非熏蒸杀线虫剂对烟根结线虫繁殖和致病性及烟草病害严重程度的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Journal of nematology Pub Date : 2023-06-05 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.2478/jofnem-2023-0025
Md Shah Alam, Churamani Khanal, Joseph Roberts, William Rutter
{"title":"非熏蒸杀线虫剂对烟根结线虫繁殖和致病性及烟草病害严重程度的影响。","authors":"Md Shah Alam, Churamani Khanal, Joseph Roberts, William Rutter","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> is a highly aggressive quarantine pathogen which threatens the multibillion-dollar tobacco industry and is not manageable with the currently available management methods in tobacco. There is currently no known host plant resistance in tobacco and previous studies have shown that the lower level of the currently recommended rate of non-fumigant nematicides does not provide satisfactory management of <i>M. enterolobii</i>. The current study was conducted with the hypothesis that <i>M. enterolobii</i> can be better managed using a single soil application of the maximum allowed rate of non-fumigant nematicides. Treatments involved three non-fumigant chemical nematicides (oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone), a biological nematicide derived from Burkholderia, and a non-treated control. Fluensulfone significantly suppressed the nematode reproduction relative to the control, the suppression being 71% for eggs and 86% for the second stage juveniles (J2). Fluopyram also suppressed nematode reproduction, although this was statistically insignificant, with the suppression being 26% and 37% for eggs and J2, respectively. Oxamyl significantly suppressed J2 (80%), but not eggs (50%) in relation to the control. The most significant reduction of disease severity was achieved by the application of fluensulfone (64%), followed by oxamyl (54%) and fluopyram (48%). Except for fluensulfone, which significantly reduced the root biomass, none of the nematicides significantly impacted root and shoot biomass. The biological nematicide did not significantly affect nematode reproduction, pathogenicity, or disease severity. The results from the current study suggest that while the non-fumigant nematicides provided a good level of the nematode suppression, more research is needed to improve the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides through employing better application methods or finding better chemistries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":"55 1","pages":"20230025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of non-fumigant nematicides on reproduction and pathogenicity of <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> and disease severity in tobacco.\",\"authors\":\"Md Shah Alam, Churamani Khanal, Joseph Roberts, William Rutter\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jofnem-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> is a highly aggressive quarantine pathogen which threatens the multibillion-dollar tobacco industry and is not manageable with the currently available management methods in tobacco. There is currently no known host plant resistance in tobacco and previous studies have shown that the lower level of the currently recommended rate of non-fumigant nematicides does not provide satisfactory management of <i>M. enterolobii</i>. The current study was conducted with the hypothesis that <i>M. enterolobii</i> can be better managed using a single soil application of the maximum allowed rate of non-fumigant nematicides. Treatments involved three non-fumigant chemical nematicides (oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone), a biological nematicide derived from Burkholderia, and a non-treated control. Fluensulfone significantly suppressed the nematode reproduction relative to the control, the suppression being 71% for eggs and 86% for the second stage juveniles (J2). Fluopyram also suppressed nematode reproduction, although this was statistically insignificant, with the suppression being 26% and 37% for eggs and J2, respectively. Oxamyl significantly suppressed J2 (80%), but not eggs (50%) in relation to the control. The most significant reduction of disease severity was achieved by the application of fluensulfone (64%), followed by oxamyl (54%) and fluopyram (48%). Except for fluensulfone, which significantly reduced the root biomass, none of the nematicides significantly impacted root and shoot biomass. The biological nematicide did not significantly affect nematode reproduction, pathogenicity, or disease severity. The results from the current study suggest that while the non-fumigant nematicides provided a good level of the nematode suppression, more research is needed to improve the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides through employing better application methods or finding better chemistries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"20230025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肠球根结线虫是一种极具攻击性的检疫病原体,威胁着价值数十亿美元的烟草业,用目前可用的烟草管理方法是无法控制的。目前烟草中还没有已知的寄主植物抗性,先前的研究表明,目前推荐的非熏蒸杀线虫剂的使用率较低,并不能提供令人满意的肠杆菌管理。目前的研究是基于这样一种假设进行的,即使用非熏蒸杀线虫剂的最大允许速率的单一土壤施用可以更好地管理M.enterolobii。处理涉及三种非熏蒸化学杀线虫剂(恶氨酰、氟吡喃和氟磺酮)、一种源自伯克霍尔德菌的生物杀线虫剂和一种未处理的对照。与对照相比,氟磺酮显著抑制了线虫的繁殖,对卵的抑制率为71%,对第二阶段幼体的抑制率(J2)为86%。Fluopyram也抑制线虫繁殖,尽管这在统计学上不显著,对卵和J2的抑制率分别为26%和37%。与对照相比,戊基显著抑制J2(80%),但不抑制卵(50%)。最显著的疾病严重程度降低是通过使用氟磺酮(64%),其次是恶氨酰(54%)和氟吡喃(48%)。除氟磺酮显著降低根系生物量外,其他杀线虫剂均未对根系和地上部生物量产生显著影响。生物杀线虫剂对线虫的繁殖、致病性或疾病严重程度没有显著影响。目前的研究结果表明,虽然非熏蒸杀线虫剂提供了良好的线虫抑制水平,但还需要更多的研究来通过采用更好的应用方法或寻找更好的化学物质来提高非熏蒸杀虫剂的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of non-fumigant nematicides on reproduction and pathogenicity of Meloidogyne enterolobii and disease severity in tobacco.

Meloidogyne enterolobii is a highly aggressive quarantine pathogen which threatens the multibillion-dollar tobacco industry and is not manageable with the currently available management methods in tobacco. There is currently no known host plant resistance in tobacco and previous studies have shown that the lower level of the currently recommended rate of non-fumigant nematicides does not provide satisfactory management of M. enterolobii. The current study was conducted with the hypothesis that M. enterolobii can be better managed using a single soil application of the maximum allowed rate of non-fumigant nematicides. Treatments involved three non-fumigant chemical nematicides (oxamyl, fluopyram, and fluensulfone), a biological nematicide derived from Burkholderia, and a non-treated control. Fluensulfone significantly suppressed the nematode reproduction relative to the control, the suppression being 71% for eggs and 86% for the second stage juveniles (J2). Fluopyram also suppressed nematode reproduction, although this was statistically insignificant, with the suppression being 26% and 37% for eggs and J2, respectively. Oxamyl significantly suppressed J2 (80%), but not eggs (50%) in relation to the control. The most significant reduction of disease severity was achieved by the application of fluensulfone (64%), followed by oxamyl (54%) and fluopyram (48%). Except for fluensulfone, which significantly reduced the root biomass, none of the nematicides significantly impacted root and shoot biomass. The biological nematicide did not significantly affect nematode reproduction, pathogenicity, or disease severity. The results from the current study suggest that while the non-fumigant nematicides provided a good level of the nematode suppression, more research is needed to improve the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides through employing better application methods or finding better chemistries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nematology
Journal of nematology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Meloidogyne marylandi is Involved in, but not the Primary Cause of Creeping Bentgrass Decline of Putting Greens in Southern California. Population Dynamics of Mesocriconema xenoplax Parasitizing Sweet Cherry Trees in British Columbia, Canada. The Rate of Decline of Sugarbeet Cyst Nematode in Central California Under Nonhost Crops May Impact Biofuel Production. Description of Panagrolaimus namibiensis n. sp. (Rhabditida: Panagrolaimidae), an Anhydrobiotic Nematode from the Namib Desert of Namibia. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Meloidogyne arenaria () Populations Parasitizing Pistachio in Kerman and Khorasan Razavi Provinces, Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1