所有的痴迷都在同样程度上与个人价值观相矛盾吗?一项试点调查。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.291
Gillian M Alcolado, Karen Rowa, Irena Milosevic, Randi E McCabe
{"title":"所有的痴迷都在同样程度上与个人价值观相矛盾吗?一项试点调查。","authors":"Gillian M Alcolado,&nbsp;Karen Rowa,&nbsp;Irena Milosevic,&nbsp;Randi E McCabe","doi":"10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although much is known about how intrusive thoughts become obsessions, the factors that determine which particular thoughts do so is not. The degree to which intrusions are personally significant may be such a determinant. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is heterogeneous; thus, it is possible that contradictions of personal values may play a varying role in the development of obsessions depending on which OCD symptoms manifest and may change differentially following treatment. Archival data were examined. Patients with a diagnosis of OCD (N = 62) reported their most upsetting obsession and the degree to which it violated values both pre- and postparticipation in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for OCD. At pretreatment, contradiction ratings differed across symptom domains, such that participants with primary symptoms of obsessions/checking exhibited contradiction ratings that were significantly greater than did participants with other primary symptoms. Contradiction ratings did not change posttreatment. Implications for the conceptualization of OCD are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51683,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do all obsessions contradict personal values to the same degree? A pilot investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian M Alcolado,&nbsp;Karen Rowa,&nbsp;Irena Milosevic,&nbsp;Randi E McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although much is known about how intrusive thoughts become obsessions, the factors that determine which particular thoughts do so is not. The degree to which intrusions are personally significant may be such a determinant. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is heterogeneous; thus, it is possible that contradictions of personal values may play a varying role in the development of obsessions depending on which OCD symptoms manifest and may change differentially following treatment. Archival data were examined. Patients with a diagnosis of OCD (N = 62) reported their most upsetting obsession and the degree to which it violated values both pre- and postparticipation in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for OCD. At pretreatment, contradiction ratings differed across symptom domains, such that participants with primary symptoms of obsessions/checking exhibited contradiction ratings that were significantly greater than did participants with other primary symptoms. Contradiction ratings did not change posttreatment. Implications for the conceptualization of OCD are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.2023.87.3.291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管我们对侵入性思想如何成为强迫症了解甚多,但决定哪些特定思想会成为强迫症的因素还不清楚。入侵对个人的影响程度可能就是这样一个决定因素。强迫症(OCD)是异质性的;因此,个人价值观的矛盾可能在强迫症的发展中发挥不同的作用,这取决于强迫症症状的表现,并可能在治疗后发生不同的变化。对档案资料进行了检查。被诊断为强迫症的患者(N = 62)报告了他们最令人不安的困扰,以及它违反强迫症群体认知行为治疗前后价值观的程度。在预处理时,矛盾评分在不同症状域之间存在差异,例如,具有强迫/检查主要症状的参与者表现出的矛盾评分显著高于具有其他主要症状的参与者。矛盾评分在处理后没有改变。讨论了强迫症概念化的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do all obsessions contradict personal values to the same degree? A pilot investigation.

Although much is known about how intrusive thoughts become obsessions, the factors that determine which particular thoughts do so is not. The degree to which intrusions are personally significant may be such a determinant. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is heterogeneous; thus, it is possible that contradictions of personal values may play a varying role in the development of obsessions depending on which OCD symptoms manifest and may change differentially following treatment. Archival data were examined. Patients with a diagnosis of OCD (N = 62) reported their most upsetting obsession and the degree to which it violated values both pre- and postparticipation in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for OCD. At pretreatment, contradiction ratings differed across symptom domains, such that participants with primary symptoms of obsessions/checking exhibited contradiction ratings that were significantly greater than did participants with other primary symptoms. Contradiction ratings did not change posttreatment. Implications for the conceptualization of OCD are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic offers a psychodynamic perspective on the application of theory and research in outpatient psychotherapy, attachment theory, developments in cognitive neuroscience and psychopathologies, as well as the integration of different modes of therapy. This widely indexed, peer-reviewed journal has been published since 1936 by the Menninger Clinic. Topical issues focus on critical subjects such as disordered attachments, panic disorder, trauma, and evidence-based interventions.
期刊最新文献
Associations of night eating with depressive symptoms among health sciences students living in a postconflict region. Attachment and mentalization among survivors of sexual abuse: A questionnaire survey. Evolutionary systems therapy for paranoid personality disorder: A seven cases series. Perceived worsening of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms after childbirth in women and men: An understudied phenomenon. Predicting response to and relapse after treatment of trichotillomania with the Comprehensive Behavioral model (ComB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1