癌的监测。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2023.2202930
Mohamed Awad, Ahmed M Harraz, Hashim Farg, Hady S Gabr, Doaa E Sharaf, Mohamed Abou-El-Ghar, Ahmed S El-Hefnawy, Yasser Osman
{"title":"镜下血尿和盆腔超声检查可以排除软性膀胱镜检查对t1 -低级别非肌性浸润性膀胱癌的监测。","authors":"Mohamed Awad,&nbsp;Ahmed M Harraz,&nbsp;Hashim Farg,&nbsp;Hady S Gabr,&nbsp;Doaa E Sharaf,&nbsp;Mohamed Abou-El-Ghar,&nbsp;Ahmed S El-Hefnawy,&nbsp;Yasser Osman","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2023.2202930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cystoscopy (rigid/flexible [FC]) is the standard surveillance tool for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Nevertheless, it has its drawbacks. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of microscopic hematuria (MH), abdominal ultrasonography (US), and urine cytology (UC) as potential substitutes for FC in patients with T1-low-grade (T1-LG) NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 12-month period, patients attending our tertiary referral center for T1-LG NMIBC follow-up underwent urine analysis for MH and UC, and then US and FC were performed as outpatient surveillance procedures. Those with positive findings underwent inpatient rigid cystoscopy under anesthesia and biopsy. The negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity of different combinations of MH, UC, US, and FC were compared with the standard histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 218 evaluated patients, FC had the highest NPV (97.9%). However, this figure showed no statistically significant difference if compared with the combination of negative MH and US (93.8%) (difference = 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.1) or the combination of MH, US, and UC (94.9%) (difference = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.2). The reported sensitivity results were similarly comparable between FC (94.2%) and the aforementioned combinations (90.4% and 92.3%; differences: 0.038 and 0.019; <i>p</i> = 0.4 and 0.7, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the surveillance of NMIBC for patients diagnosed with T1-LG disease, the combination of MH/US has comparable sensitivity and NPV with FC. This non-invasive combination could be considered the first station that might preclude the need for FC in a considerable percentage of this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microscopic hematuria and pelvic ultrasonography could rule out flexible cystoscopy during surveillance for T1-low grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Awad,&nbsp;Ahmed M Harraz,&nbsp;Hashim Farg,&nbsp;Hady S Gabr,&nbsp;Doaa E Sharaf,&nbsp;Mohamed Abou-El-Ghar,&nbsp;Ahmed S El-Hefnawy,&nbsp;Yasser Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2090598X.2023.2202930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cystoscopy (rigid/flexible [FC]) is the standard surveillance tool for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Nevertheless, it has its drawbacks. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of microscopic hematuria (MH), abdominal ultrasonography (US), and urine cytology (UC) as potential substitutes for FC in patients with T1-low-grade (T1-LG) NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 12-month period, patients attending our tertiary referral center for T1-LG NMIBC follow-up underwent urine analysis for MH and UC, and then US and FC were performed as outpatient surveillance procedures. Those with positive findings underwent inpatient rigid cystoscopy under anesthesia and biopsy. The negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity of different combinations of MH, UC, US, and FC were compared with the standard histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 218 evaluated patients, FC had the highest NPV (97.9%). However, this figure showed no statistically significant difference if compared with the combination of negative MH and US (93.8%) (difference = 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.1) or the combination of MH, US, and UC (94.9%) (difference = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.2). The reported sensitivity results were similarly comparable between FC (94.2%) and the aforementioned combinations (90.4% and 92.3%; differences: 0.038 and 0.019; <i>p</i> = 0.4 and 0.7, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the surveillance of NMIBC for patients diagnosed with T1-LG disease, the combination of MH/US has comparable sensitivity and NPV with FC. This non-invasive combination could be considered the first station that might preclude the need for FC in a considerable percentage of this group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2023.2202930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2023.2202930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膀胱镜检查(刚性/柔性[FC])是非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准监测工具。然而,它也有缺点。本研究的目的是评估显微镜下血尿(MH)、腹部超声检查(US)和尿细胞学检查(UC)在t1 -低级别(T1-LG) NMIBC患者中作为FC的潜在替代品的性能。方法:在12个月的时间里,在我们的三级转诊中心进行T1-LG NMIBC随访的患者进行了MH和UC的尿液分析,然后进行了US和FC作为门诊监测程序。阳性结果的患者在麻醉和活检下接受住院硬性膀胱镜检查。将MH、UC、US、FC不同组合的阴性预测值(NPV)和敏感性与标准组织病理学进行比较。结果:在218例评估患者中,FC的NPV最高(97.9%)。然而,与阴性MH + US合并(93.8%)(差异= 0.04,p = 0.1)或MH + US + UC合并(94.9%)(差异= 0.03,p = 0.2)相比,该数字无统计学意义。报告的敏感性结果在FC(94.2%)和上述组合(90.4%和92.3%;差异:0.038和0.019;P分别= 0.4和0.7)。结论:在诊断为T1-LG疾病的患者的NMIBC监测中,MH/US联合使用具有相当的敏感性和NPV与FC。这种非侵入性联合可以被认为是第一个站,可以在相当比例的这组患者中排除FC的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microscopic hematuria and pelvic ultrasonography could rule out flexible cystoscopy during surveillance for T1-low grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Purpose: Cystoscopy (rigid/flexible [FC]) is the standard surveillance tool for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Nevertheless, it has its drawbacks. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of microscopic hematuria (MH), abdominal ultrasonography (US), and urine cytology (UC) as potential substitutes for FC in patients with T1-low-grade (T1-LG) NMIBC.

Methods: Over a 12-month period, patients attending our tertiary referral center for T1-LG NMIBC follow-up underwent urine analysis for MH and UC, and then US and FC were performed as outpatient surveillance procedures. Those with positive findings underwent inpatient rigid cystoscopy under anesthesia and biopsy. The negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity of different combinations of MH, UC, US, and FC were compared with the standard histopathology.

Results: In 218 evaluated patients, FC had the highest NPV (97.9%). However, this figure showed no statistically significant difference if compared with the combination of negative MH and US (93.8%) (difference = 0.04, p = 0.1) or the combination of MH, US, and UC (94.9%) (difference = 0.03, p = 0.2). The reported sensitivity results were similarly comparable between FC (94.2%) and the aforementioned combinations (90.4% and 92.3%; differences: 0.038 and 0.019; p = 0.4 and 0.7, respectively).

Conclusions: During the surveillance of NMIBC for patients diagnosed with T1-LG disease, the combination of MH/US has comparable sensitivity and NPV with FC. This non-invasive combination could be considered the first station that might preclude the need for FC in a considerable percentage of this group of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic male infertility – what are we missing? Do mobile phones and laptop computers really impact sperm? Efficacy and safety of office-based diode laser ablation for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer under local anaesthesia: A pilot study Posterior tibial nerve stimulation versus desmopressin in treating children with primary mono-symptomatic nocturnal enuresis. A randomized clinical trial “Laser vaporization of the prostate: A comparative study between ejaculatory preserving and non-ejaculatory preserving technique”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1