Lorena P Gallardo-Peralta, Vicente Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Lorena Valencia Galvez, Julio Tereucan Angulo, Abel Soto Higuera, Esteban Sánchez-Moreno
{"title":"对加拿大、美国、墨西哥、智利和新西兰土著居民老龄化情况进行系统审查。","authors":"Lorena P Gallardo-Peralta, Vicente Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Lorena Valencia Galvez, Julio Tereucan Angulo, Abel Soto Higuera, Esteban Sánchez-Moreno","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2023.2252883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ageing in place (AIP) model enjoys widespread recognition in gerontology and has been strongly encouraged through social policy. However, progress remains to be made in terms of analysing AIP for minority groups and groups with diverse life pathways in old age. This systematic review aims to identify studies that address the AIP model in indigenous communities, answering the following questions: In which geographical contexts and for which Indigenous Peoples have AIP been researched? Which physical dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? Which social dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? This systematic review applied the SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis) method to AIP among Indigenous older adults on the Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Scopus digital platforms for publications from 2011 to 2021. We identified 12 studies conducted in five countries in North and South America and Oceania. The results show that the following elements of the physical environment are assessed: household, neighbourhood, local surroundings or reserve and native territories. Meanwhile, assessed elements of the social environment are as follows: personal characteristics, attachment to place, social networks, social participation and social policies. There is discussion of the need to develop AIP in order to promote successful ageing among Indigenous older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7c/c1/RHPB_11_2252883.PMC10484031.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of ageing in place among Indigenous People in Canada, USA, México, Chile and New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Lorena P Gallardo-Peralta, Vicente Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Lorena Valencia Galvez, Julio Tereucan Angulo, Abel Soto Higuera, Esteban Sánchez-Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21642850.2023.2252883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ageing in place (AIP) model enjoys widespread recognition in gerontology and has been strongly encouraged through social policy. However, progress remains to be made in terms of analysing AIP for minority groups and groups with diverse life pathways in old age. This systematic review aims to identify studies that address the AIP model in indigenous communities, answering the following questions: In which geographical contexts and for which Indigenous Peoples have AIP been researched? Which physical dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? Which social dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? This systematic review applied the SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis) method to AIP among Indigenous older adults on the Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Scopus digital platforms for publications from 2011 to 2021. We identified 12 studies conducted in five countries in North and South America and Oceania. The results show that the following elements of the physical environment are assessed: household, neighbourhood, local surroundings or reserve and native territories. Meanwhile, assessed elements of the social environment are as follows: personal characteristics, attachment to place, social networks, social participation and social policies. There is discussion of the need to develop AIP in order to promote successful ageing among Indigenous older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7c/c1/RHPB_11_2252883.PMC10484031.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2252883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2023.2252883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
就地老龄化(AIP)模式在老年学中得到广泛认可,并得到社会政策的大力鼓励。然而,在分析少数群体和老年生活途径多样化群体的AIP方面仍有待取得进展。本系统综述旨在确定在土著社区中解决AIP模式的研究,回答以下问题:在何种地理背景下以及针对哪些土著人民进行了AIP研究?在评估AIP时要考虑哪些物理维度?在评估AIP时考虑了哪些社会维度?本系统综述应用SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis)方法对2011年至2021年在Web of Science、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和Scopus数字平台上发表的土著老年人AIP进行分析。我们确定了在南北美洲和大洋洲的五个国家进行的12项研究。结果表明,对自然环境的以下要素进行了评估:家庭、邻里、当地环境或保护区和土著领土。同时,社会环境的评估要素包括:个人特征、对地方的依恋、社会网络、社会参与和社会政策。还讨论了发展AIP以促进土著老年人成功老龄化的必要性。
A systematic review of ageing in place among Indigenous People in Canada, USA, México, Chile and New Zealand.
The ageing in place (AIP) model enjoys widespread recognition in gerontology and has been strongly encouraged through social policy. However, progress remains to be made in terms of analysing AIP for minority groups and groups with diverse life pathways in old age. This systematic review aims to identify studies that address the AIP model in indigenous communities, answering the following questions: In which geographical contexts and for which Indigenous Peoples have AIP been researched? Which physical dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? Which social dimensions are considered in the assessment of AIP? This systematic review applied the SALSA (Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis) method to AIP among Indigenous older adults on the Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Scopus digital platforms for publications from 2011 to 2021. We identified 12 studies conducted in five countries in North and South America and Oceania. The results show that the following elements of the physical environment are assessed: household, neighbourhood, local surroundings or reserve and native territories. Meanwhile, assessed elements of the social environment are as follows: personal characteristics, attachment to place, social networks, social participation and social policies. There is discussion of the need to develop AIP in order to promote successful ageing among Indigenous older adults.
期刊介绍:
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.