慢性呼吸道疾病患者的护理和临终沟通需求目标。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000672
Lynn F Reinke, Tracy Fasolino, Donald R Sullivan
{"title":"慢性呼吸道疾病患者的护理和临终沟通需求目标。","authors":"Lynn F Reinke, Tracy Fasolino, Donald R Sullivan","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>To highlight recent advances in effective communication among persons with chronic respiratory diseases. The authors focus on communication science related to goals of care (GOC) discussions, medical devices, and life-sustaining invasive treatments. The authors discuss important considerations when working with individuals with low literacy and rurality. Communication handoffs between respiratory clinicians and/or palliative care to hospice clinicians are summarized to ensure effective person-centered and caregiver-centered care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies suggest the following communication approaches: (1) clarify differences between palliative and end of life; (2) conduct conversations early and gradual throughout the illness trajectory; (3) distinguish types of GOC discussions as they relate to treatment preferences; (4) for patients from rural communities, include family members and spiritual leaders; (5) assess literacy and employ supportive strategies; (6) apply time-limited-trial framework for life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions; and (7) standardize processes for communication handoffs to hospice clinicians to improve communication fidelity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective communication tools for clinicians to engage in GOC discussions for persons with chronic respiratory diseases are grounded in a patient-centered framework. A trained clinician should lead these conversations and include interdisciplinary team members throughout the disease trajectory including at the end of life. These approaches may enable patients to express their values and care preferences as they evolve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"283-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goals of care and end-of-life communication needs of persons with chronic respiratory disease.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn F Reinke, Tracy Fasolino, Donald R Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>To highlight recent advances in effective communication among persons with chronic respiratory diseases. The authors focus on communication science related to goals of care (GOC) discussions, medical devices, and life-sustaining invasive treatments. The authors discuss important considerations when working with individuals with low literacy and rurality. Communication handoffs between respiratory clinicians and/or palliative care to hospice clinicians are summarized to ensure effective person-centered and caregiver-centered care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies suggest the following communication approaches: (1) clarify differences between palliative and end of life; (2) conduct conversations early and gradual throughout the illness trajectory; (3) distinguish types of GOC discussions as they relate to treatment preferences; (4) for patients from rural communities, include family members and spiritual leaders; (5) assess literacy and employ supportive strategies; (6) apply time-limited-trial framework for life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions; and (7) standardize processes for communication handoffs to hospice clinicians to improve communication fidelity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective communication tools for clinicians to engage in GOC discussions for persons with chronic respiratory diseases are grounded in a patient-centered framework. A trained clinician should lead these conversations and include interdisciplinary team members throughout the disease trajectory including at the end of life. These approaches may enable patients to express their values and care preferences as they evolve over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:强调慢性呼吸系统疾病患者之间有效沟通的最新进展。作者专注于与护理目标(GOC)讨论、医疗设备和维持生命的侵入性治疗相关的传播科学。作者讨论了与低识字率和农村人口合作时的重要考虑因素。总结了呼吸科临床医生和/或姑息治疗与临终关怀临床医生之间的沟通交接,以确保有效的以人为中心和以护理者为中心的护理。最近的研究结果:研究提出了以下沟通方法:(1)阐明姑息治疗和生命终结之间的差异;(2) 在整个疾病发展过程中尽早、循序渐进地进行对话;(3) 区分GOC讨论的类型,因为它们与治疗偏好有关;(4) 对于来自农村社区的患者,包括家庭成员和精神领袖;(5) 评估识字率并采用支持性战略;(6) 对维持生命治疗(LST)决策应用限时试验框架;以及(7)将通信切换到临终关怀临床医生的过程标准化,以提高通信保真度。摘要:临床医生参与慢性呼吸系统疾病患者GOC讨论的有效沟通工具基于以患者为中心的框架。经过培训的临床医生应该领导这些对话,并在疾病发展过程中包括在生命结束时包括跨学科团队成员。随着时间的推移,这些方法可能使患者能够表达他们的价值观和护理偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Goals of care and end-of-life communication needs of persons with chronic respiratory disease.

Purpose of the review: To highlight recent advances in effective communication among persons with chronic respiratory diseases. The authors focus on communication science related to goals of care (GOC) discussions, medical devices, and life-sustaining invasive treatments. The authors discuss important considerations when working with individuals with low literacy and rurality. Communication handoffs between respiratory clinicians and/or palliative care to hospice clinicians are summarized to ensure effective person-centered and caregiver-centered care.

Recent findings: Studies suggest the following communication approaches: (1) clarify differences between palliative and end of life; (2) conduct conversations early and gradual throughout the illness trajectory; (3) distinguish types of GOC discussions as they relate to treatment preferences; (4) for patients from rural communities, include family members and spiritual leaders; (5) assess literacy and employ supportive strategies; (6) apply time-limited-trial framework for life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions; and (7) standardize processes for communication handoffs to hospice clinicians to improve communication fidelity.

Summary: Effective communication tools for clinicians to engage in GOC discussions for persons with chronic respiratory diseases are grounded in a patient-centered framework. A trained clinician should lead these conversations and include interdisciplinary team members throughout the disease trajectory including at the end of life. These approaches may enable patients to express their values and care preferences as they evolve over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
期刊最新文献
Palliative radiation therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. The use of precision radiotherapy for the management of cancer related pain in the abdomen. Advances in breathlessness support services for people with serious illness. Bridging the care gap: radiation therapy in elderly and frail cancer patients. The gut microbiome and the brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1