澳大利亚各地社区应对自然灾害的复原力:社区复原力联合评估测量法的应用

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1111/disa.12590
Kerstin K. Zander, Rifka Sibarani, Matthew Abunyewah, Michael Odei Erdiaw-Kwasie, Simon A. Moss, Jonatan Lassa, Stephen T. Garnett
{"title":"澳大利亚各地社区应对自然灾害的复原力:社区复原力联合评估测量法的应用","authors":"Kerstin K. Zander,&nbsp;Rifka Sibarani,&nbsp;Matthew Abunyewah,&nbsp;Michael Odei Erdiaw-Kwasie,&nbsp;Simon A. Moss,&nbsp;Jonatan Lassa,&nbsp;Stephen T. Garnett","doi":"10.1111/disa.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natural hazards can turn into disasters when not managed well. An important part of disaster risk reduction is to understand how well communities are prepared for natural hazards and how well they can cope with and recover from shocks in the long term. This research assesses self-reported community resilience and asks what makes a community resilient, using Australia as a case study. It reports on an Australian-wide online survey which included questions related to the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement, a subjective indicator, as well as questions about risk perception, well-being, and self-efficacy. Community resilience was found to be moderately high but scores for community leadership and preparedness were low. Perceived community resilience was positively correlated with age and those with high scores for self-efficacy and well-being. There was, as expected, an inverse relationship between reliance on external support during natural hazards and self-efficacy. The results complement previous studies which used different measures of community resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.12590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community resilience across Australia towards natural hazards: an application of the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement\",\"authors\":\"Kerstin K. Zander,&nbsp;Rifka Sibarani,&nbsp;Matthew Abunyewah,&nbsp;Michael Odei Erdiaw-Kwasie,&nbsp;Simon A. Moss,&nbsp;Jonatan Lassa,&nbsp;Stephen T. Garnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/disa.12590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Natural hazards can turn into disasters when not managed well. An important part of disaster risk reduction is to understand how well communities are prepared for natural hazards and how well they can cope with and recover from shocks in the long term. This research assesses self-reported community resilience and asks what makes a community resilient, using Australia as a case study. It reports on an Australian-wide online survey which included questions related to the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement, a subjective indicator, as well as questions about risk perception, well-being, and self-efficacy. Community resilience was found to be moderately high but scores for community leadership and preparedness were low. Perceived community resilience was positively correlated with age and those with high scores for self-efficacy and well-being. There was, as expected, an inverse relationship between reliance on external support during natural hazards and self-efficacy. The results complement previous studies which used different measures of community resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disasters\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.12590\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果管理不善,自然灾害就会变成灾难。减少灾害风险的一个重要部分就是要了解社区对自然灾害的准备程度,以及他们应对冲击和从冲击中长期恢复的能力。本研究以澳大利亚为案例,评估了自我报告的社区抗灾能力,并询问了是什么造就了社区的抗灾能力。它报告了一项全澳大利亚范围内的在线调查,其中包括与主观指标 "社区复原力联合评估测量 "相关的问题,以及有关风险认知、幸福感和自我效能的问题。调查发现,社区复原力中等偏上,但社区领导力和准备度得分较低。感知到的社区复原力与年龄以及自我效能和幸福感得分高的人呈正相关。正如预期的那样,自然灾害期间对外部支持的依赖与自我效能感之间存在反向关系。这些结果是对以往使用不同方法衡量社区抗灾能力的研究的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community resilience across Australia towards natural hazards: an application of the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement

Natural hazards can turn into disasters when not managed well. An important part of disaster risk reduction is to understand how well communities are prepared for natural hazards and how well they can cope with and recover from shocks in the long term. This research assesses self-reported community resilience and asks what makes a community resilient, using Australia as a case study. It reports on an Australian-wide online survey which included questions related to the Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measurement, a subjective indicator, as well as questions about risk perception, well-being, and self-efficacy. Community resilience was found to be moderately high but scores for community leadership and preparedness were low. Perceived community resilience was positively correlated with age and those with high scores for self-efficacy and well-being. There was, as expected, an inverse relationship between reliance on external support during natural hazards and self-efficacy. The results complement previous studies which used different measures of community resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
The gendered politics of the ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: Acholi traditional justice and gender in post-conflict Uganda Exploring the relationship between hurricanes and online sex trafficking advertisements: using Hurricane Laura as a case study Disaster, appropriation, and displacement in the Indian Sundarbans Boolean trust in levels of government: the case of household emergency preparedness Armenia and Türkiye between conflict and cooperation: explaining (with) disaster diplomacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1